Rudanovskaya 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.52	3	0.15	2	0.20	2	0.68	29	0.23	1	0.40
Ax 1995		9	0.48	9	0.02	7	0.15	3	0.63	48	0.08	5	0.22
Bacha 1998		53	0.34	52	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.06	51	0.06	37	0.06
Barbosa 1983		45	0.37	47	0.00	52	0.04	62	0.04	61	0.04	60	0.04
BenOr 1989		18	0.45	23	0.01	27	0.09	27	0.28	54	0.07	22	0.14
Biret 1990		26	0.42	40	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.23	59	0.04	32	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		21	0.44	48	0.00	25	0.10	17	0.41	49	0.07	13	0.17
Chiu 1999		30	0.41	29	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.07	39	0.06	36	0.06
Clidat 1994		8	0.48	6	0.05	10	0.17	9	0.55	59	0.04	19	0.15
Cohen 1997		62	0.27	33	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	29	0.14	34	0.07
Cortot 1951		64	0.19	61	0.00	64	0.05	50	0.05	61	0.03	64	0.04
Csalog 1996		12	0.47	10	0.02	13	0.15	15	0.44	32	0.15	3	0.26
Czerny 1989		28	0.41	50	0.00	28	0.09	25	0.33	60	0.05	24	0.13
Ezaki 2006		44	0.37	27	0.00	44	0.06	46	0.06	63	0.04	42	0.05
Falvay 1989		4	0.50	12	0.02	11	0.14	11	0.51	58	0.06	14	0.17
Fiorentino 1962		36	0.39	26	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.06	62	0.04	54	0.05
Fliere 1977		11	0.47	4	0.08	5	0.15	10	0.53	40	0.08	8	0.21
Fou 1978		10	0.48	11	0.02	6	0.18	7	0.58	44	0.07	9	0.20
Francois 1956		38	0.39	31	0.00	32	0.09	31	0.20	55	0.06	29	0.11
Goldenweiser 1946		32	0.40	21	0.01	48	0.05	49	0.05	58	0.05	44	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.37	65	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04
Groot 1988		6	0.49	8	0.03	8	0.26	4	0.62	42	0.08	6	0.22
Hatto 1993		23	0.43	25	0.00	17	0.09	16	0.42	60	0.05	23	0.14
Hatto 1997		15	0.45	35	0.00	16	0.16	14	0.46	50	0.07	11	0.18
Horszowski 1983		61	0.27	57	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.04	56	0.04
Indjic 2001		16	0.45	13	0.01	14	0.17	13	0.48	59	0.05	20	0.15
Katin 1996		47	0.36	34	0.00	41	0.06	45	0.06	59	0.04	49	0.05
Kiepura 1999		33	0.39	37	0.00	50	0.06	44	0.06	59	0.05	43	0.05
Korecka 1992		40	0.38	55	0.00	43	0.05	47	0.05	44	0.08	38	0.06
Kushner 1990		7	0.49	7	0.03	9	0.19	8	0.57	61	0.04	18	0.15
Lilamand 2001		55	0.34	32	0.00	51	0.04	64	0.04	42	0.06	50	0.05
Luisada 1990		58	0.31	63	0.00	59	0.06	38	0.06	60	0.05	52	0.05
Luisada 2008		49	0.35	36	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04
Lushtak 2004		31	0.40	53	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.15	59	0.05	33	0.09
Malcuzynski 1951		37	0.39	56	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.06	62	0.05	55	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.35	44	0.00	47	0.05	55	0.05	61	0.05	48	0.05
Magaloff 1977		59	0.30	51	0.00	54	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.04
Magin 1975		56	0.33	59	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	56	0.06	47	0.05
Meguri 1997		43	0.38	28	0.00	34	0.07	36	0.07	47	0.05	39	0.06
Milkina 1970		42	0.38	62	0.00	22	0.07	20	0.39	55	0.06	16	0.15
Mohovich 1999		25	0.42	15	0.01	30	0.09	28	0.24	51	0.06	27	0.12
Nezu 2005		39	0.38	60	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.07	62	0.04	53	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.41	43	0.00	21	0.08	26	0.32	60	0.04	28	0.11
Olejniczak 1990		5	0.49	2	0.16	4	0.21	6	0.60	42	0.08	7	0.22
Osinska 1989		19	0.44	16	0.01	19	0.08	21	0.38	48	0.08	12	0.17
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.32	49	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.04	57	0.04
Poblocka 1999		52	0.35	45	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	60	0.05	45	0.05
Rangell 2001		60	0.29	46	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	64	0.03	66	0.03
Richter 1960		35	0.39	64	0.00	49	0.06	42	0.06	64	0.04	51	0.05
Richter 1961		41	0.38	17	0.01	45	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.07	35	0.06
Rosen 1989		24	0.43	41	0.00	24	0.08	24	0.33	59	0.05	25	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.34	20	0.01	38	0.06	39	0.06	63	0.03	58	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.41	39	0.00	23	0.07	23	0.36	57	0.05	26	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.36	30	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.08	57	0.05	40	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		17	0.45	14	0.01	15	0.14	18	0.41	32	0.27	2	0.33
Smith 1975		51	0.35	58	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.06	46	0.05
Sztompka 1959		63	0.24	66	0.00	63	0.05	48	0.05	62	0.04	59	0.04
Tanyel 1992		14	0.46	22	0.01	12	0.12	12	0.49	53	0.06	15	0.17
Tsujii 2005		2	0.52	5	0.07	3	0.28	5	0.60	49	0.07	10	0.20
Uninsky 1959		22	0.43	38	0.00	26	0.08	22	0.36	48	0.06	17	0.15
Vardi 1988		13	0.46	18	0.01	18	0.08	19	0.39	52	0.05	21	0.14
Wasowski 1980		34	0.39	19	0.01	20	0.06	32	0.15	49	0.07	30	0.10
Zimerman 1975		20	0.44	24	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.21	59	0.05	31	0.10
Average		1	0.56	1	0.22	1	0.21	1	0.77	53	0.07	4	0.23
Random 1		67	-0.06	42	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	48	0.04	67	0.02
Random 2		65	-0.04	67	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	30	0.18	41	0.06
Random 3		66	-0.06	54	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	51	0.04	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).