Rangell 2001

Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981	13	0.53	15	0.01	17	0.11	16	0.52	52	0.05	27	0.16
Ax 1995	38	0.43	31	0.00	42	0.05	45	0.05	58	0.05	52	0.05
Bacha 1998	56	0.35	57	0.00	57	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.06	47	0.05
Barbosa 1983	27	0.48	9	0.01	11	0.11	25	0.45	41	0.07	21	0.18
BenOr 1989	31	0.45	44	0.00	49	0.04	55	0.04	63	0.04	63	0.04
Biret 1990	55	0.38	37	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.04	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960	53	0.39	59	0.00	56	0.05	46	0.05	60	0.05	43	0.05
Chiu 1999	49	0.40	23	0.00	41	0.04	57	0.04	42	0.06	45	0.05
Clidat 1994	43	0.41	51	0.00	29	0.11	30	0.33	44	0.05	33	0.13
Cohen 1997	45	0.41	35	0.00	53	0.06	43	0.06	15	0.44	28	0.16
Cortot 1951	50	0.40	40	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	35	0.08	41	0.06
Csalog 1996	44	0.41	16	0.01	37	0.08	36	0.08	55	0.05	40	0.06
Czerny 1989	17	0.52	10	0.01	25	0.11	26	0.44	52	0.05	29	0.15
Ezaki 2006	11	0.54	30	0.00	14	0.12	9	0.63	57	0.05	19	0.18
Falvay 1989	5	0.58	11	0.01	9	0.15	7	0.68	55	0.06	15	0.20
Fiorentino 1962	41	0.42	34	0.00	38	0.06	39	0.06	56	0.05	51	0.05
Fliere 1977	20	0.51	29	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.50	38	0.08	13	0.20
Fou 1978	15	0.53	20	0.00	26	0.14	20	0.48	51	0.06	22	0.17
Francois 1956	52	0.39	55	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.06	57	0.05	53	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946	61	0.30	33	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994	48	0.40	52	0.00	46	0.04	56	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.04
Groot 1988	58	0.33	56	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.04	65	0.04
Hatto 1993	8	0.56	13	0.01	6	0.24	6	0.71	35	0.09	7	0.25
Hatto 1997	3	0.59	4	0.12	3	0.29	3	0.76	42	0.07	10	0.23
Horszowski 1983	60	0.30	62	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.04
Indjic 2001	6	0.57	26	0.00	5	0.19	4	0.73	34	0.11	6	0.28
Katin 1996	18	0.52	7	0.03	12	0.10	11	0.59	52	0.06	18	0.19
Kiepura 1999	35	0.44	45	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.06	60	0.05	42	0.05
Korecka 1992	57	0.34	60	0.00	58	0.07	37	0.07	59	0.05	39	0.06
Kushner 1990	25	0.49	17	0.00	28	0.11	23	0.45	48	0.06	25	0.16
Lilamand 2001	64	0.27	58	0.00	64	0.05	49	0.05	53	0.04	58	0.04
Luisada 1990	42	0.41	49	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.06	50	0.05
Luisada 2008	40	0.42	38	0.00	44	0.05	47	0.05	57	0.05	49	0.05
Lushtak 2004	2	0.60	1	0.23	1	0.22	2	0.80	30	0.18	4	0.38
Malcuzynski 1951	22	0.50	46	0.00	27	0.12	27	0.40	55	0.06	31	0.15
Malcuzynski 1961	14	0.53	47	0.00	23	0.10	15	0.53	59	0.06	20	0.18
Magaloff 1977	63	0.28	65	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	59	0.05	59	0.04
Magin 1975	39	0.43	41	0.00	52	0.06	42	0.06	60	0.05	46	0.05
Meguri 1997	26	0.49	18	0.00	15	0.12	21	0.48	28	0.30	3	0.38
Milkina 1970	23	0.50	24	0.00	16	0.11	12	0.58	45	0.09	9	0.23
Mohovich 1999	28	0.48	63	0.00	31	0.14	28	0.36	52	0.05	34	0.13
Nezu 2005	10	0.55	8	0.02	8	0.27	10	0.60	49	0.07	16	0.20
Ohlsson 1999	12	0.53	64	0.00	22	0.09	19	0.49	44	0.09	12	0.21
Olejniczak 1990	34	0.45	39	0.00	35	0.09	35	0.09	63	0.05	37	0.07
Osinska 1989	19	0.51	25	0.00	24	0.11	17	0.51	47	0.08	14	0.20
Perlemuter 1992	51	0.39	22	0.00	34	0.10	34	0.10	10	0.36	17	0.19
Poblocka 1999	36	0.44	42	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	55	0.05	44	0.05
Rangell 2001	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1960	30	0.47	14	0.01	18	0.10	31	0.32	25	0.26	5	0.29
Richter 1961	32	0.45	6	0.08	10	0.11	22	0.47	10	0.53	2	0.50
Rosen 1989	29	0.47	19	0.00	30	0.12	29	0.36	48	0.06	30	0.15
Rubinstein 1939	47	0.41	32	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.19	58	0.05	36	0.10
Rubinstein 1952	46	0.41	28	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.05	63	0.04	66	0.04
Rubinstein 1966	33	0.45	66	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.06	62	0.04	48	0.05
Rudanovskaya 2007	62	0.29	43	0.00	63	0.03	64	0.03	60	0.04	67	0.03
Shebanova 2002	4	0.58	3	0.12	4	0.22	5	0.73	3	0.67	1	0.70
Smith 1975	54	0.38	36	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.05	56	0.04
Sztompka 1959	59	0.33	27	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	60	0.05	57	0.04
Tanyel 1992	16	0.52	21	0.00	13	0.12	14	0.53	61	0.05	26	0.16
Tsujii 2005	7	0.57	5	0.10	7	0.31	8	0.66	39	0.09	8	0.24
Uninsky 1959	9	0.55	12	0.01	19	0.10	13	0.56	58	0.05	23	0.17
Vardi 1988	21	0.51	48	0.00	20	0.12	24	0.45	50	0.06	24	0.16
Wasowski 1980	37	0.44	67	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	39	0.08	38	0.06
Zimerman 1975	24	0.50	50	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.24	54	0.06	35	0.12
Average	1	0.63	2	0.16	2	0.30	1	0.83	56	0.06	11	0.22
Random 1	67	-0.04	61	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	27	0.13	60	0.04
Random 2	65	0.09	53	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	1	0.70	32	0.14
Random 3	66	0.00	54	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	30	0.10	61	0.04

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).