Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.65	3	0.03	17	0.11	14	0.55	3	0.66	6	0.60
Ax 1995		23	0.63	40	0.00	25	0.11	24	0.38	35	0.12	34	0.21
Bacha 1998		49	0.51	55	0.00	51	0.09	41	0.09	32	0.20	44	0.13
Barbosa 1983		31	0.60	33	0.00	38	0.08	46	0.08	23	0.27	41	0.15
BenOr 1989		21	0.64	7	0.01	24	0.10	20	0.47	24	0.32	22	0.39
Biret 1990		42	0.55	45	0.00	41	0.12	35	0.12	33	0.15	45	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		32	0.60	52	0.00	30	0.09	30	0.21	30	0.22	32	0.21
Chiu 1999		51	0.49	56	0.00	47	0.08	48	0.08	6	0.62	31	0.22
Clidat 1994		38	0.56	2	0.09	9	0.17	18	0.50	2	0.60	10	0.55
Cohen 1997		61	0.36	26	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	30	0.14	56	0.08
Cortot 1951		63	0.34	59	0.00	64	0.05	55	0.05	40	0.07	57	0.06
Csalog 1996		45	0.54	62	0.00	48	0.09	43	0.09	35	0.09	52	0.09
Czerny 1989		41	0.56	46	0.00	42	0.13	34	0.13	40	0.08	49	0.10
Ezaki 2006		20	0.64	14	0.00	19	0.14	21	0.40	15	0.48	17	0.44
Falvay 1989		2	0.71	10	0.01	3	0.16	5	0.72	24	0.41	11	0.54
Fiorentino 1962		34	0.60	31	0.00	39	0.11	37	0.11	43	0.09	51	0.10
Fliere 1977		48	0.52	58	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	31	0.14	46	0.11
Fou 1978		19	0.64	11	0.01	12	0.14	16	0.53	21	0.44	15	0.48
Francois 1956		37	0.57	21	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.22	10	0.43	25	0.31
Goldenweiser 1946		58	0.39	27	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	59	0.05	63	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.43	53	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	39	0.07	61	0.05
Groot 1988		47	0.53	16	0.00	49	0.11	38	0.11	46	0.07	53	0.09
Hatto 1993		6	0.69	9	0.01	8	0.19	7	0.70	10	0.65	4	0.67
Hatto 1997		3	0.70	4	0.03	5	0.24	2	0.75	9	0.69	1	0.72
Horszowski 1983		64	0.32	30	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	39	0.05	62	0.04
Indjic 2001		5	0.69	13	0.00	6	0.20	4	0.74	11	0.65	3	0.69
Katin 1996		15	0.65	25	0.00	20	0.10	17	0.52	29	0.29	21	0.39
Kiepura 1999		43	0.55	65	0.00	44	0.07	52	0.07	42	0.09	54	0.08
Korecka 1992		52	0.46	32	0.00	52	0.11	36	0.11	37	0.10	48	0.10
Kushner 1990		25	0.62	35	0.00	23	0.13	23	0.38	19	0.43	20	0.40
Lilamand 2001		53	0.44	17	0.00	54	0.04	63	0.04	8	0.53	42	0.15
Luisada 1990		30	0.61	57	0.00	36	0.09	42	0.09	23	0.46	37	0.20
Luisada 2008		33	0.60	19	0.00	32	0.07	33	0.15	20	0.54	27	0.28
Lushtak 2004		13	0.66	41	0.00	14	0.11	9	0.63	15	0.50	9	0.56
Malcuzynski 1951		12	0.66	47	0.00	18	0.12	19	0.48	35	0.11	30	0.23
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.66	39	0.00	16	0.11	13	0.56	32	0.14	26	0.28
Magaloff 1977		60	0.38	63	0.00	60	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.05
Magin 1975		24	0.63	29	0.00	27	0.13	26	0.37	22	0.39	23	0.38
Meguri 1997		54	0.43	66	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	46	0.05	65	0.04
Milkina 1970		4	0.70	18	0.00	2	0.22	3	0.75	15	0.49	5	0.61
Mohovich 1999		40	0.56	42	0.00	37	0.08	50	0.08	18	0.35	39	0.17
Nezu 2005		8	0.69	28	0.00	7	0.18	6	0.71	10	0.74	2	0.72
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Olejniczak 1990		17	0.64	48	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.54	19	0.43	16	0.48
Osinska 1989		27	0.61	37	0.00	33	0.08	32	0.15	37	0.12	43	0.13
Perlemuter 1992		59	0.38	49	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.04	64	0.04
Poblocka 1999		22	0.64	43	0.00	21	0.13	25	0.37	23	0.47	18	0.42
Rangell 2001		46	0.53	60	0.00	50	0.09	44	0.09	19	0.49	35	0.21
Richter 1960		56	0.42	36	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	36	0.07	59	0.05
Richter 1961		62	0.36	50	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	39	0.06	58	0.05
Rosen 1989		39	0.56	44	0.00	40	0.10	39	0.10	40	0.07	55	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.59	34	0.00	34	0.08	49	0.08	26	0.40	38	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.61	54	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.23	26	0.27	29	0.25
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.62	23	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.19	28	0.23	33	0.21
Rudanovskaya 2007		57	0.41	51	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	26	0.32	47	0.11
Shebanova 2002		50	0.51	12	0.01	43	0.08	51	0.08	16	0.48	36	0.20
Smith 1975		18	0.64	8	0.01	26	0.16	22	0.39	14	0.42	19	0.40
Sztompka 1959		44	0.54	20	0.00	45	0.08	47	0.08	28	0.30	40	0.15
Tanyel 1992		10	0.67	15	0.00	13	0.14	10	0.63	19	0.43	14	0.52
Tsujii 2005		7	0.69	5	0.02	4	0.22	8	0.68	16	0.49	7	0.58
Uninsky 1959		11	0.67	38	0.00	11	0.15	12	0.59	14	0.53	8	0.56
Vardi 1988		28	0.61	22	0.00	22	0.10	27	0.31	29	0.32	24	0.31
Wasowski 1980		35	0.59	61	0.00	35	0.09	40	0.09	7	0.70	28	0.25
Zimerman 1975		9	0.67	6	0.01	10	0.15	11	0.61	18	0.46	13	0.53
Average		1	0.79	1	0.70	1	0.69	1	0.89	26	0.33	12	0.54
Random 1		67	-0.02	24	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	45	0.04	67	0.02
Random 2		65	0.02	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	10	0.52	50	0.10
Random 3		66	0.01	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	36	0.06	66	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).