Kiepura 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		42	0.55	42	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	51	0.05	60	0.05
Ax 1995		2	0.72	3	0.03	2	0.41	2	0.81	9	0.71	1	0.76
Bacha 1998		51	0.47	33	0.00	53	0.11	41	0.11	43	0.07	49	0.09
Barbosa 1983		28	0.61	13	0.01	35	0.14	35	0.14	21	0.35	28	0.22
BenOr 1989		25	0.62	27	0.00	33	0.13	31	0.24	38	0.10	39	0.15
Biret 1990		34	0.59	17	0.00	34	0.13	38	0.13	26	0.28	32	0.19
Brailowsky 1960		32	0.59	41	0.00	26	0.09	28	0.30	35	0.11	33	0.18
Chiu 1999		60	0.39	24	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	59	0.04	64	0.04
Clidat 1994		48	0.49	40	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	35	0.08	54	0.07
Cohen 1997		64	0.28	61	0.00	64	0.05	53	0.05	51	0.05	61	0.05
Cortot 1951		55	0.44	47	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	6	0.58	36	0.17
Csalog 1996		36	0.57	23	0.00	40	0.14	34	0.14	24	0.35	29	0.22
Czerny 1989		8	0.69	4	0.03	3	0.21	8	0.68	5	0.74	2	0.71
Ezaki 2006		12	0.64	31	0.00	21	0.09	27	0.33	23	0.42	18	0.37
Falvay 1989		6	0.69	9	0.01	10	0.31	9	0.68	29	0.34	11	0.48
Fiorentino 1962		10	0.67	10	0.01	7	0.17	10	0.66	15	0.53	8	0.59
Fliere 1977		45	0.54	18	0.00	25	0.09	33	0.23	32	0.13	35	0.17
Fou 1978		3	0.70	7	0.01	6	0.20	3	0.75	10	0.63	3	0.69
Francois 1956		49	0.49	45	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	47	0.07	56	0.06
Goldenweiser 1946		47	0.49	46	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.45	38	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		50	0.48	55	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	35	0.08	55	0.07
Groot 1988		11	0.65	8	0.01	11	0.28	11	0.61	11	0.55	9	0.58
Hatto 1993		14	0.63	53	0.00	29	0.12	25	0.35	36	0.09	34	0.18
Hatto 1997		17	0.63	52	0.00	32	0.11	29	0.26	47	0.07	44	0.13
Horszowski 1983		63	0.32	58	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	44	0.05	57	0.05
Indjic 2001		13	0.64	32	0.00	27	0.09	23	0.37	33	0.16	25	0.24
Katin 1996		26	0.61	16	0.00	15	0.11	15	0.43	30	0.25	20	0.33
Kiepura 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Korecka 1992		16	0.63	38	0.00	28	0.11	26	0.33	3	0.72	10	0.49
Kushner 1990		46	0.53	64	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	47	0.07	53	0.07
Lilamand 2001		57	0.43	37	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	15	0.40	41	0.14
Luisada 1990		35	0.58	25	0.00	39	0.13	37	0.13	28	0.30	31	0.20
Luisada 2008		38	0.56	12	0.01	42	0.09	45	0.09	40	0.09	50	0.09
Lushtak 2004		18	0.63	28	0.00	12	0.11	13	0.45	28	0.22	22	0.31
Malcuzynski 1951		5	0.69	2	0.05	5	0.23	4	0.72	12	0.55	4	0.63
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.68	5	0.02	4	0.17	5	0.72	14	0.50	7	0.60
Magaloff 1977		52	0.46	22	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	18	0.42	42	0.14
Magin 1975		20	0.63	6	0.02	19	0.08	18	0.39	18	0.47	14	0.43
Meguri 1997		53	0.45	63	0.00	52	0.09	44	0.09	30	0.27	37	0.16
Milkina 1970		40	0.55	36	0.00	38	0.11	40	0.11	41	0.11	46	0.11
Mohovich 1999		44	0.55	19	0.00	41	0.09	43	0.09	34	0.09	51	0.09
Nezu 2005		30	0.60	39	0.00	36	0.12	39	0.12	46	0.08	47	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		43	0.55	57	0.00	43	0.09	42	0.09	52	0.07	52	0.08
Olejniczak 1990		23	0.62	54	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.37	33	0.16	26	0.24
Osinska 1989		7	0.69	21	0.00	8	0.27	6	0.69	19	0.52	6	0.60
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.37	60	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	24	0.21	48	0.09
Poblocka 1999		22	0.62	14	0.00	18	0.08	14	0.44	22	0.51	12	0.47
Rangell 2001		54	0.44	43	0.00	56	0.05	60	0.05	41	0.06	62	0.05
Richter 1960		56	0.43	50	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	43	0.05	58	0.05
Richter 1961		62	0.35	56	0.00	57	0.04	64	0.04	55	0.05	63	0.04
Rosen 1989		27	0.61	35	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.24	21	0.41	23	0.31
Rubinstein 1939		37	0.57	20	0.00	13	0.11	17	0.41	24	0.43	15	0.42
Rubinstein 1952		31	0.60	51	0.00	17	0.08	16	0.42	27	0.25	21	0.32
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.63	26	0.00	14	0.15	12	0.49	23	0.33	16	0.40
Rudanovskaya 2007		59	0.39	30	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	44	0.06	59	0.05
Shebanova 2002		58	0.42	49	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	45	0.04	65	0.04
Smith 1975		33	0.59	29	0.00	16	0.09	20	0.38	23	0.36	19	0.37
Sztompka 1959		39	0.55	44	0.00	37	0.13	36	0.13	15	0.53	24	0.26
Tanyel 1992		29	0.60	65	0.00	24	0.08	21	0.38	34	0.12	30	0.21
Tsujii 2005		24	0.62	48	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.24	41	0.08	43	0.14
Uninsky 1959		15	0.63	34	0.00	20	0.08	24	0.35	32	0.15	27	0.23
Vardi 1988		19	0.63	15	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.39	23	0.40	17	0.39
Wasowski 1980		41	0.55	59	0.00	44	0.06	48	0.06	25	0.35	40	0.14
Zimerman 1975		4	0.70	11	0.01	9	0.19	7	0.69	17	0.54	5	0.61
Average		1	0.79	1	0.74	1	0.72	1	0.90	29	0.25	13	0.47
Random 1		65	0.02	66	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	5	0.45	45	0.12
Random 2		66	-0.05	62	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	42	0.05	66	0.02
Random 3		67	-0.06	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	65	0.02	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).