Osinska 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.85	41	0.00	7	0.14	4	0.57	7	0.54	10	0.55
Ax 1995		5	0.86	11	0.01	10	0.10	11	0.51	5	0.52	16	0.51
Bacha 1998		39	0.71	62	0.00	43	0.07	37	0.07	8	0.48	34	0.18
Barbosa 1983		51	0.67	29	0.00	38	0.06	43	0.06	30	0.16	47	0.10
BenOr 1989		56	0.62	16	0.01	36	0.09	34	0.09	16	0.35	35	0.18
Biret 1990		23	0.81	25	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.30	9	0.56	23	0.41
Brailowsky 1960		33	0.75	56	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.20	3	0.54	27	0.33
Chiu 1999		58	0.59	51	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	57	0.04	64	0.04
Clidat 1994		14	0.83	31	0.00	23	0.18	23	0.37	17	0.40	26	0.38
Cohen 1997		60	0.59	59	0.00	60	0.04	56	0.04	19	0.37	43	0.12
Cortot 1951		64	0.48	44	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	11	0.44	41	0.13
Csalog 1996		25	0.78	32	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.18	10	0.39	31	0.26
Czerny 1989		32	0.75	7	0.02	30	0.08	30	0.22	12	0.34	30	0.27
Ezaki 2006		3	0.87	47	0.00	11	0.13	12	0.50	4	0.64	4	0.57
Falvay 1989		16	0.83	3	0.04	2	0.22	2	0.68	4	0.58	2	0.63
Fiorentino 1962		22	0.82	15	0.01	24	0.20	18	0.44	13	0.50	18	0.47
Fliere 1977		13	0.83	54	0.00	18	0.12	24	0.35	9	0.52	22	0.43
Fou 1978		35	0.74	26	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.06	34	0.09	54	0.07
Francois 1956		61	0.58	65	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.06	63	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		62	0.55	48	0.00	64	0.06	46	0.06	36	0.07	58	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		59	0.59	39	0.00	51	0.04	59	0.04	30	0.15	52	0.08
Groot 1988		48	0.68	28	0.00	40	0.05	50	0.05	15	0.22	48	0.10
Hatto 1993		19	0.82	24	0.00	14	0.10	5	0.54	4	0.61	6	0.57
Hatto 1997		17	0.83	19	0.00	19	0.12	10	0.51	5	0.59	8	0.55
Horszowski 1983		53	0.65	57	0.00	46	0.06	45	0.06	14	0.29	40	0.13
Indjic 2001		18	0.83	22	0.00	20	0.18	8	0.52	4	0.60	7	0.56
Katin 1996		28	0.77	23	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.15	29	0.25	32	0.19
Kiepura 1999		55	0.64	45	0.00	50	0.04	60	0.04	17	0.29	44	0.11
Korecka 1992		40	0.71	63	0.00	53	0.03	63	0.03	14	0.40	45	0.11
Kushner 1990		49	0.68	43	0.00	39	0.05	47	0.05	13	0.38	37	0.14
Lilamand 2001		43	0.70	61	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	41	0.05	62	0.05
Luisada 1990		41	0.70	33	0.00	37	0.06	42	0.06	11	0.46	36	0.17
Luisada 2008		46	0.68	50	0.00	41	0.05	48	0.05	17	0.40	38	0.14
Lushtak 2004		26	0.78	6	0.03	3	0.18	14	0.48	4	0.64	9	0.55
Malcuzynski 1951		2	0.88	8	0.01	6	0.19	9	0.51	7	0.58	12	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.85	4	0.04	5	0.18	13	0.49	8	0.56	13	0.52
Magaloff 1977		54	0.64	60	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	36	0.07	59	0.06
Magin 1975		21	0.82	20	0.00	26	0.09	25	0.35	15	0.43	25	0.39
Meguri 1997		63	0.52	38	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	27	0.14	49	0.09
Milkina 1970		27	0.77	9	0.01	25	0.13	26	0.33	28	0.31	28	0.32
Mohovich 1999		15	0.83	2	0.05	4	0.15	15	0.48	6	0.55	15	0.51
Nezu 2005		12	0.84	5	0.04	8	0.12	6	0.53	3	0.70	3	0.61
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.70	36	0.00	56	0.05	49	0.05	52	0.05	61	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		20	0.82	18	0.01	15	0.10	17	0.45	10	0.46	19	0.45
Osinska 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.61	40	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	55	0.04	65	0.03
Poblocka 1999		9	0.85	30	0.00	16	0.13	7	0.52	6	0.62	5	0.57
Rangell 2001		11	0.84	17	0.01	17	0.10	19	0.43	7	0.62	14	0.52
Richter 1960		29	0.77	27	0.00	21	0.16	21	0.42	11	0.46	20	0.44
Richter 1961		34	0.74	55	0.00	22	0.11	22	0.37	13	0.43	24	0.40
Rosen 1989		38	0.73	46	0.00	45	0.06	44	0.06	14	0.33	39	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.74	21	0.00	34	0.07	38	0.07	32	0.13	46	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		45	0.70	34	0.00	48	0.08	35	0.08	40	0.07	57	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.74	49	0.00	44	0.07	39	0.07	36	0.09	51	0.08
Rudanovskaya 2007		52	0.67	52	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	31	0.14	56	0.07
Shebanova 2002		24	0.79	42	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.25	29	0.15	33	0.19
Smith 1975		50	0.67	58	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	29	0.17	50	0.08
Sztompka 1959		44	0.70	14	0.01	54	0.05	51	0.05	23	0.27	42	0.12
Tanyel 1992		4	0.87	12	0.01	12	0.14	20	0.42	2	0.54	17	0.48
Tsujii 2005		6	0.86	35	0.00	9	0.11	3	0.58	21	0.33	21	0.44
Uninsky 1959		31	0.76	37	0.00	47	0.08	36	0.08	36	0.07	55	0.07
Vardi 1988		30	0.77	13	0.01	28	0.08	29	0.22	11	0.48	29	0.32
Wasowski 1980		47	0.68	53	0.00	52	0.03	64	0.03	25	0.18	53	0.07
Zimerman 1975		10	0.85	10	0.01	13	0.12	16	0.45	2	0.67	11	0.55
Average		1	0.91	1	0.62	1	0.61	1	0.86	2	0.73	1	0.79
Random 1		66	-0.11	66	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	59	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		65	-0.03	67	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	32	0.11	60	0.06
Random 3		67	-0.14	64	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	40	0.06	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).