Milkina 1970

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   14  0.8310  0.037  0.2211  0.5711  0.4416  0.50
Ax 1995   11  0.8518  0.0112  0.1110  0.584  0.5311  0.55
Bacha 1998   53  0.6559  0.0060  0.0552  0.0552  0.0464  0.04
Barbosa 1983   56  0.6460  0.0015  0.1221  0.435  0.5317  0.48
BenOr 1989   62  0.5419  0.0057  0.0463  0.0461  0.0466  0.04
Biret 1990   42  0.7225  0.0033  0.0733  0.1327  0.2036  0.16
Brailowsky 1960   31  0.7650  0.0047  0.0544  0.0520  0.2045  0.10
Chiu 1999   13  0.8413  0.0214  0.1314  0.525  0.6110  0.56
Clidat 1994   12  0.8421  0.008  0.188  0.619  0.569  0.58
Cohen 1997   50  0.6753  0.0054  0.0460  0.0410  0.5039  0.14
Cortot 1951   64  0.2649  0.0064  0.0557  0.0536  0.0757  0.06
Csalog 1996   25  0.7937  0.0041  0.0550  0.0526  0.2344  0.11
Czerny 1989   30  0.7747  0.0037  0.0554  0.0524  0.2443  0.11
Ezaki 2006   15  0.8328  0.0026  0.0825  0.3523  0.3226  0.33
Falvay 1989   45  0.7120  0.0038  0.0551  0.0535  0.0854  0.06
Fiorentino 1962   5  0.892  0.122  0.166  0.672  0.704  0.68
Fliere 1977   17  0.8235  0.0018  0.1322  0.3919  0.3824  0.38
Fou 1978   26  0.795  0.0516  0.1616  0.497  0.5313  0.51
Francois 1956   29  0.7732  0.0031  0.1429  0.307  0.6419  0.44
Goldenweiser 1946   63  0.4365  0.0063  0.0462  0.0451  0.0462  0.04
Gornostaeva 1994   61  0.5757  0.0048  0.0641  0.0617  0.4235  0.16
Groot 1988   37  0.7562  0.0040  0.0559  0.0532  0.1153  0.07
Hatto 1993   22  0.8151  0.0020  0.0717  0.4521  0.4220  0.43
Hatto 1997   21  0.8114  0.0122  0.1020  0.4322  0.3823  0.40
Horszowski 1983   44  0.7163  0.0061  0.0545  0.0560  0.0461  0.04
Indjic 2001   20  0.8133  0.0021  0.1118  0.4422  0.3922  0.41
Katin 1996   3  0.903  0.104  0.214  0.692  0.712  0.70
Kiepura 1999   58  0.6242  0.0051  0.0548  0.0513  0.3141  0.12
Korecka 1992   60  0.5945  0.0062  0.0639  0.0641  0.0655  0.06
Kushner 1990   59  0.6212  0.0323  0.0731  0.206  0.4328  0.29
Lilamand 2001   47  0.6823  0.0043  0.0547  0.0527  0.1946  0.10
Luisada 1990   57  0.6427  0.0058  0.0461  0.0434  0.0760  0.05
Luisada 2008   54  0.6430  0.0059  0.0558  0.0541  0.0559  0.05
Lushtak 2004   39  0.7348  0.0046  0.0637  0.0631  0.1548  0.09
Malcuzynski 1951   33  0.7639  0.0027  0.0926  0.3425  0.2529  0.29
Malcuzynski 1961   46  0.7029  0.0028  0.1030  0.3022  0.2430  0.27
Magaloff 1977   23  0.8140  0.0030  0.1324  0.357  0.5718  0.45
Magin 1975   49  0.6854  0.0055  0.0549  0.0561  0.0463  0.04
Meguri 1997   55  0.6461  0.0035  0.0638  0.0659  0.0458  0.05
Milkina 1970   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Mohovich 1999   8  0.868  0.0310  0.245  0.682  0.645  0.66
Nezu 2005   40  0.7317  0.0124  0.0727  0.3329  0.2131  0.26
Ohlsson 1999   10  0.867  0.0413  0.1313  0.553  0.628  0.58
Olejniczak 1990   43  0.7138  0.0044  0.0556  0.0527  0.2147  0.10
Osinska 1989   27  0.7715  0.0129  0.1328  0.3126  0.3327  0.32
Perlemuter 1992   38  0.7346  0.0053  0.0553  0.0516  0.3738  0.14
Poblocka 1999   16  0.8226  0.0025  0.0723  0.3724  0.3925  0.38
Rangell 2001   36  0.7544  0.0050  0.0934  0.0943  0.0652  0.07
Richter 1960   48  0.6864  0.0049  0.0835  0.0823  0.3037  0.15
Richter 1961   41  0.7355  0.0032  0.0832  0.1820  0.3432  0.25
Rosen 1989   24  0.7911  0.0339  0.0640  0.067  0.4633  0.17
Rubinstein 1939   1  0.921  0.291  0.292  0.723  0.711  0.71
Rubinstein 1952   7  0.879  0.036  0.227  0.653  0.666  0.65
Rubinstein 1966   2  0.916  0.055  0.163  0.713  0.673  0.69
Rudanovskaya 2007   32  0.7634  0.0036  0.0555  0.0511  0.4934  0.16
Shebanova 2002   9  0.8652  0.0011  0.1712  0.569  0.4515  0.50
Smith 1975   35  0.7541  0.0045  0.0642  0.0621  0.2840  0.13
Sztompka 1959   51  0.6643  0.0056  0.0464  0.0456  0.0465  0.04
Tanyel 1992   34  0.7516  0.0134  0.0636  0.0632  0.1449  0.09
Tsujii 2005   6  0.8831  0.009  0.179  0.5912  0.4414  0.51
Uninsky 1959   19  0.8122  0.0019  0.0819  0.4313  0.4221  0.42
Vardi 1988   18  0.8224  0.0017  0.1715  0.494  0.6012  0.54
Wasowski 1980   52  0.6536  0.0052  0.0546  0.0532  0.1050  0.07
Zimerman 1975   28  0.7758  0.0042  0.0543  0.0520  0.3142  0.12
Average   4  0.894  0.073  0.211  0.7518  0.517  0.62
Random 1   67  -0.1067  0.0066  0.0266  0.0219  0.2351  0.07
Random 2   66  -0.0566  0.0065  0.0265  0.0241  0.0567  0.03
Random 3   65  -0.0556  0.0067  0.0167  0.0113  0.3756  0.06

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).