Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.85	5	0.02	2	0.14	2	0.65	5	0.54	3	0.59
Ax 1995		8	0.85	25	0.00	16	0.10	12	0.50	14	0.41	17	0.45
Bacha 1998		40	0.75	29	0.00	34	0.06	43	0.06	9	0.47	33	0.17
Barbosa 1983		57	0.66	40	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.15	23	0.37	31	0.24
BenOr 1989		58	0.65	42	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	32	0.14	53	0.08
Biret 1990		31	0.79	63	0.00	39	0.08	36	0.08	20	0.34	37	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		37	0.76	33	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.06	19	0.22	47	0.11
Chiu 1999		54	0.70	51	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	34	0.07	58	0.05
Clidat 1994		6	0.86	15	0.01	9	0.19	6	0.56	10	0.56	6	0.56
Cohen 1997		62	0.62	52	0.00	62	0.06	47	0.06	25	0.23	46	0.12
Cortot 1951		64	0.44	38	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	33	0.12	54	0.07
Csalog 1996		25	0.81	26	0.00	40	0.08	35	0.08	20	0.31	36	0.16
Czerny 1989		34	0.78	53	0.00	36	0.06	50	0.06	28	0.20	48	0.11
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		21	0.82	31	0.00	18	0.10	17	0.45	16	0.39	20	0.42
Fiorentino 1962		5	0.87	16	0.01	8	0.14	7	0.55	9	0.60	5	0.57
Fliere 1977		11	0.85	41	0.00	19	0.11	19	0.44	17	0.40	19	0.42
Fou 1978		27	0.81	46	0.00	29	0.11	24	0.31	24	0.35	27	0.33
Francois 1956		55	0.69	28	0.00	53	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.07	56	0.06
Goldenweiser 1946		63	0.55	58	0.00	64	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.05	57	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.63	30	0.00	24	0.08	27	0.30	1	0.65	18	0.44
Groot 1988		32	0.79	22	0.00	42	0.07	37	0.07	13	0.25	44	0.13
Hatto 1993		17	0.84	60	0.00	12	0.10	10	0.51	15	0.50	10	0.50
Hatto 1997		13	0.84	55	0.00	15	0.15	13	0.50	16	0.49	11	0.49
Horszowski 1983		42	0.75	56	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.13	5	0.48	30	0.25
Indjic 2001		14	0.84	64	0.00	14	0.15	11	0.50	16	0.49	12	0.49
Katin 1996		19	0.82	36	0.00	38	0.07	40	0.07	27	0.25	42	0.13
Kiepura 1999		59	0.65	6	0.01	54	0.04	64	0.04	22	0.27	50	0.10
Korecka 1992		50	0.71	14	0.01	59	0.04	63	0.04	13	0.41	40	0.13
Kushner 1990		60	0.63	65	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	46	0.04	64	0.04
Lilamand 2001		51	0.71	48	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	42	0.05	62	0.05
Luisada 1990		48	0.72	21	0.00	43	0.07	39	0.07	20	0.29	38	0.14
Luisada 2008		49	0.72	57	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	21	0.28	49	0.11
Lushtak 2004		28	0.80	19	0.01	22	0.10	22	0.34	15	0.44	22	0.39
Malcuzynski 1951		15	0.84	7	0.01	4	0.15	8	0.53	13	0.52	8	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		30	0.79	12	0.01	10	0.15	15	0.46	15	0.44	16	0.45
Magaloff 1977		44	0.73	62	0.00	46	0.07	38	0.07	25	0.25	43	0.13
Magin 1975		22	0.82	35	0.00	25	0.10	21	0.35	10	0.48	21	0.41
Meguri 1997		56	0.68	3	0.04	7	0.15	30	0.27	33	0.09	35	0.16
Milkina 1970		18	0.83	27	0.00	27	0.09	23	0.32	25	0.35	28	0.33
Mohovich 1999		7	0.85	4	0.03	11	0.16	9	0.52	11	0.47	13	0.49
Nezu 2005		24	0.81	32	0.00	13	0.11	14	0.49	13	0.44	15	0.46
Ohlsson 1999		35	0.78	59	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	44	0.06	61	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		36	0.78	20	0.01	41	0.08	34	0.08	17	0.35	34	0.17
Osinska 1989		4	0.87	9	0.01	6	0.16	4	0.64	12	0.50	4	0.57
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.70	24	0.00	61	0.06	44	0.06	30	0.18	51	0.10
Poblocka 1999		3	0.88	18	0.01	5	0.17	5	0.61	11	0.61	2	0.61
Rangell 2001		10	0.85	44	0.00	20	0.12	16	0.46	11	0.53	14	0.49
Richter 1960		43	0.75	49	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.30	14	0.43	24	0.36
Richter 1961		38	0.76	34	0.00	23	0.12	25	0.31	11	0.45	23	0.37
Rosen 1989		45	0.73	39	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.06	63	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		26	0.81	43	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.13	27	0.24	32	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.75	13	0.01	35	0.06	49	0.06	25	0.29	45	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.82	10	0.01	30	0.15	29	0.29	18	0.42	25	0.35
Rudanovskaya 2007		47	0.73	17	0.01	57	0.05	54	0.05	34	0.08	55	0.06
Shebanova 2002		12	0.84	54	0.00	21	0.15	20	0.44	26	0.22	29	0.31
Smith 1975		39	0.76	50	0.00	47	0.04	59	0.04	23	0.23	52	0.10
Sztompka 1959		52	0.70	23	0.00	60	0.05	55	0.05	40	0.05	60	0.05
Tanyel 1992		20	0.82	11	0.01	26	0.09	26	0.30	13	0.41	26	0.35
Tsujii 2005		2	0.91	8	0.01	3	0.14	3	0.65	11	0.47	7	0.55
Uninsky 1959		33	0.78	47	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	46	0.05	59	0.05
Vardi 1988		29	0.79	45	0.00	37	0.07	41	0.07	23	0.25	41	0.13
Wasowski 1980		46	0.73	37	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	17	0.30	39	0.13
Zimerman 1975		16	0.84	2	0.05	17	0.10	18	0.45	6	0.57	9	0.51
Average		1	0.93	1	0.64	1	0.63	1	0.77	12	0.58	1	0.67
Random 1		66	-0.13	66	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	63	0.02	66	0.02
Random 2		65	-0.05	67	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	45	0.04	65	0.03
Random 3		67	-0.14	61	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	45	0.04	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).