Tanyel 1992

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.77	40	0.00	14	0.08	20	0.33	32	0.18	25	0.24
Ax 1995		8	0.81	23	0.01	15	0.08	19	0.35	18	0.38	9	0.36
Bacha 1998		47	0.65	47	0.00	48	0.04	51	0.04	35	0.07	48	0.05
Barbosa 1983		53	0.61	46	0.00	43	0.04	53	0.04	50	0.05	61	0.04
BenOr 1989		51	0.62	8	0.05	19	0.06	32	0.13	16	0.34	28	0.21
Biret 1990		15	0.79	55	0.00	26	0.08	21	0.28	11	0.46	10	0.36
Brailowsky 1960		11	0.80	7	0.05	3	0.15	4	0.47	1	0.63	2	0.54
Chiu 1999		59	0.57	50	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	51	0.05	55	0.04
Clidat 1994		12	0.79	14	0.02	18	0.08	18	0.35	26	0.22	21	0.28
Cohen 1997		48	0.65	54	0.00	52	0.05	47	0.05	13	0.45	34	0.15
Cortot 1951		63	0.46	61	0.00	63	0.05	39	0.05	28	0.19	41	0.10
Csalog 1996		3	0.83	18	0.01	8	0.13	13	0.39	6	0.42	8	0.40
Czerny 1989		52	0.62	38	0.00	61	0.04	50	0.04	55	0.05	58	0.04
Ezaki 2006		7	0.82	11	0.02	16	0.08	12	0.41	25	0.30	11	0.35
Falvay 1989		18	0.76	10	0.03	12	0.06	26	0.23	29	0.16	29	0.19
Fiorentino 1962		24	0.75	21	0.01	24	0.08	28	0.21	31	0.16	32	0.18
Fliere 1977		13	0.79	13	0.02	11	0.08	14	0.37	26	0.22	20	0.29
Fou 1978		45	0.66	45	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	60	0.05	57	0.04
Francois 1956		60	0.55	19	0.01	58	0.03	62	0.03	58	0.04	65	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		55	0.61	36	0.00	53	0.05	40	0.05	18	0.37	35	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.53	52	0.00	57	0.03	60	0.03	62	0.04	64	0.03
Groot 1988		37	0.68	12	0.02	36	0.06	36	0.06	30	0.12	44	0.08
Hatto 1993		26	0.75	39	0.00	22	0.11	7	0.47	25	0.23	15	0.33
Hatto 1997		19	0.76	26	0.01	20	0.06	6	0.47	24	0.26	12	0.35
Horszowski 1983		39	0.68	64	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.06	15	0.25	36	0.12
Indjic 2001		20	0.76	33	0.00	21	0.08	5	0.47	24	0.24	14	0.34
Katin 1996		36	0.69	42	0.00	54	0.04	49	0.04	62	0.04	59	0.04
Kiepura 1999		57	0.60	51	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	49	0.05	54	0.04
Korecka 1992		33	0.71	60	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.05	7	0.46	33	0.15
Kushner 1990		29	0.75	4	0.08	5	0.17	8	0.46	1	0.65	1	0.55
Lilamand 2001		32	0.74	25	0.01	31	0.08	30	0.15	18	0.25	30	0.19
Luisada 1990		54	0.61	34	0.00	39	0.05	46	0.05	38	0.06	52	0.05
Luisada 2008		56	0.61	32	0.00	46	0.04	52	0.04	43	0.05	62	0.04
Lushtak 2004		34	0.71	17	0.01	25	0.08	23	0.25	21	0.31	22	0.28
Malcuzynski 1951		4	0.83	3	0.09	4	0.16	9	0.45	19	0.40	7	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.82	5	0.06	2	0.11	2	0.50	11	0.47	5	0.48
Magaloff 1977		58	0.59	62	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	60	0.04	63	0.03
Magin 1975		6	0.82	2	0.10	7	0.16	10	0.44	6	0.55	3	0.49
Meguri 1997		62	0.52	48	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.06	47	0.05	50	0.05
Milkina 1970		23	0.75	16	0.01	32	0.07	31	0.14	35	0.06	43	0.09
Mohovich 1999		14	0.79	22	0.01	6	0.14	15	0.37	22	0.34	13	0.35
Nezu 2005		28	0.75	6	0.06	10	0.08	16	0.37	25	0.25	19	0.30
Ohlsson 1999		30	0.75	43	0.00	41	0.04	55	0.04	48	0.05	60	0.04
Olejniczak 1990		27	0.75	15	0.02	27	0.09	22	0.26	13	0.39	17	0.32
Osinska 1989		1	0.87	1	0.18	1	0.18	1	0.54	19	0.42	4	0.48
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.63	59	0.00	62	0.05	45	0.05	51	0.05	47	0.05
Poblocka 1999		16	0.78	35	0.00	23	0.08	17	0.36	27	0.29	16	0.32
Rangell 2001		10	0.80	30	0.00	9	0.11	11	0.42	14	0.46	6	0.44
Richter 1960		46	0.66	41	0.00	29	0.09	27	0.21	19	0.32	23	0.26
Richter 1961		50	0.63	58	0.00	13	0.06	29	0.19	23	0.25	26	0.22
Rosen 1989		25	0.75	44	0.00	33	0.10	34	0.10	18	0.31	31	0.18
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.67	20	0.01	44	0.04	48	0.04	60	0.05	56	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		44	0.66	37	0.00	45	0.05	41	0.05	41	0.07	46	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		43	0.67	31	0.00	50	0.05	43	0.05	53	0.05	51	0.05
Rudanovskaya 2007		42	0.67	49	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	39	0.06	53	0.05
Shebanova 2002		31	0.74	57	0.00	30	0.12	25	0.23	58	0.05	38	0.11
Smith 1975		22	0.76	28	0.01	35	0.13	33	0.13	13	0.38	27	0.22
Sztompka 1959		35	0.71	56	0.00	40	0.04	56	0.04	24	0.27	39	0.10
Tanyel 1992		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tsujii 2005		2	0.83	9	0.03	17	0.09	3	0.50	31	0.12	24	0.24
Uninsky 1959		9	0.81	24	0.01	28	0.09	24	0.24	14	0.38	18	0.30
Vardi 1988		41	0.67	27	0.01	51	0.05	44	0.05	42	0.06	49	0.05
Wasowski 1980		38	0.68	29	0.00	47	0.04	59	0.04	23	0.19	42	0.09
Zimerman 1975		21	0.76	53	0.00	34	0.09	35	0.09	29	0.15	37	0.12
Random 1		66	-0.11	63	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	55	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		64	-0.04	65	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	26	0.19	45	0.06
Random 3		65	-0.08	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	7	0.46	40	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).