Rubinstein 1966

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		10	0.84	30	0.00	9	0.19	7	0.57	16	0.39	12	0.47
Ax 1995		14	0.83	14	0.01	15	0.12	12	0.51	23	0.32	16	0.40
Bacha 1998		41	0.68	56	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	38	0.06	42	0.06
Barbosa 1983		32	0.71	37	0.00	12	0.21	14	0.46	8	0.50	11	0.48
BenOr 1989		60	0.50	52	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05
Biret 1990		37	0.70	19	0.00	35	0.11	33	0.11	41	0.06	39	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		39	0.69	47	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	33	0.09	40	0.07
Chiu 1999		6	0.86	3	0.09	5	0.21	9	0.55	3	0.62	6	0.58
Clidat 1994		7	0.85	29	0.00	7	0.18	6	0.57	6	0.59	7	0.58
Cohen 1997		54	0.58	57	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	41	0.07	46	0.06
Cortot 1951		63	0.21	64	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	44	0.05	64	0.04
Csalog 1996		33	0.71	38	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	44	0.05	53	0.05
Czerny 1989		19	0.77	16	0.01	14	0.15	15	0.45	5	0.45	14	0.45
Ezaki 2006		15	0.82	24	0.00	18	0.15	17	0.42	28	0.29	17	0.35
Falvay 1989		44	0.66	34	0.00	39	0.06	46	0.06	47	0.05	49	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		5	0.89	12	0.01	6	0.21	4	0.61	3	0.66	5	0.63
Fliere 1977		8	0.85	4	0.02	8	0.17	8	0.57	15	0.45	10	0.51
Fou 1978		13	0.83	8	0.01	10	0.17	10	0.53	7	0.53	9	0.53
Francois 1956		24	0.75	53	0.00	24	0.07	30	0.25	16	0.48	19	0.35
Goldenweiser 1946		62	0.28	35	0.00	62	0.03	63	0.03	57	0.04	65	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.70	58	0.00	16	0.09	20	0.40	3	0.56	13	0.47
Groot 1988		42	0.67	36	0.00	43	0.05	52	0.05	51	0.04	63	0.04
Hatto 1993		26	0.74	21	0.00	29	0.10	22	0.36	36	0.07	28	0.16
Hatto 1997		27	0.74	17	0.00	31	0.13	25	0.32	35	0.07	29	0.15
Horszowski 1983		51	0.63	62	0.00	53	0.06	42	0.06	52	0.05	47	0.05
Indjic 2001		25	0.74	33	0.00	30	0.13	24	0.35	39	0.06	32	0.14
Katin 1996		4	0.90	5	0.02	3	0.28	5	0.59	3	0.69	4	0.64
Kiepura 1999		49	0.64	49	0.00	36	0.07	38	0.07	11	0.35	27	0.16
Korecka 1992		61	0.46	42	0.00	61	0.06	43	0.06	55	0.05	51	0.05
Kushner 1990		57	0.55	10	0.01	49	0.05	59	0.05	61	0.03	60	0.04
Lilamand 2001		56	0.56	23	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	45	0.05	61	0.04
Luisada 1990		58	0.54	25	0.00	59	0.07	40	0.07	34	0.06	44	0.06
Luisada 2008		55	0.56	31	0.00	58	0.05	54	0.05	44	0.05	54	0.05
Lushtak 2004		40	0.68	60	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.06	53	0.05	56	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		22	0.76	43	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.27	34	0.06	33	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		31	0.71	20	0.00	32	0.12	31	0.23	40	0.06	35	0.12
Magaloff 1977		11	0.83	41	0.00	11	0.15	13	0.50	5	0.58	8	0.54
Magin 1975		45	0.65	28	0.00	50	0.06	44	0.06	38	0.06	41	0.06
Meguri 1997		53	0.61	44	0.00	23	0.06	32	0.16	42	0.05	36	0.09
Milkina 1970		3	0.91	6	0.01	4	0.26	3	0.67	2	0.71	3	0.69
Mohovich 1999		20	0.77	22	0.00	19	0.09	21	0.37	29	0.18	22	0.26
Nezu 2005		29	0.73	46	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.32	40	0.07	30	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.77	15	0.01	25	0.10	29	0.25	26	0.22	24	0.23
Olejniczak 1990		48	0.64	54	0.00	44	0.05	60	0.05	39	0.06	59	0.05
Osinska 1989		28	0.74	55	0.00	33	0.09	35	0.09	38	0.07	38	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.65	27	0.00	42	0.05	56	0.05	17	0.31	34	0.12
Poblocka 1999		16	0.80	39	0.00	20	0.09	19	0.40	28	0.29	20	0.34
Rangell 2001		36	0.70	61	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	59	0.04	62	0.04
Richter 1960		38	0.70	40	0.00	34	0.10	34	0.10	15	0.36	25	0.19
Richter 1961		23	0.75	63	0.00	21	0.13	23	0.35	17	0.36	18	0.35
Rosen 1989		30	0.73	9	0.01	38	0.08	36	0.08	24	0.27	31	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		1	0.94	2	0.23	2	0.51	2	0.76	1	0.79	2	0.77
Rubinstein 1952		2	0.94	1	0.47	1	0.46	1	0.77	1	0.79	1	0.78
Rubinstein 1966		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rudanovskaya 2007		46	0.65	26	0.00	40	0.05	49	0.05	53	0.05	55	0.05
Shebanova 2002		12	0.83	65	0.00	17	0.12	16	0.44	29	0.14	23	0.25
Smith 1975		52	0.62	11	0.01	55	0.06	45	0.06	56	0.04	50	0.05
Sztompka 1959		59	0.53	32	0.00	60	0.07	37	0.07	62	0.03	52	0.05
Tanyel 1992		43	0.67	7	0.01	46	0.05	53	0.05	43	0.05	57	0.05
Tsujii 2005		9	0.84	18	0.00	13	0.14	11	0.52	44	0.06	26	0.18
Uninsky 1959		34	0.71	13	0.01	37	0.07	39	0.07	48	0.05	43	0.06
Vardi 1988		17	0.78	45	0.00	22	0.13	18	0.40	14	0.40	15	0.40
Wasowski 1980		50	0.63	48	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.04	48	0.05
Zimerman 1975		18	0.78	50	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.30	16	0.35	21	0.32
Random 1		64	-0.03	66	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	6	0.42	37	0.09
Random 2		65	-0.06	51	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	36	0.06	66	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.10	59	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	16	0.32	45	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).