Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.74	23	0.00	6	0.15	8	0.43	57	0.04	24	0.13
Ax 1995		9	0.77	17	0.01	18	0.09	10	0.38	36	0.08	16	0.17
Bacha 1998		51	0.61	42	0.00	52	0.04	51	0.04	56	0.04	60	0.04
Barbosa 1983		60	0.46	57	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	51	0.05	63	0.04
BenOr 1989		61	0.43	22	0.00	62	0.06	38	0.06	63	0.04	50	0.05
Biret 1990		42	0.64	30	0.00	47	0.06	41	0.06	63	0.04	51	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		10	0.76	51	0.00	13	0.11	16	0.32	13	0.33	6	0.32
Chiu 1999		40	0.65	20	0.01	27	0.09	31	0.18	37	0.06	32	0.10
Clidat 1994		15	0.74	64	0.00	20	0.10	22	0.28	52	0.06	23	0.13
Cohen 1997		50	0.61	61	0.00	49	0.04	57	0.04	16	0.40	25	0.13
Cortot 1951		63	0.24	34	0.00	63	0.04	48	0.04	38	0.06	53	0.05
Csalog 1996		2	0.83	11	0.02	2	0.19	6	0.47	7	0.42	3	0.44
Czerny 1989		18	0.73	39	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.25	32	0.10	17	0.16
Ezaki 2006		21	0.73	37	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.06	59	0.04	40	0.05
Falvay 1989		36	0.69	6	0.04	7	0.10	20	0.29	28	0.16	10	0.22
Fiorentino 1962		16	0.74	14	0.01	25	0.09	19	0.30	63	0.04	31	0.11
Fliere 1977		1	0.84	1	0.32	1	0.32	1	0.68	13	0.48	2	0.57
Fou 1978		49	0.61	53	0.00	48	0.04	50	0.04	59	0.05	59	0.04
Francois 1956		33	0.69	7	0.03	29	0.08	25	0.26	22	0.38	7	0.31
Goldenweiser 1946		58	0.51	8	0.03	44	0.04	52	0.04	30	0.17	36	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.42	40	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04	66	0.04
Groot 1988		17	0.74	10	0.02	8	0.10	9	0.40	43	0.05	21	0.14
Hatto 1993		35	0.69	62	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.06	60	0.04	52	0.05
Hatto 1997		34	0.69	55	0.00	42	0.06	37	0.06	61	0.04	46	0.05
Horszowski 1983		38	0.67	49	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.05	56	0.04
Indjic 2001		32	0.69	65	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.06	61	0.04	49	0.05
Katin 1996		29	0.70	60	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	58	0.04	43	0.05
Kiepura 1999		59	0.47	25	0.00	58	0.03	63	0.03	46	0.05	55	0.04
Korecka 1992		54	0.57	33	0.00	61	0.04	49	0.04	48	0.05	61	0.04
Kushner 1990		57	0.51	63	0.00	45	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.04	62	0.04
Lilamand 2001		47	0.62	32	0.00	40	0.05	46	0.05	36	0.06	45	0.05
Luisada 1990		52	0.58	36	0.00	43	0.05	47	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.05
Luisada 2008		55	0.56	47	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.04	64	0.04
Lushtak 2004		37	0.68	35	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.09	38	0.06	37	0.07
Malcuzynski 1951		26	0.72	15	0.01	14	0.09	17	0.32	47	0.05	26	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.64	44	0.00	23	0.08	29	0.21	46	0.05	33	0.10
Magaloff 1977		48	0.62	46	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	53	0.05	65	0.04
Magin 1975		46	0.63	50	0.00	55	0.04	54	0.04	35	0.06	41	0.05
Meguri 1997		53	0.57	21	0.01	33	0.08	35	0.08	50	0.05	39	0.06
Milkina 1970		6	0.79	9	0.03	17	0.11	7	0.46	39	0.06	15	0.17
Mohovich 1999		3	0.82	18	0.01	3	0.23	4	0.54	27	0.20	5	0.33
Nezu 2005		44	0.64	27	0.00	30	0.09	27	0.22	46	0.06	30	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.74	13	0.02	28	0.08	28	0.21	28	0.18	13	0.19
Olejniczak 1990		39	0.65	41	0.00	46	0.04	53	0.04	38	0.06	54	0.05
Osinska 1989		19	0.73	19	0.01	21	0.11	13	0.33	43	0.06	20	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.65	52	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	36	0.06	58	0.04
Poblocka 1999		11	0.75	45	0.00	22	0.12	23	0.28	45	0.05	27	0.12
Rangell 2001		27	0.71	31	0.00	37	0.09	34	0.09	40	0.06	38	0.07
Richter 1960		28	0.71	26	0.00	19	0.10	15	0.32	24	0.29	8	0.30
Richter 1961		20	0.73	43	0.00	15	0.12	11	0.37	31	0.12	11	0.21
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1939		5	0.80	5	0.04	9	0.10	5	0.47	24	0.25	4	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		30	0.70	12	0.02	11	0.12	14	0.32	35	0.08	18	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.73	3	0.09	10	0.08	24	0.27	36	0.08	19	0.15
Rudanovskaya 2007		8	0.78	2	0.12	5	0.18	3	0.56	1	0.62	1	0.59
Shebanova 2002		7	0.79	58	0.00	16	0.17	12	0.36	54	0.05	22	0.13
Smith 1975		25	0.72	16	0.01	32	0.09	32	0.17	25	0.22	12	0.19
Sztompka 1959		43	0.64	66	0.00	54	0.06	44	0.06	42	0.05	44	0.05
Tanyel 1992		12	0.75	24	0.00	12	0.06	18	0.31	34	0.10	14	0.18
Tsujii 2005		4	0.82	4	0.07	4	0.15	2	0.62	30	0.12	9	0.27
Uninsky 1959		23	0.73	38	0.00	35	0.06	43	0.06	46	0.05	42	0.05
Vardi 1988		22	0.73	28	0.00	24	0.08	21	0.29	55	0.05	28	0.12
Wasowski 1980		56	0.56	54	0.00	53	0.05	45	0.05	55	0.04	57	0.04
Zimerman 1975		31	0.70	29	0.00	31	0.11	30	0.21	37	0.07	29	0.12
Random 1		66	-0.07	59	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	20	0.22	48	0.05
Random 2		64	0.00	48	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	9	0.39	35	0.09
Random 3		65	0.00	56	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	2	0.54	34	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).