Richter 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		10	0.77	9	0.00	3	0.19	3	0.60	13	0.40	4	0.49
Ax 1995		4	0.80	7	0.01	11	0.14	9	0.48	14	0.41	7	0.44
Bacha 1998		34	0.64	53	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.06	20	0.40	29	0.15
Barbosa 1983		56	0.47	35	0.00	51	0.06	44	0.06	63	0.04	50	0.05
BenOr 1989		62	0.30	60	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.05	62	0.04
Biret 1990		41	0.62	18	0.00	44	0.04	54	0.04	45	0.05	63	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		27	0.68	45	0.00	34	0.06	40	0.06	24	0.15	37	0.09
Chiu 1999		43	0.61	20	0.00	47	0.04	53	0.04	40	0.05	54	0.04
Clidat 1994		6	0.79	49	0.00	9	0.10	7	0.50	14	0.46	5	0.48
Cohen 1997		58	0.43	54	0.00	57	0.04	55	0.04	43	0.06	52	0.05
Cortot 1951		63	0.20	32	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	58	0.04	64	0.04
Csalog 1996		30	0.67	55	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.07	36	0.06	45	0.06
Czerny 1989		7	0.78	40	0.00	8	0.11	20	0.31	12	0.31	17	0.31
Ezaki 2006		12	0.76	11	0.00	16	0.14	10	0.45	24	0.31	11	0.37
Falvay 1989		18	0.74	15	0.00	6	0.14	15	0.39	21	0.29	16	0.34
Fiorentino 1962		19	0.74	46	0.00	20	0.12	16	0.38	37	0.09	27	0.18
Fliere 1977		3	0.82	3	0.01	2	0.34	2	0.61	3	0.62	2	0.61
Fou 1978		26	0.69	36	0.00	25	0.08	24	0.23	28	0.20	23	0.21
Francois 1956		40	0.62	50	0.00	42	0.07	35	0.07	28	0.22	32	0.12
Goldenweiser 1946		59	0.40	43	0.00	63	0.05	49	0.05	53	0.04	53	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.49	41	0.00	45	0.04	61	0.04	43	0.05	61	0.04
Groot 1988		35	0.64	29	0.00	43	0.07	34	0.07	45	0.05	47	0.06
Hatto 1993		17	0.74	27	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.16	46	0.05	42	0.09
Hatto 1997		21	0.74	31	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.15	48	0.05	38	0.09
Horszowski 1983		48	0.59	38	0.00	52	0.05	47	0.05	35	0.08	44	0.06
Indjic 2001		20	0.74	10	0.00	26	0.07	26	0.17	56	0.05	41	0.09
Katin 1996		23	0.73	22	0.00	30	0.08	25	0.20	32	0.16	26	0.18
Kiepura 1999		60	0.39	24	0.00	54	0.07	38	0.07	41	0.05	43	0.06
Korecka 1992		57	0.45	39	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	54	0.05	56	0.04
Kushner 1990		61	0.38	33	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	46	0.04	59	0.04
Lilamand 2001		55	0.47	64	0.00	58	0.05	50	0.05	59	0.04	60	0.04
Luisada 1990		36	0.64	19	0.00	13	0.09	28	0.16	21	0.24	25	0.20
Luisada 2008		49	0.59	34	0.00	40	0.05	46	0.05	23	0.27	31	0.12
Lushtak 2004		29	0.67	30	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.14	41	0.06	39	0.09
Malcuzynski 1951		25	0.72	59	0.00	12	0.09	11	0.45	20	0.31	12	0.37
Malcuzynski 1961		39	0.62	13	0.00	19	0.12	18	0.34	23	0.21	20	0.27
Magaloff 1977		44	0.61	25	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	50	0.05	51	0.05
Magin 1975		47	0.60	63	0.00	46	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.05	55	0.04
Meguri 1997		54	0.48	28	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.06	61	0.04	49	0.05
Milkina 1970		24	0.73	51	0.00	24	0.11	19	0.34	31	0.18	21	0.25
Mohovich 1999		11	0.76	26	0.00	10	0.10	8	0.48	18	0.37	8	0.42
Nezu 2005		32	0.66	47	0.00	14	0.10	14	0.40	31	0.19	19	0.28
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.61	61	0.00	48	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.04
Olejniczak 1990		42	0.62	4	0.01	35	0.07	33	0.07	24	0.24	30	0.13
Osinska 1989		16	0.74	52	0.00	15	0.09	12	0.43	21	0.37	9	0.40
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.50	14	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	63	0.03	65	0.03
Poblocka 1999		5	0.79	5	0.01	4	0.18	6	0.55	13	0.54	3	0.54
Rangell 2001		15	0.74	21	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.31	17	0.42	13	0.36
Richter 1960		1	0.95	1	0.89	1	0.88	1	0.92	1	0.91	1	0.91
Richter 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		22	0.73	42	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.12	11	0.37	24	0.21
Rubinstein 1939		9	0.77	6	0.01	17	0.11	13	0.41	21	0.37	10	0.39
Rubinstein 1952		31	0.67	65	0.00	29	0.06	32	0.11	33	0.09	36	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.75	37	0.00	21	0.11	17	0.36	23	0.35	14	0.35
Rudanovskaya 2007		33	0.65	62	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.06	27	0.19	33	0.11
Shebanova 2002		2	0.83	17	0.00	5	0.17	4	0.58	13	0.34	6	0.44
Smith 1975		50	0.52	58	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	63	0.03	66	0.03
Sztompka 1959		52	0.49	48	0.00	61	0.05	48	0.05	43	0.05	48	0.05
Tanyel 1992		37	0.63	44	0.00	18	0.10	23	0.25	29	0.19	22	0.22
Tsujii 2005		8	0.78	23	0.00	7	0.11	5	0.57	28	0.22	15	0.35
Uninsky 1959		38	0.63	16	0.00	50	0.05	45	0.05	57	0.04	57	0.04
Vardi 1988		14	0.75	8	0.00	23	0.12	22	0.26	18	0.35	18	0.30
Wasowski 1980		46	0.60	12	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.07	14	0.32	28	0.15
Zimerman 1975		28	0.67	2	0.01	33	0.06	42	0.06	27	0.19	34	0.11
Random 1		65	-0.01	56	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	9	0.41	40	0.09
Random 2		64	0.00	66	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	5	0.53	35	0.10
Random 3		66	-0.11	57	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	15	0.33	46	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).