Fliere 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.88	1	0.16	1	0.16	2	0.69	2	0.59	1	0.64
Ax 1995		8	0.85	14	0.02	16	0.10	10	0.50	11	0.43	14	0.46
Bacha 1998		32	0.75	53	0.00	35	0.10	35	0.10	10	0.45	29	0.21
Barbosa 1983		50	0.65	42	0.00	49	0.05	45	0.05	43	0.05	58	0.05
BenOr 1989		61	0.53	30	0.00	58	0.06	43	0.06	53	0.05	60	0.05
Biret 1990		44	0.69	52	0.00	51	0.03	63	0.03	43	0.05	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		31	0.76	43	0.00	25	0.07	29	0.17	14	0.32	27	0.23
Chiu 1999		40	0.72	10	0.03	28	0.06	30	0.13	28	0.25	33	0.18
Clidat 1994		4	0.87	27	0.00	6	0.11	6	0.56	7	0.58	6	0.57
Cohen 1997		51	0.64	59	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	22	0.31	39	0.11
Cortot 1951		62	0.41	40	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	27	0.19	42	0.10
Csalog 1996		17	0.82	51	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.11	15	0.34	32	0.19
Czerny 1989		22	0.79	33	0.00	22	0.09	19	0.37	1	0.55	15	0.45
Ezaki 2006		10	0.85	36	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.40	18	0.44	17	0.42
Falvay 1989		26	0.78	4	0.09	5	0.20	14	0.46	9	0.46	13	0.46
Fiorentino 1962		5	0.86	32	0.00	15	0.09	9	0.52	9	0.58	9	0.55
Fliere 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fou 1978		20	0.80	48	0.00	33	0.07	40	0.07	29	0.20	36	0.12
Francois 1956		29	0.76	28	0.00	29	0.07	25	0.22	15	0.48	24	0.32
Goldenweiser 1946		63	0.40	23	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	54	0.04	61	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		45	0.69	16	0.01	37	0.07	37	0.07	4	0.55	31	0.20
Groot 1988		46	0.68	37	0.00	48	0.07	38	0.07	35	0.06	50	0.06
Hatto 1993		35	0.75	19	0.01	38	0.08	36	0.08	52	0.05	51	0.06
Hatto 1997		34	0.75	50	0.00	40	0.10	34	0.10	46	0.05	47	0.07
Horszowski 1983		52	0.64	56	0.00	50	0.05	53	0.05	33	0.10	46	0.07
Indjic 2001		33	0.75	45	0.00	39	0.11	32	0.11	43	0.05	49	0.07
Katin 1996		21	0.79	55	0.00	36	0.07	39	0.07	24	0.28	34	0.14
Kiepura 1999		53	0.63	34	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	28	0.21	40	0.10
Korecka 1992		58	0.59	63	0.00	61	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.05	54	0.05
Kushner 1990		60	0.56	58	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	53	0.04	62	0.04
Lilamand 2001		55	0.60	57	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	50	0.05	63	0.04
Luisada 1990		56	0.60	60	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	31	0.11	48	0.07
Luisada 2008		49	0.65	49	0.00	44	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.31	37	0.12
Lushtak 2004		39	0.73	35	0.00	30	0.07	28	0.19	22	0.30	26	0.24
Malcuzynski 1951		6	0.86	18	0.01	12	0.13	11	0.49	13	0.52	11	0.50
Malcuzynski 1961		19	0.81	15	0.01	21	0.10	21	0.31	17	0.33	22	0.32
Magaloff 1977		37	0.74	44	0.00	41	0.05	44	0.05	27	0.23	38	0.11
Magin 1975		42	0.71	24	0.00	43	0.05	48	0.05	28	0.21	41	0.10
Meguri 1997		57	0.59	17	0.01	24	0.08	27	0.22	52	0.04	43	0.09
Milkina 1970		14	0.82	41	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.38	21	0.39	20	0.38
Mohovich 1999		27	0.78	6	0.06	11	0.10	17	0.39	15	0.39	19	0.39
Nezu 2005		28	0.77	46	0.00	26	0.09	22	0.27	32	0.17	30	0.21
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.74	31	0.00	45	0.06	42	0.06	49	0.05	57	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		48	0.65	29	0.00	53	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.04	65	0.04
Osinska 1989		13	0.83	25	0.00	14	0.10	8	0.52	23	0.35	16	0.43
Perlemuter 1992		59	0.58	39	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	34	0.06	53	0.05
Poblocka 1999		3	0.87	12	0.03	4	0.18	4	0.58	4	0.64	2	0.61
Rangell 2001		15	0.82	21	0.01	23	0.11	20	0.36	13	0.50	18	0.42
Richter 1960		25	0.79	20	0.01	7	0.12	5	0.56	2	0.64	4	0.60
Richter 1961		16	0.82	5	0.09	3	0.19	3	0.62	2	0.61	3	0.61
Rosen 1989		12	0.84	13	0.02	18	0.13	13	0.48	1	0.68	7	0.57
Rubinstein 1939		9	0.85	3	0.11	8	0.11	12	0.49	10	0.61	8	0.55
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.79	8	0.03	10	0.11	23	0.27	19	0.41	21	0.33
Rubinstein 1966		11	0.85	7	0.06	9	0.13	15	0.45	8	0.57	10	0.51
Rudanovskaya 2007		41	0.72	11	0.03	31	0.07	31	0.13	19	0.42	28	0.23
Shebanova 2002		7	0.86	62	0.00	13	0.11	7	0.54	10	0.42	12	0.48
Smith 1975		43	0.70	38	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	32	0.14	44	0.08
Sztompka 1959		54	0.60	47	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	38	0.05	56	0.05
Tanyel 1992		23	0.79	26	0.00	20	0.12	26	0.22	14	0.37	25	0.29
Tsujii 2005		1	0.89	2	0.13	2	0.19	1	0.69	8	0.50	5	0.59
Uninsky 1959		36	0.74	9	0.03	42	0.05	47	0.05	41	0.06	55	0.05
Vardi 1988		30	0.76	61	0.00	34	0.07	41	0.07	23	0.25	35	0.13
Wasowski 1980		47	0.68	54	0.00	52	0.04	62	0.04	35	0.07	52	0.05
Zimerman 1975		18	0.81	22	0.00	27	0.11	24	0.24	10	0.43	23	0.32
Random 1		65	-0.08	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	37	0.05	66	0.03
Random 2		64	-0.01	64	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	16	0.34	45	0.08
Random 3		66	-0.13	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	23	0.21	59	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).