Wasowski 1980

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   13  0.6629  0.0016  0.1215  0.5041  0.0716  0.19
Ax 1995   27  0.6156  0.0035  0.0737  0.0751  0.0737  0.07
Bacha 1998   44  0.5550  0.0048  0.0640  0.0649  0.0553  0.05
Barbosa 1983   15  0.6513  0.0115  0.1114  0.5150  0.0619  0.17
BenOr 1989   6  0.677  0.046  0.158  0.6429  0.292  0.43
Biret 1990   50  0.5457  0.0052  0.0644  0.0645  0.0647  0.06
Brailowsky 1960   7  0.678  0.049  0.163  0.7020  0.351  0.49
Chiu 1999   46  0.5551  0.0053  0.0834  0.0845  0.0635  0.07
Clidat 1994   10  0.6710  0.048  0.176  0.6737  0.095  0.25
Cohen 1997   60  0.3948  0.0060  0.0463  0.0462  0.0463  0.04
Cortot 1951   61  0.3762  0.0063  0.0553  0.0558  0.0464  0.04
Csalog 1996   45  0.5547  0.0050  0.0556  0.0561  0.0462  0.04
Czerny 1989   40  0.5749  0.0037  0.0736  0.0736  0.0736  0.07
Ezaki 2006   11  0.6725  0.0018  0.1116  0.4556  0.0524  0.15
Falvay 1989   4  0.692  0.162  0.232  0.7257  0.0515  0.19
Fiorentino 1962   18  0.6433  0.0019  0.1618  0.4438  0.1110  0.22
Fliere 1977   33  0.5961  0.0043  0.0558  0.0547  0.0651  0.05
Fou 1978   8  0.674  0.095  0.1513  0.5736  0.097  0.23
Francois 1956   53  0.5158  0.0051  0.0555  0.0551  0.0559  0.05
Goldenweiser 1946   63  0.3359  0.0062  0.0462  0.0441  0.0650  0.05
Gornostaeva 1994   54  0.5154  0.0057  0.0557  0.0547  0.0558  0.05
Groot 1988   22  0.6227  0.0024  0.0920  0.3836  0.0722  0.16
Hatto 1993   29  0.6063  0.0028  0.1127  0.3038  0.0923  0.16
Hatto 1997   28  0.6138  0.0026  0.1025  0.3341  0.0725  0.15
Horszowski 1983   59  0.4544  0.0059  0.0835  0.0843  0.0538  0.06
Indjic 2001   25  0.6141  0.0025  0.0924  0.3442  0.0727  0.15
Katin 1996   30  0.6040  0.0038  0.0642  0.0653  0.0640  0.06
Kiepura 1999   36  0.5822  0.0041  0.0650  0.0646  0.0549  0.05
Korecka 1992   37  0.5834  0.0045  0.0647  0.0632  0.1733  0.10
Kushner 1990   23  0.6115  0.0121  0.1022  0.3542  0.0720  0.16
Lilamand 2001   57  0.4946  0.0056  0.0651  0.0646  0.0556  0.05
Luisada 1990   31  0.5914  0.0114  0.1119  0.3935  0.1012  0.20
Luisada 2008   39  0.5730  0.0040  0.0648  0.0646  0.0643  0.06
Lushtak 2004   24  0.6118  0.0117  0.1026  0.3150  0.0726  0.15
Malcuzynski 1951   5  0.685  0.087  0.217  0.6743  0.0711  0.22
Malcuzynski 1961   12  0.669  0.0413  0.289  0.6238  0.089  0.22
Magaloff 1977   43  0.5524  0.0046  0.0646  0.0646  0.0644  0.06
Magin 1975   19  0.6316  0.0122  0.1121  0.3534  0.0817  0.17
Meguri 1997   51  0.5331  0.0047  0.0554  0.0553  0.0555  0.05
Milkina 1970   35  0.5919  0.0127  0.0929  0.2558  0.0530  0.11
Mohovich 1999   49  0.5464  0.0044  0.0649  0.0652  0.0646  0.06
Nezu 2005   2  0.696  0.083  0.171  0.7338  0.094  0.26
Ohlsson 1999   26  0.6112  0.0123  0.1023  0.3434  0.0918  0.17
Olejniczak 1990   14  0.6611  0.0211  0.204  0.6732  0.163  0.33
Osinska 1989   20  0.6339  0.0029  0.0828  0.2758  0.0529  0.12
Perlemuter 1992   62  0.3760  0.0061  0.0461  0.0452  0.0460  0.04
Poblocka 1999   9  0.6721  0.0012  0.2011  0.5952  0.0614  0.19
Rangell 2001   21  0.6235  0.0031  0.0830  0.2240  0.0828  0.13
Richter 1960   52  0.5228  0.0049  0.0833  0.0858  0.0442  0.06
Richter 1961   48  0.5437  0.0033  0.0739  0.0742  0.0639  0.06
Rosen 1989   55  0.5066  0.0055  0.0559  0.0559  0.0557  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   42  0.5552  0.0042  0.0552  0.0558  0.0461  0.04
Rubinstein 1952   41  0.5736  0.0039  0.0643  0.0649  0.0648  0.06
Rubinstein 1966   32  0.5943  0.0036  0.0738  0.0759  0.0541  0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007   58  0.4932  0.0058  0.0645  0.0643  0.0645  0.06
Shebanova 2002   17  0.6420  0.0110  0.1710  0.6035  0.106  0.24
Smith 1975   56  0.5053  0.0054  0.0560  0.0556  0.0552  0.05
Sztompka 1959   47  0.5423  0.0032  0.0732  0.1440  0.0734  0.10
Tanyel 1992   16  0.6417  0.0120  0.0917  0.4547  0.0621  0.16
Tsujii 2005   1  0.701  0.171  0.175  0.6743  0.0613  0.20
Uninsky 1959   38  0.5755  0.0034  0.0641  0.0659  0.0454  0.05
Vardi 1988   34  0.5926  0.0030  0.0731  0.1636  0.0731  0.11
Wasowski 1980   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Zimerman 1975   3  0.693  0.104  0.1012  0.5734  0.098  0.23
Random 1   66  -0.0745  0.0066  0.0166  0.0154  0.0366  0.02
Random 2   65  -0.0465  0.0065  0.0265  0.0243  0.0565  0.03
Random 3   64  -0.0142  0.0064  0.0364  0.039  0.3832  0.11

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).