Rudanovskaya 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.62	3	0.11	3	0.25	2	0.68	42	0.07	11	0.22
Ax 1995		13	0.63	14	0.01	7	0.15	14	0.49	58	0.06	21	0.17
Bacha 1998		58	0.46	63	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	34	0.06	46	0.05
Barbosa 1983		61	0.42	48	0.00	36	0.06	42	0.06	57	0.04	49	0.05
BenOr 1989		59	0.44	27	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.05
Biret 1990		47	0.53	45	0.00	48	0.06	34	0.06	48	0.06	41	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.53	61	0.00	34	0.06	39	0.06	62	0.04	44	0.05
Chiu 1999		23	0.61	10	0.02	14	0.11	17	0.46	29	0.24	4	0.33
Clidat 1994		14	0.63	8	0.03	16	0.10	10	0.52	36	0.09	9	0.22
Cohen 1997		56	0.47	42	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	18	0.38	28	0.14
Cortot 1951		63	0.23	62	0.00	63	0.06	45	0.06	64	0.03	64	0.04
Csalog 1996		9	0.66	7	0.03	8	0.14	5	0.59	30	0.17	5	0.32
Czerny 1989		4	0.67	38	0.00	17	0.10	20	0.42	50	0.05	26	0.14
Ezaki 2006		27	0.59	12	0.01	42	0.05	48	0.05	60	0.05	42	0.05
Falvay 1989		6	0.67	13	0.01	12	0.17	13	0.50	39	0.07	15	0.19
Fiorentino 1962		42	0.54	39	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.06	58	0.05	53	0.05
Fliere 1977		11	0.64	4	0.09	5	0.20	11	0.51	36	0.08	12	0.20
Fou 1978		41	0.55	31	0.00	23	0.10	24	0.30	44	0.07	25	0.14
Francois 1956		21	0.61	30	0.00	4	0.18	6	0.59	24	0.25	1	0.38
Goldenweiser 1946		19	0.62	15	0.01	50	0.05	51	0.05	30	0.12	33	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.35	18	0.01	59	0.05	57	0.05	63	0.04	62	0.04
Groot 1988		2	0.69	2	0.17	2	0.24	4	0.60	30	0.14	7	0.29
Hatto 1993		22	0.61	29	0.00	30	0.09	27	0.27	53	0.06	29	0.13
Hatto 1997		15	0.62	16	0.01	29	0.10	26	0.29	54	0.05	30	0.12
Horszowski 1983		44	0.54	43	0.00	62	0.06	38	0.06	59	0.04	43	0.05
Indjic 2001		16	0.62	17	0.01	27	0.10	22	0.33	50	0.06	27	0.14
Katin 1996		34	0.57	49	0.00	40	0.06	37	0.06	47	0.07	38	0.06
Kiepura 1999		60	0.43	40	0.00	58	0.05	53	0.05	59	0.04	58	0.04
Korecka 1992		53	0.48	46	0.00	60	0.06	41	0.06	53	0.05	47	0.05
Kushner 1990		57	0.46	23	0.00	21	0.10	30	0.25	58	0.04	32	0.10
Lilamand 2001		24	0.61	9	0.02	22	0.11	21	0.34	14	0.34	3	0.34
Luisada 1990		51	0.49	65	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.04	61	0.04
Luisada 2008		55	0.48	52	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.03	65	0.03
Lushtak 2004		38	0.55	44	0.00	28	0.08	25	0.29	41	0.08	23	0.15
Malcuzynski 1951		45	0.54	64	0.00	37	0.05	55	0.05	58	0.05	56	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		52	0.48	60	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	61	0.04	60	0.04
Magaloff 1977		54	0.48	53	0.00	49	0.05	58	0.05	43	0.07	40	0.06
Magin 1975		48	0.51	66	0.00	61	0.06	44	0.06	52	0.06	37	0.06
Meguri 1997		20	0.62	25	0.00	19	0.13	18	0.45	19	0.28	2	0.35
Milkina 1970		26	0.60	47	0.00	20	0.09	19	0.44	51	0.06	22	0.16
Mohovich 1999		7	0.67	6	0.05	13	0.11	9	0.55	38	0.07	14	0.20
Nezu 2005		49	0.50	57	0.00	35	0.05	52	0.05	56	0.06	51	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.67	11	0.01	9	0.12	8	0.56	40	0.07	13	0.20
Olejniczak 1990		32	0.57	21	0.01	33	0.06	33	0.06	63	0.04	57	0.05
Osinska 1989		25	0.60	22	0.01	25	0.08	23	0.32	54	0.06	24	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		31	0.58	51	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	50	0.05	59	0.04
Poblocka 1999		37	0.56	37	0.00	44	0.06	46	0.06	55	0.06	36	0.06
Rangell 2001		43	0.54	50	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.04	63	0.04
Richter 1960		29	0.59	36	0.00	26	0.08	28	0.26	30	0.13	17	0.18
Richter 1961		35	0.57	41	0.00	31	0.12	31	0.23	28	0.12	18	0.17
Rosen 1989		12	0.64	34	0.00	10	0.12	3	0.61	33	0.13	8	0.28
Rubinstein 1939		18	0.62	20	0.01	18	0.11	16	0.47	38	0.08	16	0.19
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.55	35	0.00	24	0.10	29	0.26	57	0.05	31	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.55	33	0.00	39	0.05	50	0.05	42	0.07	39	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		3	0.67	5	0.06	6	0.11	15	0.47	27	0.20	6	0.31
Smith 1975		36	0.57	55	0.00	38	0.05	54	0.05	51	0.06	45	0.05
Sztompka 1959		33	0.57	54	0.00	52	0.06	36	0.06	55	0.05	48	0.05
Tanyel 1992		28	0.59	24	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	62	0.04	34	0.08
Tsujii 2005		1	0.73	1	0.28	1	0.27	1	0.72	42	0.07	10	0.22
Uninsky 1959		8	0.67	32	0.00	15	0.10	12	0.51	51	0.06	19	0.17
Vardi 1988		10	0.66	28	0.00	11	0.16	7	0.57	59	0.05	20	0.17
Wasowski 1980		50	0.49	19	0.01	51	0.06	43	0.06	45	0.06	35	0.06
Zimerman 1975		30	0.58	26	0.00	43	0.06	35	0.06	62	0.04	54	0.05
Random 1		66	-0.07	56	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	42	0.04	66	0.02
Random 2		64	-0.03	58	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	26	0.15	50	0.05
Random 3		65	-0.04	59	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	25	0.14	52	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).