Rubinstein 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		7	0.74	17	0.00	8	0.21	9	0.51	15	0.49	9	0.50
Ax 1995		3	0.79	6	0.02	4	0.38	3	0.79	1	0.77	3	0.78
Bacha 1998		47	0.60	21	0.00	50	0.05	59	0.05	27	0.19	45	0.10
Barbosa 1983		10	0.72	15	0.00	6	0.20	8	0.58	1	0.64	6	0.61
BenOr 1989		49	0.58	28	0.00	46	0.07	42	0.07	36	0.09	47	0.08
Biret 1990		25	0.67	4	0.03	13	0.13	22	0.35	20	0.60	14	0.46
Brailowsky 1960		26	0.67	18	0.00	15	0.09	29	0.25	18	0.40	21	0.32
Chiu 1999		8	0.73	47	0.00	9	0.21	10	0.50	3	0.60	8	0.55
Clidat 1994		22	0.68	42	0.00	22	0.07	23	0.35	26	0.27	22	0.31
Cohen 1997		58	0.52	30	0.00	60	0.05	61	0.05	17	0.39	37	0.14
Cortot 1951		63	0.31	35	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	41	0.05	64	0.05
Csalog 1996		31	0.66	48	0.00	44	0.10	33	0.10	25	0.20	36	0.14
Czerny 1989		37	0.65	55	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.08	20	0.34	33	0.16
Ezaki 2006		35	0.66	36	0.00	36	0.07	40	0.07	46	0.07	48	0.07
Falvay 1989		29	0.67	5	0.03	18	0.08	30	0.24	62	0.04	44	0.10
Fiorentino 1962		13	0.71	26	0.00	16	0.10	15	0.43	26	0.38	17	0.40
Fliere 1977		14	0.71	31	0.00	29	0.10	24	0.34	28	0.30	20	0.32
Fou 1978		12	0.71	10	0.01	11	0.13	12	0.49	22	0.50	10	0.49
Francois 1956		24	0.68	19	0.00	27	0.10	25	0.31	5	0.66	15	0.45
Goldenweiser 1946		62	0.34	16	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	57	0.04	62	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		44	0.62	57	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.07	10	0.49	27	0.19
Groot 1988		42	0.63	40	0.00	40	0.06	46	0.06	46	0.06	60	0.06
Hatto 1993		27	0.67	56	0.00	26	0.12	21	0.38	33	0.10	28	0.19
Hatto 1997		23	0.68	62	0.00	24	0.09	18	0.40	33	0.11	25	0.21
Horszowski 1983		61	0.50	46	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	56	0.04	65	0.04
Indjic 2001		21	0.68	53	0.00	20	0.08	14	0.45	34	0.10	26	0.21
Katin 1996		5	0.77	20	0.00	5	0.35	6	0.68	5	0.72	5	0.70
Kiepura 1999		36	0.65	51	0.00	34	0.06	48	0.06	7	0.56	29	0.18
Korecka 1992		60	0.51	49	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	39	0.07	63	0.05
Kushner 1990		41	0.64	24	0.00	38	0.06	47	0.06	26	0.27	39	0.13
Lilamand 2001		53	0.55	43	0.00	51	0.05	60	0.05	15	0.33	40	0.13
Luisada 1990		59	0.51	34	0.00	58	0.06	50	0.06	42	0.07	57	0.06
Luisada 2008		57	0.54	61	0.00	57	0.08	36	0.08	51	0.05	56	0.06
Lushtak 2004		45	0.61	54	0.00	45	0.06	44	0.06	54	0.06	58	0.06
Malcuzynski 1951		19	0.69	23	0.00	30	0.11	28	0.25	37	0.07	42	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.69	11	0.01	25	0.10	20	0.38	50	0.05	35	0.14
Magaloff 1977		40	0.64	14	0.01	39	0.06	54	0.06	10	0.54	30	0.18
Magin 1975		39	0.64	37	0.00	43	0.09	34	0.09	27	0.19	38	0.13
Meguri 1997		52	0.56	27	0.00	48	0.07	39	0.07	45	0.05	55	0.06
Milkina 1970		4	0.78	25	0.00	3	0.29	4	0.71	3	0.69	4	0.70
Mohovich 1999		38	0.65	50	0.00	28	0.10	27	0.26	21	0.33	23	0.29
Nezu 2005		28	0.67	39	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.18	34	0.10	41	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.72	22	0.00	12	0.16	11	0.49	14	0.50	11	0.49
Olejniczak 1990		43	0.62	58	0.00	41	0.06	45	0.06	45	0.07	61	0.06
Osinska 1989		18	0.70	29	0.00	17	0.09	17	0.41	40	0.07	31	0.17
Perlemuter 1992		56	0.54	38	0.00	56	0.06	52	0.06	6	0.38	34	0.15
Poblocka 1999		17	0.71	9	0.01	23	0.09	19	0.40	24	0.32	19	0.36
Rangell 2001		48	0.60	41	0.00	53	0.06	53	0.06	45	0.07	59	0.06
Richter 1960		55	0.55	59	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	32	0.10	50	0.07
Richter 1961		51	0.56	60	0.00	49	0.05	62	0.05	32	0.09	49	0.07
Rosen 1989		34	0.66	7	0.02	32	0.08	32	0.16	20	0.33	24	0.23
Rubinstein 1939		2	0.82	2	0.08	2	0.58	2	0.81	2	0.80	2	0.80
Rubinstein 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.87	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.87	1	0.87	1	0.87
Rudanovskaya 2007		54	0.55	63	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	29	0.26	43	0.11
Shebanova 2002		33	0.66	52	0.00	35	0.06	43	0.06	37	0.08	51	0.07
Smith 1975		30	0.66	13	0.01	19	0.08	26	0.28	11	0.51	18	0.38
Sztompka 1959		46	0.61	8	0.02	47	0.07	37	0.07	16	0.40	32	0.17
Tanyel 1992		32	0.66	45	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.07	37	0.08	53	0.07
Tsujii 2005		6	0.76	3	0.04	7	0.29	5	0.70	27	0.35	12	0.49
Uninsky 1959		11	0.72	12	0.01	10	0.16	7	0.59	10	0.53	7	0.56
Vardi 1988		16	0.71	32	0.00	14	0.13	13	0.48	11	0.48	13	0.48
Wasowski 1980		50	0.57	44	0.00	55	0.06	49	0.06	43	0.06	54	0.06
Zimerman 1975		15	0.71	33	0.00	21	0.07	16	0.42	23	0.40	16	0.41
Random 1		65	-0.02	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	12	0.42	46	0.09
Random 2		64	0.00	65	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	18	0.26	52	0.07
Random 3		66	-0.03	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	28	0.11	66	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).