Magaloff 1977

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   22  0.5936  0.0029  0.1121  0.2656  0.0627  0.12
Ax 1995   8  0.6421  0.0112  0.147  0.5742  0.099  0.23
Bacha 1998   38  0.5533  0.0043  0.0558  0.0557  0.0550  0.05
Barbosa 1983   18  0.609  0.027  0.198  0.5529  0.283  0.39
BenOr 1989   46  0.5352  0.0044  0.0560  0.0549  0.0659  0.05
Biret 1990   37  0.5643  0.0035  0.0933  0.0959  0.0538  0.07
Brailowsky 1960   19  0.604  0.0620  0.1027  0.2348  0.0722  0.13
Chiu 1999   7  0.6416  0.019  0.1911  0.4917  0.481  0.48
Clidat 1994   13  0.6214  0.0111  0.1612  0.4643  0.0813  0.19
Cohen 1997   62  0.3365  0.0063  0.0555  0.0561  0.0463  0.04
Cortot 1951   63  0.3346  0.0062  0.0462  0.0449  0.0465  0.04
Csalog 1996   43  0.5354  0.0052  0.0556  0.0541  0.0655  0.05
Czerny 1989   25  0.5822  0.0126  0.0722  0.2547  0.0529  0.11
Ezaki 2006   11  0.6213  0.0217  0.1016  0.3937  0.0814  0.18
Falvay 1989   23  0.5917  0.0116  0.0817  0.3652  0.0523  0.13
Fiorentino 1962   1  0.667  0.035  0.204  0.6334  0.125  0.27
Fliere 1977   14  0.6128  0.0025  0.0624  0.2437  0.0721  0.13
Fou 1978   2  0.661  0.281  0.272  0.7027  0.272  0.43
Francois 1956   12  0.6224  0.0113  0.1213  0.4432  0.147  0.25
Goldenweiser 1946   61  0.3719  0.0158  0.0461  0.0425  0.2331  0.10
Gornostaeva 1994   34  0.5718  0.0127  0.0725  0.2422  0.324  0.28
Groot 1988   20  0.5911  0.0219  0.0820  0.2753  0.0528  0.12
Hatto 1993   26  0.5838  0.0018  0.0718  0.3251  0.0620  0.14
Hatto 1997   32  0.5729  0.0032  0.0831  0.1646  0.0730  0.11
Horszowski 1983   57  0.4747  0.0057  0.0745  0.0739  0.0539  0.06
Indjic 2001   30  0.5735  0.0031  0.0930  0.1943  0.0726  0.12
Katin 1996   28  0.5839  0.0024  0.0829  0.2062  0.0533  0.10
Kiepura 1999   36  0.5610  0.0237  0.0934  0.0940  0.0834  0.08
Korecka 1992   59  0.4426  0.0060  0.0647  0.0658  0.0451  0.05
Kushner 1990   53  0.5055  0.0048  0.0650  0.0647  0.0554  0.05
Lilamand 2001   56  0.4837  0.0055  0.0559  0.0548  0.0556  0.05
Luisada 1990   49  0.5225  0.0145  0.0648  0.0654  0.0644  0.06
Luisada 2008   54  0.4832  0.0054  0.0463  0.0450  0.0561  0.04
Lushtak 2004   24  0.5915  0.0122  0.0819  0.3149  0.0718  0.15
Malcuzynski 1951   9  0.636  0.0310  0.186  0.6154  0.0516  0.17
Malcuzynski 1961   10  0.632  0.172  0.221  0.7255  0.0512  0.19
Magaloff 1977   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Magin 1975   42  0.5442  0.0046  0.0652  0.0660  0.0549  0.05
Meguri 1997   27  0.5823  0.0123  0.0728  0.2224  0.2210  0.22
Milkina 1970   16  0.6050  0.0028  0.0723  0.2448  0.0624  0.12
Mohovich 1999   52  0.5162  0.0049  0.0838  0.0845  0.0637  0.07
Nezu 2005   17  0.6057  0.0014  0.1215  0.4255  0.0617  0.16
Ohlsson 1999   21  0.5959  0.0033  0.0740  0.0749  0.0642  0.06
Olejniczak 1990   45  0.5356  0.0042  0.0554  0.0559  0.0560  0.05
Osinska 1989   47  0.5251  0.0047  0.0742  0.0760  0.0448  0.05
Perlemuter 1992   60  0.4463  0.0061  0.0651  0.0653  0.0447  0.05
Poblocka 1999   31  0.5745  0.0034  0.0935  0.0949  0.0635  0.07
Rangell 2001   48  0.5230  0.0053  0.0557  0.0559  0.0464  0.04
Richter 1960   51  0.5127  0.0040  0.0739  0.0753  0.0543  0.06
Richter 1961   41  0.5431  0.0036  0.0936  0.0947  0.0636  0.07
Rosen 1989   40  0.5441  0.0051  0.0653  0.0658  0.0558  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   3  0.663  0.123  0.215  0.6333  0.106  0.25
Rubinstein 1952   6  0.6420  0.018  0.1510  0.5454  0.0615  0.18
Rubinstein 1966   5  0.655  0.036  0.169  0.5433  0.108  0.23
Rudanovskaya 2007   55  0.4858  0.0056  0.0743  0.0758  0.0545  0.06
Shebanova 2002   29  0.5861  0.0030  0.1126  0.2453  0.0625  0.12
Smith 1975   33  0.578  0.0221  0.0932  0.1543  0.0732  0.10
Sztompka 1959   58  0.4549  0.0059  0.0649  0.0663  0.0453  0.05
Tanyel 1992   44  0.5334  0.0050  0.0744  0.0756  0.0546  0.06
Tsujii 2005   4  0.6612  0.024  0.213  0.6551  0.0611  0.20
Uninsky 1959   35  0.5753  0.0039  0.0741  0.0760  0.0452  0.05
Vardi 1988   50  0.5144  0.0038  0.0837  0.0860  0.0541  0.06
Wasowski 1980   39  0.5548  0.0041  0.0646  0.0646  0.0640  0.06
Zimerman 1975   15  0.6040  0.0015  0.0714  0.4258  0.0519  0.14
Random 1   66  -0.0560  0.0066  0.0166  0.0122  0.1762  0.04
Random 2   65  -0.0366  0.0064  0.0264  0.0227  0.1457  0.05
Random 3   64  -0.0364  0.0065  0.0265  0.0233  0.0666  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).