Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.60	19	0.01	44	0.07	42	0.07	54	0.06	58	0.06
Ax 1995		7	0.71	13	0.01	4	0.14	2	0.58	30	0.19	12	0.33
Bacha 1998		59	0.55	66	0.00	54	0.05	57	0.05	43	0.06	61	0.05
Barbosa 1983		57	0.55	11	0.01	30	0.06	32	0.12	49	0.06	46	0.08
BenOr 1989		39	0.63	39	0.00	13	0.09	20	0.28	22	0.42	11	0.34
Biret 1990		5	0.72	4	0.05	8	0.19	8	0.50	7	0.69	3	0.59
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.72	3	0.08	3	0.15	3	0.55	3	0.64	2	0.59
Chiu 1999		53	0.58	58	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	32	0.21	39	0.11
Clidat 1994		37	0.63	36	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.07	54	0.06	55	0.06
Cohen 1997		61	0.44	63	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	54	0.05	62	0.05
Cortot 1951		63	0.42	24	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	9	0.49	29	0.16
Csalog 1996		9	0.71	42	0.00	11	0.13	10	0.46	5	0.63	4	0.54
Czerny 1989		21	0.68	26	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.13	30	0.20	27	0.16
Ezaki 2006		25	0.67	33	0.00	42	0.06	45	0.06	47	0.06	48	0.06
Falvay 1989		1	0.77	1	0.46	1	0.45	1	0.77	11	0.53	1	0.64
Fiorentino 1962		8	0.71	2	0.10	2	0.25	5	0.55	16	0.53	5	0.54
Fliere 1977		45	0.61	47	0.00	36	0.07	40	0.07	49	0.06	49	0.06
Fou 1978		29	0.66	17	0.01	16	0.08	17	0.33	29	0.19	20	0.25
Francois 1956		38	0.63	31	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.15	17	0.37	22	0.24
Goldenweiser 1946		41	0.63	44	0.00	45	0.08	35	0.08	1	0.73	21	0.24
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.43	59	0.00	59	0.06	48	0.06	46	0.05	63	0.05
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		15	0.69	52	0.00	24	0.08	24	0.24	45	0.06	37	0.12
Hatto 1997		13	0.69	51	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.22	51	0.06	40	0.11
Horszowski 1983		54	0.56	55	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	65	0.04
Indjic 2001		11	0.69	57	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.25	38	0.09	31	0.15
Katin 1996		10	0.69	14	0.01	17	0.10	14	0.36	28	0.19	18	0.26
Kiepura 1999		48	0.60	5	0.05	15	0.07	26	0.20	19	0.38	15	0.28
Korecka 1992		52	0.59	32	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	11	0.50	32	0.14
Kushner 1990		33	0.64	9	0.01	14	0.10	12	0.37	14	0.54	7	0.45
Lilamand 2001		55	0.55	35	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	24	0.23	42	0.10
Luisada 1990		36	0.64	15	0.01	46	0.07	37	0.07	28	0.27	33	0.14
Luisada 2008		46	0.61	40	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	30	0.18	43	0.09
Lushtak 2004		31	0.65	27	0.00	20	0.07	21	0.28	48	0.07	34	0.14
Malcuzynski 1951		34	0.64	48	0.00	25	0.08	23	0.25	48	0.06	38	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		51	0.59	37	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.16	60	0.04	44	0.08
Magaloff 1977		50	0.59	53	0.00	50	0.05	53	0.05	20	0.27	36	0.12
Magin 1975		43	0.62	21	0.01	48	0.06	50	0.06	57	0.06	52	0.06
Meguri 1997		27	0.66	25	0.00	41	0.11	33	0.11	5	0.40	23	0.21
Milkina 1970		22	0.68	20	0.01	21	0.08	15	0.35	31	0.19	17	0.26
Mohovich 1999		30	0.65	43	0.00	35	0.07	41	0.07	51	0.06	57	0.06
Nezu 2005		35	0.64	60	0.00	18	0.10	19	0.29	41	0.08	30	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		18	0.69	45	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.07	35	0.09	45	0.08
Olejniczak 1990		14	0.69	18	0.01	22	0.09	18	0.30	27	0.24	16	0.27
Osinska 1989		16	0.69	41	0.00	9	0.14	6	0.52	28	0.20	13	0.32
Perlemuter 1992		56	0.55	54	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	37	0.06	60	0.05
Poblocka 1999		26	0.67	49	0.00	40	0.08	34	0.08	56	0.05	50	0.06
Rangell 2001		49	0.60	50	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	43	0.07	64	0.05
Richter 1960		58	0.55	22	0.01	57	0.07	39	0.07	44	0.06	53	0.06
Richter 1961		60	0.54	56	0.00	56	0.05	59	0.05	38	0.07	51	0.06
Rosen 1989		20	0.68	7	0.02	19	0.08	13	0.37	8	0.51	9	0.43
Rubinstein 1939		19	0.68	10	0.01	12	0.09	16	0.34	32	0.19	19	0.25
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.63	28	0.00	38	0.06	46	0.06	46	0.06	59	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		32	0.65	12	0.01	37	0.06	47	0.06	39	0.08	47	0.07
Rudanovskaya 2007		17	0.69	34	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.14	4	0.60	14	0.29
Shebanova 2002		42	0.62	62	0.00	49	0.05	58	0.05	40	0.07	54	0.06
Smith 1975		28	0.66	46	0.00	34	0.06	49	0.06	19	0.41	26	0.16
Sztompka 1959		24	0.67	38	0.00	33	0.06	44	0.06	9	0.53	24	0.18
Tanyel 1992		12	0.69	6	0.04	5	0.15	7	0.51	29	0.29	10	0.38
Tsujii 2005		3	0.72	29	0.00	10	0.12	11	0.42	57	0.06	28	0.16
Uninsky 1959		2	0.73	8	0.02	7	0.20	4	0.55	15	0.39	6	0.46
Vardi 1988		4	0.72	23	0.00	6	0.14	9	0.49	17	0.40	8	0.44
Wasowski 1980		44	0.62	30	0.00	47	0.07	36	0.07	20	0.38	25	0.16
Zimerman 1975		23	0.67	16	0.01	29	0.06	28	0.15	37	0.08	41	0.11
Random 1		65	-0.02	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	20	0.18	56	0.06
Random 2		66	-0.10	61	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	66	0.01	66	0.01
Random 3		64	0.03	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	2	0.54	35	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).