Wasowski 1980

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   49  0.6036  0.0040  0.0644  0.0646  0.0650  0.06
Ashkenazy 1981   16  0.6816  0.0013  0.1114  0.4542  0.0716  0.18
Beliavsky 2004   40  0.6235  0.0049  0.0550  0.0531  0.1338  0.08
BenOr 1989   6  0.7031  0.007  0.217  0.5739  0.0714  0.20
Biret 1990   53  0.5953  0.0044  0.0548  0.0540  0.0659  0.05
Blet 2003   56  0.5738  0.0055  0.0463  0.0457  0.0462  0.04
Block 1995   54  0.5915  0.0045  0.0646  0.0662  0.0456  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   58  0.5652  0.0059  0.0553  0.0544  0.0844  0.06
Chiu 1999   36  0.6310  0.0117  0.1218  0.3752  0.0522  0.14
Clidat 1994   42  0.6245  0.0047  0.0738  0.0748  0.0649  0.06
Cohen 1997   62  0.4564  0.0063  0.0645  0.0629  0.1931  0.11
Coop 1987   37  0.6342  0.0041  0.0549  0.0547  0.0655  0.05
Cortot 1951   57  0.5623  0.0061  0.0462  0.0426  0.2832  0.11
Czerny 1949   14  0.6818  0.0012  0.1112  0.4841  0.0619  0.17
Czerny 1949b   12  0.6944  0.0014  0.1113  0.4647  0.0618  0.17
Ezaki 2006   4  0.722  0.084  0.223  0.7331  0.153  0.33
Falvay 1989   47  0.6061  0.0057  0.0647  0.0649  0.0645  0.06
Ferenczy 1958   61  0.5156  0.0056  0.0457  0.0456  0.0563  0.04
Fiorentino 1962   29  0.6457  0.0037  0.0837  0.0854  0.0641  0.07
Fliere 1977   11  0.6926  0.008  0.119  0.5141  0.0813  0.20
Fou 1978   2  0.746  0.032  0.332  0.7923  0.281  0.47
Francois 1956   31  0.6412  0.0148  0.0741  0.0743  0.0552  0.06
Hatto 1997   28  0.6432  0.0022  0.1022  0.2444  0.0625  0.12
Horowitz 1971   24  0.6520  0.0020  0.1117  0.3726  0.312  0.34
Horowitz 1985   55  0.5755  0.0050  0.0458  0.0426  0.3328  0.11
Indjic 2001   32  0.6437  0.0025  0.0825  0.2142  0.0727  0.12
Kapell 1951   38  0.6213  0.0142  0.0552  0.0559  0.0461  0.04
Kiepura 1999   18  0.6749  0.0036  0.0740  0.0755  0.0543  0.06
Kilenyi 1937   30  0.6440  0.0028  0.0727  0.1941  0.0726  0.12
Kissin 1993   27  0.6548  0.0023  0.0924  0.2248  0.0630  0.11
Kitain 1937   63  0.4043  0.0062  0.0461  0.0438  0.0758  0.05
Kushner 1990   9  0.693  0.043  0.194  0.7129  0.145  0.32
Levy 1951   46  0.6150  0.0033  0.0933  0.0925  0.2820  0.16
Luisada 1990   21  0.668  0.0126  0.0732  0.1245  0.0639  0.08
Lushtak 2004   10  0.6917  0.0010  0.1111  0.4832  0.186  0.29
Lympany 1968   51  0.6065  0.0053  0.0551  0.0553  0.0553  0.05
Magaloff 1977   19  0.6614  0.0030  0.0728  0.1647  0.0633  0.10
Magaloff 1977b   22  0.6641  0.0031  0.0631  0.1342  0.0636  0.09
Magin 1975   8  0.709  0.0115  0.1216  0.4246  0.0717  0.17
Milkina 1970   15  0.6824  0.0018  0.1015  0.4446  0.0621  0.16
Mohovich 1999   50  0.6058  0.0051  0.0459  0.0457  0.0565  0.04
Nadelmann 1956   33  0.6434  0.0038  0.0935  0.0955  0.0447  0.06
Ohlsson 1999   43  0.6163  0.0043  0.0643  0.0650  0.0646  0.06
Olejniczac 1990   26  0.6546  0.0035  0.0739  0.0756  0.0548  0.06
Olejniczak 1991   23  0.6551  0.0029  0.0726  0.2048  0.0724  0.12
Osinska 1989   3  0.7319  0.006  0.326  0.6947  0.0711  0.22
Paderewski 1912   39  0.6222  0.0046  0.0742  0.0752  0.0551  0.06
Perahia 1994   45  0.617  0.0124  0.0929  0.1520  0.417  0.25
Perlemuter 1986   35  0.6333  0.0027  0.0723  0.2356  0.0529  0.11
Poblocka 1999   7  0.7021  0.009  0.128  0.5346  0.0615  0.18
Rangell 2001   17  0.6725  0.0016  0.0920  0.3553  0.0523  0.13
Risler 1920   60  0.5260  0.0060  0.0460  0.0454  0.0654  0.05
Rosen 1989   48  0.6039  0.0052  0.0554  0.0547  0.0657  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   41  0.625  0.0311  0.1121  0.2918  0.374  0.33
Rubinstein 1952   34  0.6330  0.0034  0.0936  0.0935  0.0642  0.07
Rubinstein 1966   20  0.6627  0.0019  0.1210  0.4932  0.128  0.24
Rummel 1943   52  0.5959  0.0054  0.0555  0.0555  0.0464  0.04
Shebanova 2002   5  0.714  0.045  0.295  0.7139  0.0712  0.22
Smith 1975   25  0.6529  0.0032  0.0830  0.1439  0.0634  0.09
Szpilman 1948   44  0.6128  0.0039  0.0934  0.0950  0.0640  0.07
Uninsky 1971   13  0.6911  0.0121  0.1319  0.3531  0.159  0.23
Wasowski 1980   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Weissenberg 1971   59  0.5647  0.0058  0.0556  0.0562  0.0360  0.04
Average   1  0.791  0.671  0.661  0.9156  0.0610  0.23
Random 1    65  -0.0554  0.0065  0.0265  0.0213  0.3437  0.08
Random 2   64  0.0266  0.0064  0.0364  0.0323  0.2535  0.09
Random 3   66  -0.0662  0.0066  0.0166  0.0139  0.0566  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).