Perahia 1994

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		24	0.57	36	0.00	24	0.10	24	0.34	55	0.05	25	0.13
Ashkenazy 1981		29	0.55	46	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.16	58	0.05	34	0.09
Beliavsky 2004		34	0.54	22	0.00	22	0.09	25	0.29	36	0.08	21	0.15
BenOr 1989		18	0.60	47	0.00	15	0.11	14	0.52	50	0.06	18	0.18
Biret 1990		20	0.59	24	0.00	26	0.10	27	0.29	59	0.04	30	0.11
Blet 2003		45	0.50	65	0.00	47	0.04	57	0.04	40	0.05	58	0.04
Block 1995		58	0.43	29	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	47	0.05	62	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		27	0.56	42	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	39	0.09	36	0.07
Chiu 1999		62	0.40	30	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.04
Clidat 1994		10	0.64	8	0.01	18	0.13	16	0.49	30	0.14	12	0.26
Cohen 1997		61	0.41	32	0.00	38	0.05	46	0.05	24	0.30	29	0.12
Coop 1987		48	0.49	28	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.19	51	0.05	31	0.10
Cortot 1951		46	0.49	9	0.01	60	0.05	44	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.05
Czerny 1949		25	0.56	12	0.01	31	0.09	31	0.17	46	0.06	32	0.10
Czerny 1949b		28	0.55	11	0.01	36	0.09	33	0.09	63	0.04	39	0.06
Ezaki 2006		52	0.48	25	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	61	0.04	54	0.04
Falvay 1989		59	0.42	53	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.05	56	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		51	0.48	35	0.00	41	0.05	53	0.05	55	0.05	49	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		47	0.49	56	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	42	0.07	41	0.06
Fliere 1977		26	0.56	40	0.00	28	0.13	26	0.29	60	0.05	28	0.12
Fou 1978		40	0.51	33	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.06	47	0.05
Francois 1956		36	0.53	34	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.05	56	0.04	65	0.04
Hatto 1997		15	0.61	45	0.00	12	0.19	13	0.52	25	0.18	11	0.31
Horowitz 1971		7	0.65	14	0.01	10	0.17	8	0.57	21	0.38	6	0.47
Horowitz 1985		13	0.62	54	0.00	17	0.17	19	0.42	7	0.54	4	0.48
Indjic 2001		17	0.61	38	0.00	11	0.10	15	0.52	25	0.21	10	0.33
Kapell 1951		50	0.49	60	0.00	48	0.06	41	0.06	58	0.05	48	0.05
Kiepura 1999		37	0.53	18	0.00	44	0.06	38	0.06	38	0.07	38	0.06
Kilenyi 1937		56	0.46	63	0.00	50	0.05	45	0.05	56	0.05	50	0.05
Kissin 1993		32	0.54	51	0.00	25	0.10	21	0.38	58	0.05	24	0.14
Kitain 1937		63	0.40	27	0.00	39	0.05	52	0.05	23	0.32	26	0.13
Kushner 1990		9	0.64	21	0.00	9	0.14	11	0.55	61	0.04	22	0.15
Levy 1951		38	0.52	31	0.00	27	0.11	28	0.22	27	0.23	15	0.22
Luisada 1990		43	0.51	57	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04
Lushtak 2004		11	0.63	5	0.04	8	0.14	3	0.73	26	0.30	5	0.47
Lympany 1968		16	0.61	19	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.36	41	0.08	19	0.17
Magaloff 1977		42	0.51	50	0.00	58	0.05	50	0.05	63	0.04	59	0.04
Magaloff 1977b		44	0.50	64	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.04	64	0.04
Magin 1975		54	0.47	55	0.00	54	0.03	64	0.03	50	0.06	57	0.04
Milkina 1970		1	0.70	1	0.33	1	0.33	2	0.75	16	0.54	1	0.64
Mohovich 1999		3	0.68	4	0.06	5	0.20	5	0.70	20	0.42	3	0.54
Nadelmann 1956		2	0.69	3	0.14	3	0.21	7	0.65	14	0.33	7	0.46
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.48	23	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.20	58	0.04	33	0.09
Olejniczac 1990		49	0.49	58	0.00	53	0.06	39	0.06	43	0.07	40	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		41	0.51	61	0.00	40	0.05	48	0.05	60	0.05	45	0.05
Osinska 1989		8	0.64	48	0.00	14	0.13	12	0.55	60	0.04	20	0.15
Paderewski 1912		31	0.55	37	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.06	60	0.04	51	0.05
Perahia 1994		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perlemuter 1986		21	0.59	15	0.01	20	0.09	17	0.47	61	0.04	23	0.14
Poblocka 1999		35	0.53	26	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	54	0.05	37	0.07
Rangell 2001		39	0.51	20	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.08	51	0.05	42	0.06
Risler 1920		60	0.42	66	0.00	63	0.06	40	0.06	60	0.05	44	0.05
Rosen 1989		57	0.44	39	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	61	0.04	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		6	0.66	7	0.02	4	0.25	6	0.69	8	0.58	2	0.63
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.59	41	0.00	16	0.13	18	0.45	60	0.04	27	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.63	10	0.01	6	0.19	9	0.57	27	0.30	8	0.41
Rummel 1943		30	0.55	49	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.07	58	0.04	52	0.05
Shebanova 2002		22	0.59	6	0.04	13	0.14	10	0.55	44	0.06	17	0.18
Smith 1975		5	0.66	13	0.01	7	0.32	4	0.70	26	0.19	9	0.36
Szpilman 1948		33	0.54	43	0.00	42	0.04	56	0.04	49	0.06	43	0.05
Uninsky 1971		23	0.57	16	0.01	23	0.09	23	0.36	30	0.15	14	0.23
Wasowski 1980		14	0.61	17	0.00	19	0.11	20	0.41	29	0.15	13	0.25
Weissenberg 1971		55	0.47	52	0.00	49	0.06	42	0.06	59	0.04	46	0.05
Average		4	0.67	2	0.22	2	0.23	1	0.82	58	0.05	16	0.20
Random 1		66	-0.06	59	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	62	0.02	66	0.01
Random 2		64	0.02	62	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	51	0.05	60	0.04
Random 3		65	-0.02	44	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	15	0.33	35	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).