Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.63	63	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	34	0.09	53	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		21	0.74	36	0.00	16	0.11	17	0.45	11	0.49	18	0.47
Beliavsky 2004		49	0.64	28	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	33	0.10	48	0.08
BenOr 1989		12	0.79	17	0.00	14	0.24	10	0.66	11	0.58	10	0.62
Biret 1990		47	0.65	6	0.02	37	0.08	39	0.08	10	0.48	35	0.20
Blet 2003		27	0.72	21	0.00	34	0.10	35	0.10	9	0.52	32	0.23
Block 1995		24	0.74	29	0.00	33	0.11	34	0.11	17	0.48	33	0.23
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.59	56	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	24	0.35	43	0.13
Chiu 1999		14	0.78	16	0.00	15	0.13	16	0.46	20	0.44	20	0.45
Clidat 1994		30	0.71	23	0.00	35	0.12	33	0.12	20	0.26	37	0.18
Cohen 1997		62	0.44	33	0.00	63	0.06	50	0.06	39	0.06	57	0.06
Coop 1987		1	0.87	2	0.32	2	0.60	2	0.75	6	0.67	1	0.71
Cortot 1951		57	0.56	42	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	30	0.23	46	0.10
Czerny 1949		32	0.70	52	0.00	18	0.11	21	0.42	15	0.42	23	0.42
Czerny 1949b		28	0.72	39	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.37	19	0.40	24	0.38
Ezaki 2006		3	0.84	3	0.02	3	0.32	4	0.73	16	0.58	5	0.65
Falvay 1989		4	0.83	27	0.00	6	0.18	5	0.70	10	0.58	8	0.64
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.66	48	0.00	45	0.06	54	0.06	16	0.57	36	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		25	0.73	38	0.00	29	0.10	29	0.24	25	0.36	30	0.29
Fliere 1977		16	0.77	14	0.01	17	0.11	15	0.53	11	0.54	14	0.53
Fou 1978		11	0.80	26	0.00	10	0.16	8	0.68	10	0.62	7	0.65
Francois 1956		52	0.63	13	0.01	50	0.06	53	0.06	27	0.20	44	0.11
Hatto 1997		51	0.63	35	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	45	0.06	59	0.05
Horowitz 1971		55	0.60	41	0.00	54	0.06	46	0.06	41	0.06	58	0.06
Horowitz 1985		60	0.49	34	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	31	0.17	50	0.07
Indjic 2001		50	0.63	25	0.00	53	0.06	51	0.06	41	0.07	56	0.06
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kiepura 1999		44	0.66	22	0.00	49	0.09	36	0.09	33	0.08	47	0.08
Kilenyi 1937		8	0.81	4	0.02	4	0.18	9	0.67	5	0.69	2	0.68
Kissin 1993		7	0.81	47	0.00	13	0.18	12	0.60	19	0.42	16	0.50
Kitain 1937		63	0.35	31	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.06	61	0.05
Kushner 1990		18	0.76	11	0.01	12	0.14	14	0.54	10	0.58	13	0.56
Levy 1951		40	0.68	32	0.00	36	0.09	37	0.09	6	0.63	31	0.24
Luisada 1990		36	0.69	49	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.07	30	0.14	45	0.10
Lushtak 2004		20	0.74	37	0.00	32	0.12	30	0.24	17	0.41	29	0.31
Lympany 1968		34	0.69	44	0.00	40	0.06	47	0.06	18	0.39	39	0.15
Magaloff 1977		33	0.70	53	0.00	42	0.08	38	0.08	28	0.24	41	0.14
Magaloff 1977b		35	0.69	58	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.07	24	0.29	42	0.14
Magin 1975		5	0.83	12	0.01	5	0.16	7	0.69	8	0.61	6	0.65
Milkina 1970		39	0.68	18	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	43	0.06	54	0.06
Mohovich 1999		31	0.71	20	0.00	21	0.13	24	0.37	14	0.52	22	0.44
Nadelmann 1956		37	0.69	10	0.01	20	0.11	27	0.28	8	0.41	26	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.78	43	0.00	23	0.10	18	0.45	11	0.54	17	0.49
Olejniczac 1990		22	0.74	54	0.00	28	0.11	28	0.28	22	0.40	27	0.33
Olejniczak 1991		17	0.76	61	0.00	25	0.10	20	0.42	16	0.47	21	0.44
Osinska 1989		10	0.81	9	0.01	8	0.21	3	0.74	16	0.50	11	0.61
Paderewski 1912		48	0.64	59	0.00	47	0.06	43	0.06	40	0.06	55	0.06
Perahia 1994		61	0.49	60	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	41	0.06	60	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		38	0.69	5	0.02	31	0.11	31	0.23	29	0.20	34	0.21
Poblocka 1999		13	0.79	7	0.02	9	0.19	13	0.59	16	0.57	12	0.58
Rangell 2001		9	0.81	40	0.00	11	0.15	11	0.63	4	0.65	9	0.64
Risler 1920		23	0.74	50	0.00	26	0.13	22	0.38	11	0.54	19	0.45
Rosen 1989		41	0.68	46	0.00	44	0.06	48	0.06	18	0.44	38	0.16
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.51	55	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.05	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.71	45	0.00	22	0.11	26	0.31	19	0.43	25	0.37
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.66	15	0.00	38	0.07	42	0.07	33	0.07	52	0.07
Rummel 1943		58	0.56	51	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	29	0.13	49	0.08
Shebanova 2002		19	0.75	66	0.00	27	0.12	25	0.34	21	0.30	28	0.32
Smith 1975		42	0.68	57	0.00	30	0.09	32	0.20	31	0.11	40	0.15
Szpilman 1948		26	0.72	30	0.00	19	0.13	19	0.42	9	0.63	15	0.51
Uninsky 1971		43	0.67	24	0.00	39	0.06	44	0.06	38	0.08	51	0.07
Wasowski 1980		54	0.62	19	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	52	0.05	62	0.04
Weissenberg 1971		6	0.82	8	0.01	7	0.24	6	0.69	3	0.64	3	0.66
Average		2	0.87	1	0.44	1	0.43	1	0.87	13	0.50	4	0.66
Random 1		65	-0.02	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	34	0.05	65	0.03
Random 2		64	0.00	62	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	48	0.05	64	0.04
Random 3		66	-0.06	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	49	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).