Czerny 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.62	31	0.00	43	0.07	39	0.07	24	0.33	42	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		34	0.68	40	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.08	27	0.17	47	0.12
Beliavsky 2004		27	0.69	52	0.00	49	0.07	35	0.07	16	0.38	37	0.16
BenOr 1989		22	0.71	57	0.00	22	0.11	17	0.42	26	0.24	27	0.32
Biret 1990		59	0.56	63	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	48	0.05	66	0.04
Blet 2003		55	0.59	53	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.06	23	0.23	46	0.12
Block 1995		49	0.63	48	0.00	38	0.06	40	0.06	28	0.30	44	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		44	0.64	6	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	11	0.56	40	0.15
Chiu 1999		38	0.67	28	0.00	12	0.14	21	0.39	24	0.39	23	0.39
Clidat 1994		19	0.72	46	0.00	16	0.09	16	0.42	7	0.50	16	0.46
Cohen 1997		63	0.32	66	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	50	0.05	62	0.05
Coop 1987		28	0.69	43	0.00	11	0.13	13	0.45	31	0.17	29	0.28
Cortot 1951		54	0.60	12	0.00	60	0.06	50	0.06	6	0.66	31	0.20
Czerny 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1949b		1	0.94	1	0.95	1	0.94	1	0.97	1	0.98	1	0.97
Ezaki 2006		5	0.77	34	0.00	5	0.32	5	0.73	11	0.64	4	0.68
Falvay 1989		30	0.69	49	0.00	10	0.13	14	0.43	25	0.37	22	0.40
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.51	20	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	28	0.29	50	0.11
Fiorentino 1962		18	0.72	55	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.38	13	0.53	17	0.45
Fliere 1977		10	0.74	16	0.00	13	0.12	10	0.53	22	0.47	11	0.50
Fou 1978		7	0.75	36	0.00	9	0.20	8	0.64	14	0.61	6	0.62
Francois 1956		41	0.66	58	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	30	0.16	55	0.09
Hatto 1997		57	0.57	21	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	38	0.07	59	0.05
Horowitz 1971		46	0.63	50	0.00	46	0.06	44	0.06	16	0.42	38	0.16
Horowitz 1985		56	0.57	4	0.01	57	0.04	62	0.04	10	0.53	39	0.15
Indjic 2001		60	0.56	29	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	55	0.06	60	0.05
Kapell 1951		24	0.70	25	0.00	19	0.10	15	0.42	21	0.42	19	0.42
Kiepura 1999		13	0.73	10	0.00	17	0.10	26	0.31	4	0.62	18	0.44
Kilenyi 1937		12	0.73	11	0.00	8	0.24	9	0.56	19	0.50	10	0.53
Kissin 1993		9	0.74	2	0.01	3	0.31	7	0.67	12	0.52	7	0.59
Kitain 1937		62	0.48	24	0.00	62	0.05	53	0.05	24	0.25	51	0.11
Kushner 1990		37	0.67	61	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.18	39	0.07	49	0.11
Levy 1951		48	0.63	17	0.00	36	0.06	47	0.06	9	0.59	32	0.19
Luisada 1990		8	0.74	22	0.00	21	0.14	11	0.51	4	0.61	9	0.56
Lushtak 2004		31	0.69	38	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.08	28	0.25	43	0.14
Lympany 1968		40	0.66	15	0.00	48	0.07	36	0.07	49	0.06	56	0.06
Magaloff 1977		35	0.67	59	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.07	23	0.31	41	0.15
Magaloff 1977b		39	0.66	56	0.00	42	0.05	52	0.05	31	0.21	53	0.10
Magin 1975		6	0.77	5	0.00	4	0.23	6	0.73	3	0.67	3	0.70
Milkina 1970		43	0.64	60	0.00	50	0.06	45	0.06	45	0.06	57	0.06
Mohovich 1999		45	0.64	35	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	41	0.07	58	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		32	0.69	23	0.00	29	0.12	28	0.27	7	0.41	25	0.33
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.61	51	0.00	34	0.07	38	0.07	29	0.18	48	0.11
Olejniczac 1990		15	0.73	37	0.00	23	0.13	19	0.40	12	0.55	14	0.47
Olejniczak 1991		23	0.71	64	0.00	27	0.09	25	0.31	21	0.34	26	0.32
Osinska 1989		4	0.77	3	0.01	6	0.29	4	0.74	15	0.53	5	0.63
Paderewski 1912		11	0.73	13	0.00	15	0.10	20	0.40	2	0.62	12	0.50
Perahia 1994		58	0.56	41	0.00	61	0.06	46	0.06	31	0.17	52	0.10
Perlemuter 1986		17	0.73	26	0.00	28	0.09	30	0.18	28	0.20	33	0.19
Poblocka 1999		3	0.78	8	0.00	7	0.32	3	0.76	3	0.71	2	0.73
Rangell 2001		29	0.69	32	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.25	23	0.41	28	0.32
Risler 1920		25	0.70	54	0.00	25	0.09	23	0.37	8	0.56	15	0.46
Rosen 1989		42	0.65	7	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.06	16	0.47	36	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.61	9	0.00	40	0.06	48	0.06	26	0.23	45	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.67	39	0.00	37	0.05	54	0.05	31	0.19	54	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.61	47	0.00	51	0.04	60	0.04	50	0.05	64	0.04
Rummel 1943		26	0.70	18	0.00	45	0.06	49	0.06	3	0.60	34	0.19
Shebanova 2002		21	0.71	27	0.00	20	0.12	12	0.46	19	0.36	21	0.41
Smith 1975		16	0.73	42	0.00	26	0.09	27	0.28	12	0.43	24	0.35
Szpilman 1948		20	0.71	45	0.00	14	0.10	18	0.40	15	0.58	13	0.48
Uninsky 1971		14	0.73	30	0.00	18	0.11	24	0.36	10	0.48	20	0.42
Wasowski 1980		33	0.68	14	0.00	47	0.06	41	0.06	12	0.48	35	0.17
Weissenberg 1971		47	0.63	33	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	28	0.26	30	0.21
Average		2	0.83	19	0.00	2	0.60	2	0.84	20	0.42	8	0.59
Random 1		66	-0.04	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	32	0.10	63	0.04
Random 2		64	-0.01	62	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	45	0.05	65	0.04
Random 3		65	-0.03	44	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	24	0.22	61	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).