Weissenberg 1971

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   43  0.3214  0.0044  0.0935  0.0932  0.0937  0.09
Ashkenazy 1981   52  0.2616  0.0050  0.0550  0.0550  0.0654  0.05
Beliavsky 2004   46  0.3033  0.0046  0.1133  0.1126  0.1926  0.14
BenOr 1989   4  0.474  0.034  0.233  0.6927  0.462  0.56
Biret 1990   23  0.4126  0.0022  0.0821  0.3331  0.1119  0.19
Blet 2003   32  0.3856  0.0025  0.0724  0.2635  0.0733  0.13
Block 1995   20  0.4118  0.0031  0.0829  0.1530  0.1328  0.14
Brailowsky 1960   26  0.4148  0.0021  0.0719  0.3541  0.0920  0.18
Chiu 1999   41  0.337  0.0320  0.0831  0.1329  0.1430  0.13
Clidat 1994   17  0.4235  0.007  0.1711  0.4313  0.4011  0.41
Cohen 1997   63  0.1457  0.0063  0.0552  0.0563  0.0264  0.03
Coop 1987   2  0.571  0.611  0.611  0.802  0.701  0.75
Cortot 1951   61  0.1915  0.0062  0.0557  0.0542  0.0746  0.06
Czerny 1949   60  0.2047  0.0060  0.0745  0.0760  0.0451  0.05
Czerny 1949b   59  0.2162  0.0058  0.0459  0.0461  0.0458  0.04
Ezaki 2006   35  0.3517  0.0036  0.0740  0.0742  0.0938  0.08
Falvay 1989   5  0.453  0.035  0.205  0.5218  0.484  0.50
Ferenczy 1958   8  0.448  0.0213  0.1313  0.4325  0.3712  0.40
Fiorentino 1962   34  0.3659  0.0026  0.0826  0.2236  0.1025  0.15
Fliere 1977   25  0.4110  0.0129  0.0728  0.1820  0.4115  0.27
Fou 1978   53  0.2549  0.0057  0.0555  0.0556  0.0549  0.05
Francois 1956   49  0.2939  0.0052  0.0462  0.0449  0.0562  0.04
Hatto 1997   9  0.4445  0.0011  0.1312  0.4320  0.449  0.43
Horowitz 1971   14  0.4336  0.009  0.139  0.4416  0.457  0.44
Horowitz 1985   33  0.3712  0.0139  0.0743  0.0748  0.0740  0.07
Indjic 2001   15  0.4324  0.0012  0.1414  0.4321  0.4410  0.43
Kapell 1951   29  0.3830  0.0035  0.0838  0.0830  0.2032  0.13
Kiepura 1999   28  0.3951  0.0033  0.0647  0.0642  0.0547  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   44  0.3242  0.0041  0.0744  0.0749  0.0743  0.07
Kissin 1993   56  0.2450  0.0059  0.0551  0.0558  0.0459  0.04
Kitain 1937   47  0.3020  0.0042  0.0837  0.0815  0.4518  0.19
Kushner 1990   30  0.3829  0.0045  0.1034  0.1050  0.0542  0.07
Levy 1951   10  0.446  0.0330  0.0630  0.1533  0.1231  0.13
Luisada 1990   62  0.1938  0.0061  0.0549  0.0552  0.0552  0.05
Lushtak 2004   21  0.4132  0.0028  0.0827  0.2033  0.1027  0.14
Lympany 1968   11  0.4343  0.0023  0.0920  0.3319  0.4613  0.39
Magaloff 1977   58  0.2366  0.0054  0.0458  0.0443  0.0560  0.04
Magaloff 1977b   57  0.2355  0.0049  0.0556  0.0533  0.0745  0.06
Magin 1975   39  0.3423  0.0038  0.0742  0.0740  0.0841  0.07
Milkina 1970   24  0.4144  0.0019  0.1018  0.3634  0.0921  0.18
Mohovich 1999   6  0.459  0.018  0.174  0.5313  0.553  0.54
Nadelmann 1956   18  0.4225  0.0010  0.118  0.4437  0.0722  0.18
Ohlsson 1999   40  0.3422  0.0037  0.0739  0.0752  0.0544  0.06
Olejniczac 1990   36  0.3554  0.0032  0.0632  0.1235  0.1035  0.11
Olejniczak 1991   27  0.3919  0.0024  0.0822  0.2821  0.2716  0.27
Osinska 1989   16  0.435  0.0314  0.0923  0.2745  0.0629  0.13
Paderewski 1912   55  0.2464  0.0055  0.0460  0.0460  0.0363  0.03
Perahia 1994   3  0.4846  0.003  0.256  0.4916  0.416  0.45
Perlemuter 1986   13  0.4321  0.0017  0.1215  0.4143  0.0623  0.16
Poblocka 1999   19  0.4111  0.0116  0.0916  0.3725  0.2414  0.30
Rangell 2001   51  0.2627  0.0051  0.0461  0.0440  0.0655  0.05
Risler 1920   48  0.3028  0.0048  0.0553  0.0544  0.0548  0.05
Rosen 1989   54  0.2565  0.0056  0.0463  0.0447  0.0753  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   50  0.2753  0.0053  0.0548  0.0551  0.0457  0.04
Rubinstein 1952   31  0.3860  0.0027  0.0925  0.2647  0.0436  0.10
Rubinstein 1966   22  0.4140  0.0018  0.1017  0.3743  0.0624  0.15
Rummel 1943   38  0.3431  0.0034  0.0741  0.0725  0.2034  0.12
Shebanova 2002   37  0.3541  0.0040  0.0646  0.0651  0.0550  0.05
Smith 1975   12  0.4334  0.006  0.1910  0.445  0.428  0.43
Szpilman 1948   42  0.3313  0.0143  0.0936  0.0946  0.0739  0.08
Uninsky 1971   7  0.4437  0.0015  0.107  0.4618  0.465  0.46
Wasowski 1980   45  0.3058  0.0047  0.0554  0.0553  0.0456  0.04
Weissenberg 1971   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Average   1  0.582  0.112  0.622  0.7956  0.0517  0.20
Random 1    65  -0.0363  0.0065  0.0265  0.0264  0.0265  0.02
Random 2   64  -0.0252  0.0064  0.0364  0.0339  0.0561  0.04
Random 3   66  -0.1161  0.0066  0.0166  0.0166  0.0166  0.01

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).