Rummel 1943

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		56	0.24	35	0.00	53	0.04	52	0.04	42	0.05	60	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.33	54	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.07	49	0.06	41	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		63	0.17	66	0.00	59	0.03	64	0.03	48	0.07	51	0.05
BenOr 1989		52	0.27	44	0.00	58	0.03	59	0.03	60	0.05	62	0.04
Biret 1990		27	0.35	50	0.00	32	0.09	28	0.17	35	0.07	29	0.11
Blet 2003		24	0.37	9	0.01	8	0.15	11	0.34	30	0.18	15	0.25
Block 1995		45	0.31	20	0.01	33	0.08	33	0.08	51	0.05	40	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		7	0.46	15	0.01	11	0.17	8	0.49	33	0.13	13	0.25
Chiu 1999		42	0.32	42	0.00	47	0.05	44	0.05	50	0.05	47	0.05
Clidat 1994		13	0.41	21	0.01	7	0.13	10	0.44	24	0.28	5	0.35
Cohen 1997		60	0.22	55	0.00	57	0.04	55	0.04	31	0.15	35	0.08
Coop 1987		17	0.39	43	0.00	30	0.09	23	0.23	49	0.05	27	0.11
Cortot 1951		48	0.30	13	0.01	21	0.09	29	0.16	19	0.45	12	0.27
Czerny 1949		12	0.43	25	0.00	17	0.13	18	0.28	30	0.21	17	0.24
Czerny 1949b		25	0.36	31	0.00	38	0.04	51	0.04	45	0.06	49	0.05
Ezaki 2006		57	0.24	62	0.00	61	0.04	54	0.04	55	0.06	44	0.05
Falvay 1989		51	0.28	27	0.00	54	0.05	49	0.05	46	0.05	48	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.23	64	0.00	43	0.06	38	0.06	52	0.06	38	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		22	0.37	32	0.00	39	0.05	46	0.05	42	0.08	42	0.06
Fliere 1977		41	0.33	28	0.00	45	0.04	50	0.04	43	0.05	56	0.04
Fou 1978		43	0.32	49	0.00	50	0.05	47	0.05	50	0.06	50	0.05
Francois 1956		15	0.40	48	0.00	24	0.06	30	0.14	18	0.38	18	0.23
Hatto 1997		33	0.34	45	0.00	23	0.09	20	0.26	40	0.07	24	0.13
Horowitz 1971		5	0.47	24	0.00	4	0.16	3	0.54	13	0.50	2	0.52
Horowitz 1985		46	0.31	60	0.00	15	0.12	27	0.19	31	0.16	21	0.17
Indjic 2001		36	0.34	46	0.00	22	0.07	19	0.27	30	0.24	16	0.25
Kapell 1951		54	0.26	40	0.00	56	0.03	63	0.03	58	0.04	63	0.03
Kiepura 1999		11	0.43	19	0.01	13	0.09	15	0.30	23	0.25	9	0.27
Kilenyi 1937		18	0.38	33	0.00	27	0.06	31	0.13	44	0.07	32	0.10
Kissin 1993		29	0.34	4	0.06	20	0.07	32	0.13	31	0.16	22	0.14
Kitain 1937		55	0.26	29	0.00	52	0.03	60	0.03	36	0.08	54	0.05
Kushner 1990		53	0.27	41	0.00	51	0.03	61	0.03	48	0.05	58	0.04
Levy 1951		31	0.34	23	0.00	41	0.06	37	0.06	41	0.06	37	0.06
Luisada 1990		2	0.50	3	0.08	3	0.19	6	0.51	10	0.58	1	0.54
Lushtak 2004		49	0.29	58	0.00	49	0.05	43	0.05	60	0.04	61	0.04
Lympany 1968		44	0.32	61	0.00	46	0.05	45	0.05	54	0.05	45	0.05
Magaloff 1977		21	0.37	47	0.00	25	0.06	21	0.26	16	0.38	7	0.31
Magaloff 1977b		35	0.34	26	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.06	26	0.20	28	0.11
Magin 1975		4	0.48	6	0.05	10	0.12	4	0.53	39	0.09	19	0.22
Milkina 1970		47	0.30	52	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.20	55	0.05	31	0.10
Mohovich 1999		61	0.19	59	0.00	62	0.03	58	0.03	60	0.04	65	0.03
Nadelmann 1956		6	0.47	7	0.02	5	0.15	5	0.53	30	0.14	11	0.27
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.37	12	0.01	26	0.07	16	0.29	44	0.05	26	0.12
Olejniczac 1990		20	0.38	37	0.00	37	0.06	42	0.06	43	0.07	39	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		19	0.38	22	0.00	40	0.07	34	0.07	49	0.07	36	0.07
Osinska 1989		30	0.34	63	0.00	48	0.06	36	0.06	60	0.04	46	0.05
Paderewski 1912		10	0.43	8	0.02	9	0.12	2	0.55	6	0.46	3	0.50
Perahia 1994		34	0.34	56	0.00	34	0.06	39	0.06	50	0.05	52	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		8	0.44	17	0.01	16	0.09	17	0.29	41	0.06	23	0.13
Poblocka 1999		9	0.43	11	0.01	14	0.10	14	0.30	26	0.24	10	0.27
Rangell 2001		40	0.33	57	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.06	36	0.07	43	0.06
Risler 1920		37	0.33	5	0.05	18	0.10	22	0.24	21	0.27	14	0.25
Rosen 1989		62	0.18	65	0.00	63	0.04	53	0.04	53	0.06	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		14	0.41	14	0.01	6	0.13	9	0.47	24	0.23	6	0.33
Rubinstein 1952		26	0.36	18	0.01	12	0.12	13	0.33	52	0.04	30	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.33	30	0.00	28	0.06	24	0.22	60	0.04	34	0.09
Rummel 1943		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		58	0.23	53	0.00	60	0.04	56	0.04	63	0.04	59	0.04
Smith 1975		3	0.50	2	0.10	2	0.17	7	0.50	8	0.35	4	0.42
Szpilman 1948		50	0.28	39	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	51	0.05	57	0.04
Uninsky 1971		16	0.39	10	0.01	19	0.11	12	0.34	28	0.25	8	0.29
Wasowski 1980		28	0.35	36	0.00	44	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.04	55	0.04
Weissenberg 1971		32	0.34	16	0.01	31	0.08	25	0.20	41	0.07	25	0.12
Average		1	0.57	1	0.46	1	0.45	1	0.80	48	0.06	20	0.22
Random 1		66	-0.07	34	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	41	0.04	66	0.02
Random 2		65	-0.04	51	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	51	0.04	64	0.03
Random 3		64	0.04	38	0.00	64	0.03	62	0.03	8	0.36	33	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).