Perlemuter 1986

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		34	0.42	19	0.00	31	0.12	25	0.22	4	0.66	23	0.38
Ashkenazy 1981		30	0.43	27	0.00	14	0.09	16	0.37	13	0.55	18	0.45
Beliavsky 2004		56	0.33	58	0.00	41	0.07	36	0.07	17	0.40	32	0.17
BenOr 1989		12	0.49	16	0.00	11	0.15	11	0.54	26	0.49	12	0.51
Biret 1990		37	0.41	28	0.00	38	0.08	33	0.08	36	0.07	49	0.07
Blet 2003		44	0.39	22	0.00	35	0.05	48	0.05	41	0.06	60	0.05
Block 1995		51	0.35	42	0.00	48	0.05	56	0.05	57	0.04	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		19	0.45	30	0.00	40	0.07	35	0.07	38	0.10	44	0.08
Chiu 1999		54	0.33	13	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	48	0.05	63	0.04
Clidat 1994		38	0.41	52	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.20	14	0.40	26	0.28
Cohen 1997		46	0.38	31	0.00	29	0.07	24	0.23	3	0.68	22	0.40
Coop 1987		3	0.56	11	0.00	5	0.24	3	0.77	3	0.69	2	0.73
Cortot 1951		63	0.26	55	0.00	63	0.05	51	0.05	33	0.11	50	0.07
Czerny 1949		53	0.33	38	0.00	60	0.05	47	0.05	55	0.05	61	0.05
Czerny 1949b		62	0.27	66	0.00	62	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.05	59	0.05
Ezaki 2006		48	0.37	64	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	37	0.10	51	0.06
Falvay 1989		9	0.51	15	0.00	12	0.12	9	0.55	7	0.63	9	0.59
Ferenczy 1958		52	0.34	29	0.00	42	0.06	38	0.06	45	0.07	55	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		40	0.41	63	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.06	31	0.17	42	0.10
Fliere 1977		28	0.43	21	0.00	20	0.07	23	0.28	4	0.58	21	0.40
Fou 1978		49	0.36	46	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	37	0.09	46	0.07
Francois 1956		11	0.50	8	0.01	13	0.13	18	0.37	3	0.70	13	0.51
Hatto 1997		10	0.50	24	0.00	10	0.13	10	0.55	6	0.65	8	0.60
Horowitz 1971		47	0.37	43	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	52	0.05	62	0.05
Horowitz 1985		58	0.31	50	0.00	59	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.07	57	0.05
Indjic 2001		8	0.51	18	0.00	9	0.15	8	0.56	4	0.67	7	0.61
Kapell 1951		31	0.43	5	0.02	18	0.10	26	0.22	21	0.41	25	0.30
Kiepura 1999		26	0.44	54	0.00	25	0.07	32	0.12	32	0.12	38	0.12
Kilenyi 1937		39	0.41	48	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.06	29	0.21	40	0.11
Kissin 1993		42	0.40	44	0.00	50	0.05	53	0.05	46	0.07	53	0.06
Kitain 1937		61	0.30	61	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	23	0.35	37	0.13
Kushner 1990		6	0.52	7	0.01	6	0.23	7	0.62	7	0.69	6	0.65
Levy 1951		45	0.38	10	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.06	25	0.28	35	0.13
Luisada 1990		50	0.36	60	0.00	61	0.05	46	0.05	34	0.09	48	0.07
Lushtak 2004		18	0.46	32	0.00	17	0.13	12	0.49	14	0.51	15	0.50
Lympany 1968		21	0.45	45	0.00	22	0.06	15	0.39	5	0.63	14	0.50
Magaloff 1977		57	0.32	56	0.00	55	0.05	45	0.05	31	0.20	41	0.10
Magaloff 1977b		59	0.31	34	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	27	0.20	43	0.09
Magin 1975		36	0.42	51	0.00	46	0.07	37	0.07	42	0.07	45	0.07
Milkina 1970		5	0.55	2	0.08	2	0.35	4	0.73	6	0.70	3	0.71
Mohovich 1999		16	0.47	4	0.03	8	0.18	13	0.48	6	0.64	11	0.55
Nadelmann 1956		4	0.55	6	0.01	4	0.25	5	0.73	3	0.65	4	0.69
Ohlsson 1999		25	0.44	53	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.28	13	0.40	24	0.33
Olejniczac 1990		22	0.45	14	0.00	28	0.07	30	0.17	21	0.42	29	0.27
Olejniczak 1991		13	0.48	17	0.00	19	0.08	19	0.36	13	0.59	17	0.46
Osinska 1989		2	0.60	3	0.07	3	0.36	2	0.79	3	0.73	1	0.76
Paderewski 1912		32	0.43	39	0.00	34	0.05	49	0.05	13	0.38	34	0.14
Perahia 1994		41	0.40	9	0.01	23	0.07	28	0.21	29	0.19	30	0.20
Perlemuter 1986		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Poblocka 1999		23	0.45	47	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.13	23	0.26	31	0.18
Rangell 2001		20	0.45	20	0.00	26	0.07	20	0.31	7	0.66	19	0.45
Risler 1920		55	0.33	25	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	37	0.07	58	0.05
Rosen 1989		60	0.31	41	0.00	56	0.03	63	0.03	35	0.14	56	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		14	0.47	23	0.00	15	0.09	14	0.44	13	0.44	20	0.44
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.43	33	0.00	16	0.11	21	0.31	30	0.25	27	0.28
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.52	12	0.00	7	0.26	6	0.64	13	0.51	10	0.57
Rummel 1943		24	0.44	26	0.00	45	0.06	41	0.06	17	0.29	36	0.13
Shebanova 2002		33	0.43	36	0.00	37	0.06	40	0.06	36	0.08	47	0.07
Smith 1975		15	0.47	49	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.21	7	0.35	28	0.27
Szpilman 1948		17	0.46	40	0.00	21	0.09	17	0.37	8	0.65	16	0.49
Uninsky 1971		43	0.39	57	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	35	0.07	54	0.06
Wasowski 1980		35	0.42	37	0.00	33	0.07	34	0.07	29	0.19	39	0.12
Weissenberg 1971		27	0.43	35	0.00	36	0.06	43	0.06	15	0.41	33	0.16
Average		1	0.69	1	0.71	1	0.70	1	0.91	10	0.52	5	0.69
Random 1		66	-0.03	59	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	29	0.17	52	0.06
Random 2		65	-0.03	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	40	0.05	65	0.03
Random 3		64	0.00	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	52	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).