Paderewski 1912

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		43	0.31	30	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.09	22	0.26	28	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.37	28	0.00	29	0.06	27	0.24	28	0.15	23	0.19
Beliavsky 2004		37	0.32	25	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	18	0.36	21	0.21
BenOr 1989		46	0.30	61	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.06	54	0.05
Biret 1990		15	0.39	15	0.01	13	0.08	10	0.40	30	0.16	19	0.25
Blet 2003		55	0.26	51	0.00	52	0.03	64	0.03	62	0.04	64	0.03
Block 1995		51	0.29	22	0.01	42	0.07	40	0.07	60	0.03	53	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.32	56	0.00	46	0.04	48	0.04	51	0.07	50	0.05
Chiu 1999		20	0.38	8	0.02	10	0.14	9	0.41	11	0.49	3	0.45
Clidat 1994		32	0.34	6	0.03	28	0.07	29	0.21	37	0.07	32	0.12
Cohen 1997		62	0.23	36	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.06	24	0.29	31	0.13
Coop 1987		47	0.30	64	0.00	50	0.03	59	0.03	62	0.04	63	0.03
Cortot 1951		34	0.33	7	0.02	7	0.16	24	0.28	10	0.59	6	0.41
Czerny 1949		10	0.40	37	0.00	16	0.09	15	0.36	32	0.13	20	0.22
Czerny 1949b		21	0.38	20	0.01	15	0.06	18	0.33	25	0.26	15	0.29
Ezaki 2006		63	0.23	62	0.00	63	0.04	47	0.04	61	0.05	55	0.04
Falvay 1989		31	0.35	26	0.00	37	0.07	41	0.07	34	0.07	37	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.25	65	0.00	53	0.03	63	0.03	60	0.04	65	0.03
Fiorentino 1962		40	0.31	41	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	40	0.09	48	0.06
Fliere 1977		53	0.28	57	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.06	51	0.05	49	0.05
Fou 1978		35	0.32	29	0.00	48	0.04	55	0.04	48	0.06	51	0.05
Francois 1956		26	0.36	18	0.01	31	0.07	31	0.16	17	0.43	18	0.26
Hatto 1997		25	0.37	53	0.00	25	0.07	26	0.27	41	0.07	30	0.14
Horowitz 1971		29	0.35	13	0.01	19	0.06	28	0.23	43	0.05	35	0.11
Horowitz 1985		45	0.31	48	0.00	36	0.07	42	0.07	55	0.06	40	0.06
Indjic 2001		22	0.37	47	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.29	28	0.28	16	0.28
Kapell 1951		56	0.26	35	0.00	51	0.03	58	0.03	56	0.04	62	0.03
Kiepura 1999		11	0.39	24	0.00	14	0.10	12	0.38	35	0.07	26	0.16
Kilenyi 1937		48	0.30	19	0.01	45	0.04	50	0.04	37	0.09	43	0.06
Kissin 1993		3	0.45	10	0.02	4	0.20	3	0.55	15	0.59	1	0.57
Kitain 1937		41	0.31	31	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.08	20	0.40	24	0.18
Kushner 1990		42	0.31	33	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.07	49	0.05	42	0.06
Levy 1951		27	0.36	55	0.00	27	0.11	22	0.29	23	0.29	14	0.29
Luisada 1990		38	0.32	44	0.00	40	0.08	34	0.08	51	0.05	45	0.06
Lushtak 2004		33	0.34	38	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.18	47	0.06	36	0.10
Lympany 1968		14	0.39	52	0.00	20	0.08	25	0.27	26	0.31	13	0.29
Magaloff 1977		9	0.40	11	0.01	21	0.07	14	0.36	11	0.42	8	0.39
Magaloff 1977b		13	0.39	27	0.00	23	0.07	16	0.35	8	0.41	10	0.38
Magin 1975		54	0.27	40	0.00	59	0.04	49	0.04	63	0.03	60	0.03
Milkina 1970		4	0.44	14	0.01	2	0.27	4	0.49	22	0.34	5	0.41
Mohovich 1999		50	0.29	23	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.07	46	0.06	47	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		2	0.46	2	0.04	3	0.26	2	0.57	20	0.25	9	0.38
Ohlsson 1999		17	0.39	17	0.01	11	0.13	11	0.39	25	0.23	12	0.30
Olejniczac 1990		44	0.31	9	0.02	57	0.03	61	0.03	53	0.06	58	0.04
Olejniczak 1991		39	0.31	42	0.00	55	0.04	46	0.04	34	0.11	38	0.07
Osinska 1989		30	0.35	59	0.00	33	0.07	37	0.07	52	0.05	41	0.06
Paderewski 1912		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perahia 1994		18	0.38	39	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.32	34	0.09	25	0.17
Perlemuter 1986		7	0.43	32	0.00	12	0.12	13	0.38	49	0.05	29	0.14
Poblocka 1999		49	0.30	43	0.00	58	0.03	57	0.03	61	0.04	59	0.03
Rangell 2001		19	0.38	45	0.00	17	0.07	20	0.32	13	0.57	4	0.43
Risler 1920		60	0.24	58	0.00	61	0.04	52	0.04	59	0.04	57	0.04
Rosen 1989		61	0.24	49	0.00	62	0.05	45	0.05	45	0.08	46	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		16	0.39	21	0.01	8	0.15	7	0.44	18	0.28	11	0.35
Rubinstein 1952		12	0.39	4	0.03	22	0.08	17	0.34	50	0.04	33	0.12
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.41	12	0.01	9	0.15	8	0.44	39	0.06	27	0.16
Rummel 1943		5	0.43	5	0.03	5	0.15	6	0.46	2	0.55	2	0.50
Shebanova 2002		57	0.26	66	0.00	47	0.04	54	0.04	50	0.06	52	0.05
Smith 1975		6	0.43	3	0.03	6	0.17	5	0.49	11	0.33	7	0.40
Szpilman 1948		52	0.28	34	0.00	60	0.04	51	0.04	52	0.05	56	0.04
Uninsky 1971		23	0.37	50	0.00	26	0.08	21	0.30	27	0.25	17	0.27
Wasowski 1980		28	0.36	16	0.01	39	0.07	36	0.07	49	0.05	39	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		59	0.24	63	0.00	54	0.03	60	0.03	60	0.04	61	0.03
Average		1	0.56	1	0.60	1	0.59	1	0.75	52	0.05	22	0.19
Random 1		66	-0.06	60	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	60	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		65	0.00	46	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	30	0.18	44	0.06
Random 3		64	0.08	54	0.00	64	0.03	62	0.03	7	0.40	34	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).