Olejniczac 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.29	36	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	35	0.06	47	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.28	42	0.00	51	0.05	61	0.05	48	0.06	56	0.05
Beliavsky 2004		65	0.02	53	0.00	62	0.03	63	0.03	58	0.03	64	0.03
BenOr 1989		15	0.46	37	0.00	17	0.22	15	0.61	29	0.28	18	0.41
Biret 1990		27	0.40	7	0.00	29	0.13	26	0.32	33	0.09	30	0.17
Blet 2003		4	0.58	3	0.00	3	0.37	6	0.78	2	0.79	3	0.78
Block 1995		30	0.38	43	0.00	15	0.16	22	0.42	14	0.38	20	0.40
Brailowsky 1960		9	0.50	8	0.00	9	0.17	9	0.71	9	0.66	6	0.68
Chiu 1999		56	0.26	20	0.00	52	0.06	55	0.06	56	0.04	51	0.05
Clidat 1994		41	0.34	21	0.00	40	0.07	49	0.07	49	0.06	46	0.06
Cohen 1997		61	0.16	12	0.00	61	0.06	56	0.06	52	0.05	57	0.05
Coop 1987		10	0.49	10	0.00	10	0.16	10	0.70	19	0.44	13	0.55
Cortot 1951		62	0.09	44	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	61	0.02	66	0.02
Czerny 1949		26	0.41	28	0.00	19	0.15	18	0.50	23	0.29	23	0.38
Czerny 1949b		31	0.38	45	0.00	34	0.09	39	0.09	33	0.13	33	0.11
Ezaki 2006		20	0.42	9	0.00	22	0.14	19	0.50	24	0.47	15	0.48
Falvay 1989		17	0.45	54	0.00	14	0.15	16	0.59	12	0.56	12	0.57
Ferenczy 1958		12	0.48	38	0.00	6	0.29	11	0.68	6	0.69	7	0.68
Fiorentino 1962		1	0.96	1	0.99	1	0.97	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Fliere 1977		29	0.39	46	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.29	11	0.49	21	0.38
Fou 1978		22	0.41	29	0.00	25	0.12	25	0.37	25	0.44	19	0.40
Francois 1956		54	0.27	15	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	46	0.05	58	0.05
Hatto 1997		49	0.30	55	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	51	0.05	53	0.05
Horowitz 1971		36	0.36	6	0.00	26	0.09	31	0.17	50	0.05	38	0.09
Horowitz 1985		32	0.38	16	0.00	18	0.11	23	0.41	16	0.35	22	0.38
Indjic 2001		48	0.30	56	0.00	54	0.07	45	0.07	47	0.06	50	0.06
Kapell 1951		23	0.41	30	0.00	30	0.11	29	0.24	26	0.28	27	0.26
Kiepura 1999		19	0.42	57	0.00	24	0.12	24	0.40	31	0.14	28	0.24
Kilenyi 1937		8	0.51	22	0.00	8	0.16	7	0.75	4	0.73	4	0.74
Kissin 1993		58	0.25	47	0.00	58	0.07	48	0.07	50	0.05	45	0.06
Kitain 1937		60	0.19	58	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	64	0.03	62	0.04
Kushner 1990		25	0.41	59	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.13	43	0.07	36	0.10
Levy 1951		39	0.34	31	0.00	45	0.09	37	0.09	38	0.07	39	0.08
Luisada 1990		13	0.48	39	0.00	13	0.25	13	0.63	6	0.65	8	0.64
Lushtak 2004		53	0.27	48	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	56	0.04	60	0.04
Lympany 1968		45	0.32	60	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	36	0.08	40	0.07
Magaloff 1977		55	0.26	49	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	53	0.04	54	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		57	0.25	23	0.00	57	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.05	55	0.05
Magin 1975		5	0.57	32	0.00	5	0.40	8	0.73	8	0.66	5	0.69
Milkina 1970		40	0.34	61	0.00	42	0.12	34	0.12	63	0.03	44	0.06
Mohovich 1999		35	0.37	11	0.00	39	0.07	44	0.07	29	0.21	32	0.12
Nadelmann 1956		14	0.48	17	0.00	16	0.19	14	0.63	18	0.27	17	0.41
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.41	5	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.18	29	0.15	31	0.16
Olejniczac 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Olejniczak 1991		2	0.82	2	0.01	2	0.90	2	0.96	1	0.97	2	0.96
Osinska 1989		7	0.52	25	0.00	12	0.29	5	0.78	16	0.51	9	0.63
Paderewski 1912		47	0.31	62	0.00	48	0.06	53	0.06	61	0.03	59	0.04
Perahia 1994		51	0.28	33	0.00	55	0.09	40	0.09	60	0.04	49	0.06
Perlemuter 1986		16	0.45	26	0.00	20	0.14	21	0.42	30	0.17	26	0.27
Poblocka 1999		46	0.32	34	0.00	36	0.07	46	0.07	45	0.06	42	0.06
Rangell 2001		59	0.20	50	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	59	0.04	63	0.04
Risler 1920		42	0.33	51	0.00	28	0.10	28	0.27	11	0.47	24	0.36
Rosen 1989		18	0.43	40	0.00	21	0.16	17	0.52	17	0.59	14	0.55
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.33	52	0.00	44	0.09	38	0.09	57	0.03	52	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		11	0.49	4	0.00	7	0.15	12	0.66	11	0.57	10	0.61
Rubinstein 1966		6	0.52	63	0.00	11	0.22	4	0.78	15	0.45	11	0.59
Rummel 1943		34	0.38	18	0.00	37	0.07	43	0.07	42	0.06	48	0.06
Shebanova 2002		33	0.38	35	0.00	35	0.12	33	0.12	42	0.07	37	0.09
Smith 1975		37	0.35	19	0.00	38	0.08	42	0.08	47	0.05	43	0.06
Szpilman 1948		28	0.39	13	0.00	33	0.09	41	0.09	23	0.41	29	0.19
Uninsky 1971		44	0.32	64	0.00	43	0.09	36	0.09	43	0.06	41	0.07
Wasowski 1980		21	0.42	14	0.00	23	0.15	20	0.45	27	0.21	25	0.31
Weissenberg 1971		38	0.35	27	0.00	41	0.10	35	0.10	32	0.12	34	0.11
Average		3	0.64	24	0.00	4	0.50	3	0.90	25	0.25	16	0.47
Random 1		66	0.00	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	57	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		63	0.05	41	0.00	63	0.03	62	0.03	11	0.40	35	0.11
Random 3		64	0.04	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	34	0.08	61	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).