Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		22	0.48	15	0.00	20	0.10	20	0.40	2	0.76	17	0.55
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.55	2	0.03	9	0.20	9	0.61	2	0.78	8	0.69
Beliavsky 2004		28	0.45	11	0.01	25	0.08	27	0.28	3	0.70	22	0.44
BenOr 1989		14	0.52	12	0.00	15	0.15	14	0.54	16	0.58	16	0.56
Biret 1990		18	0.50	42	0.00	24	0.12	24	0.30	9	0.45	29	0.37
Blet 2003		45	0.38	40	0.00	49	0.06	43	0.06	36	0.07	56	0.06
Block 1995		36	0.41	49	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	48	0.06	63	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.32	64	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	47	0.08	55	0.06
Chiu 1999		26	0.46	52	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.25	3	0.57	25	0.38
Clidat 1994		24	0.48	44	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.30	9	0.48	27	0.38
Cohen 1997		42	0.39	14	0.00	28	0.08	32	0.16	5	0.67	30	0.33
Coop 1987		4	0.59	5	0.03	6	0.18	3	0.72	4	0.67	7	0.69
Cortot 1951		59	0.30	61	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	23	0.36	46	0.13
Czerny 1949		57	0.31	59	0.00	53	0.04	59	0.04	36	0.11	53	0.07
Czerny 1949b		58	0.31	50	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	44	0.06	60	0.05
Ezaki 2006		34	0.43	34	0.00	34	0.06	40	0.06	32	0.23	47	0.12
Falvay 1989		20	0.50	13	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.30	15	0.55	23	0.41
Ferenczy 1958		35	0.42	57	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	32	0.23	48	0.12
Fiorentino 1962		54	0.33	36	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.08	58	0.06
Fliere 1977		39	0.40	65	0.00	33	0.07	39	0.07	25	0.29	44	0.14
Fou 1978		47	0.37	53	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	36	0.09	52	0.07
Francois 1956		43	0.38	46	0.00	44	0.05	52	0.05	9	0.50	39	0.16
Hatto 1997		5	0.59	9	0.01	8	0.29	5	0.71	3	0.80	1	0.75
Horowitz 1971		49	0.36	16	0.00	43	0.09	35	0.09	22	0.33	38	0.17
Horowitz 1985		55	0.32	47	0.00	52	0.06	45	0.06	29	0.21	49	0.11
Indjic 2001		3	0.60	3	0.03	7	0.24	2	0.72	3	0.74	3	0.73
Kapell 1951		30	0.45	35	0.00	37	0.09	36	0.09	19	0.41	34	0.19
Kiepura 1999		38	0.40	21	0.00	21	0.09	28	0.27	17	0.38	31	0.32
Kilenyi 1937		44	0.38	63	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	28	0.22	50	0.10
Kissin 1993		13	0.54	22	0.00	16	0.12	17	0.46	6	0.67	15	0.56
Kitain 1937		52	0.33	32	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.06	12	0.48	37	0.17
Kushner 1990		15	0.52	25	0.00	12	0.15	10	0.57	6	0.69	10	0.63
Levy 1951		46	0.37	48	0.00	48	0.06	41	0.06	19	0.36	41	0.15
Luisada 1990		63	0.23	41	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	47	0.06	62	0.05
Lushtak 2004		8	0.55	26	0.00	10	0.19	13	0.56	7	0.65	12	0.60
Lympany 1968		25	0.46	51	0.00	32	0.11	30	0.21	4	0.64	28	0.37
Magaloff 1977		29	0.45	38	0.00	39	0.06	47	0.06	4	0.57	36	0.18
Magaloff 1977b		27	0.45	30	0.00	40	0.10	33	0.10	3	0.56	33	0.24
Magin 1975		53	0.33	39	0.00	59	0.05	51	0.05	48	0.05	59	0.05
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		23	0.48	7	0.02	17	0.10	16	0.48	2	0.72	13	0.59
Nadelmann 1956		31	0.44	10	0.01	18	0.14	19	0.44	15	0.32	26	0.38
Ohlsson 1999		17	0.51	43	0.00	14	0.18	15	0.53	6	0.69	11	0.60
Olejniczac 1990		51	0.34	58	0.00	55	0.03	63	0.03	34	0.12	57	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		48	0.37	24	0.00	38	0.06	44	0.06	18	0.36	42	0.15
Osinska 1989		11	0.55	18	0.00	11	0.15	11	0.57	18	0.50	18	0.53
Paderewski 1912		32	0.44	37	0.00	22	0.09	22	0.34	4	0.49	24	0.41
Perahia 1994		7	0.57	4	0.03	4	0.20	8	0.64	4	0.73	9	0.68
Perlemuter 1986		9	0.55	6	0.02	5	0.26	6	0.70	4	0.73	5	0.71
Poblocka 1999		50	0.35	23	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	22	0.27	45	0.13
Rangell 2001		21	0.49	28	0.00	27	0.08	23	0.33	6	0.66	21	0.47
Risler 1920		62	0.25	60	0.00	62	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.04	65	0.04
Rosen 1989		61	0.27	31	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.06	64	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		6	0.58	17	0.00	3	0.27	7	0.70	4	0.76	2	0.73
Rubinstein 1952		10	0.55	19	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.56	7	0.63	14	0.59
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.61	8	0.01	2	0.27	4	0.72	7	0.68	6	0.70
Rummel 1943		60	0.30	55	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	26	0.20	51	0.10
Shebanova 2002		16	0.52	27	0.00	19	0.12	18	0.44	13	0.54	20	0.49
Smith 1975		40	0.39	20	0.00	31	0.10	31	0.19	6	0.37	32	0.27
Szpilman 1948		41	0.39	33	0.00	36	0.07	38	0.07	27	0.31	40	0.15
Uninsky 1971		19	0.50	29	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.39	4	0.65	19	0.50
Wasowski 1980		33	0.43	45	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.08	24	0.25	43	0.14
Weissenberg 1971		37	0.41	62	0.00	42	0.09	34	0.09	18	0.36	35	0.18
Average		1	0.72	1	0.75	1	0.74	1	0.88	6	0.59	4	0.72
Random 1		66	-0.02	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	61	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		65	0.00	54	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	31	0.13	61	0.05
Random 3		64	0.04	56	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	15	0.27	54	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).