Kitain 1937

Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	42	0.25	15	0.01	24	0.11	22	0.37	20	0.27	10	0.32
Ashkenazy 1981	53	0.20	66	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	58	0.04	64	0.04
Beliavsky 2004	26	0.29	9	0.01	15	0.12	21	0.38	22	0.27	9	0.32
BenOr 1989	33	0.27	43	0.00	43	0.10	33	0.10	52	0.06	33	0.08
Biret 1990	36	0.26	52	0.00	38	0.09	34	0.09	52	0.05	35	0.07
Blet 2003	64	0.14	64	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	44	0.06	59	0.04
Block 1995	38	0.25	50	0.00	39	0.07	41	0.07	63	0.03	48	0.05
Brailowsky 1960	49	0.22	40	0.00	53	0.05	46	0.05	54	0.06	46	0.05
Chiu 1999	51	0.21	31	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	58	0.03	56	0.04
Clidat 1994	31	0.28	48	0.00	36	0.09	35	0.09	62	0.04	42	0.06
Cohen 1997	57	0.18	63	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	37	0.07	51	0.05
Coop 1987	16	0.33	19	0.00	22	0.09	14	0.46	58	0.04	24	0.14
Cortot 1951	13	0.34	20	0.00	23	0.11	24	0.35	13	0.58	3	0.45
Czerny 1949	5	0.39	13	0.01	16	0.11	18	0.42	44	0.06	19	0.16
Czerny 1949b	2	0.41	5	0.05	8	0.16	8	0.59	31	0.19	8	0.33
Ezaki 2006	48	0.22	54	0.00	50	0.05	50	0.05	59	0.05	44	0.05
Falvay 1989	63	0.15	38	0.00	57	0.05	51	0.05	61	0.04	57	0.04
Ferenczy 1958	59	0.18	37	0.00	59	0.03	61	0.03	57	0.05	60	0.04
Fiorentino 1962	56	0.19	47	0.00	64	0.04	56	0.04	55	0.06	52	0.05
Fliere 1977	50	0.22	61	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.04	54	0.04
Fou 1978	43	0.24	28	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.06	45	0.06	39	0.06
Francois 1956	58	0.18	57	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	61	0.03	66	0.03
Hatto 1997	12	0.35	7	0.04	12	0.15	10	0.51	27	0.29	6	0.38
Horowitz 1971	8	0.37	11	0.01	5	0.18	4	0.69	25	0.27	4	0.43
Horowitz 1985	19	0.31	3	0.09	6	0.18	13	0.47	22	0.27	7	0.36
Indjic 2001	10	0.35	8	0.01	11	0.12	9	0.52	26	0.32	5	0.41
Kapell 1951	46	0.23	53	0.00	28	0.06	32	0.13	52	0.05	32	0.08
Kiepura 1999	14	0.33	51	0.00	18	0.10	19	0.41	58	0.04	25	0.13
Kilenyi 1937	54	0.19	49	0.00	58	0.03	60	0.03	57	0.05	61	0.04
Kissin 1993	3	0.40	10	0.01	4	0.18	2	0.76	18	0.51	1	0.62
Kitain 1937	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1990	32	0.27	44	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.13	62	0.03	41	0.06
Levy 1951	35	0.27	36	0.00	34	0.07	42	0.07	57	0.05	37	0.06
Luisada 1990	45	0.23	21	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	58	0.04	63	0.04
Lushtak 2004	6	0.38	14	0.01	9	0.17	6	0.64	32	0.13	12	0.29
Lympany 1968	30	0.28	41	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.18	51	0.05	29	0.09
Magaloff 1977	52	0.20	35	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.03	65	0.03
Magaloff 1977b	41	0.25	34	0.00	42	0.08	39	0.08	40	0.05	43	0.06
Magin 1975	28	0.28	60	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.08	54	0.05	38	0.06
Milkina 1970	17	0.33	22	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.48	42	0.06	18	0.17
Mohovich 1999	40	0.25	39	0.00	32	0.07	29	0.14	42	0.06	30	0.09
Nadelmann 1956	9	0.36	4	0.08	3	0.17	5	0.67	33	0.09	14	0.25
Ohlsson 1999	47	0.23	32	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.14	58	0.04	34	0.07
Olejniczac 1990	55	0.19	65	0.00	63	0.03	64	0.03	57	0.05	62	0.04
Olejniczak 1991	62	0.16	59	0.00	62	0.03	59	0.03	54	0.06	58	0.04
Osinska 1989	25	0.29	29	0.00	37	0.08	40	0.08	62	0.03	45	0.05
Paderewski 1912	20	0.31	26	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.40	35	0.08	17	0.18
Perahia 1994	4	0.39	2	0.11	2	0.21	3	0.74	23	0.28	2	0.46
Perlemuter 1986	23	0.30	30	0.00	25	0.14	23	0.35	50	0.05	26	0.13
Poblocka 1999	29	0.28	16	0.01	27	0.07	28	0.15	53	0.04	31	0.08
Rangell 2001	24	0.30	25	0.00	20	0.13	26	0.33	38	0.07	23	0.15
Risler 1920	44	0.24	62	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	53	0.04	55	0.04
Rosen 1989	61	0.16	27	0.00	52	0.04	53	0.04	49	0.06	50	0.05
Rubinstein 1939	7	0.37	45	0.00	10	0.14	7	0.62	29	0.16	11	0.31
Rubinstein 1952	34	0.27	23	0.00	35	0.08	37	0.08	61	0.03	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1966	11	0.35	12	0.01	17	0.13	16	0.45	63	0.04	27	0.13
Rummel 1943	37	0.26	58	0.00	41	0.08	36	0.08	60	0.03	49	0.05
Shebanova 2002	21	0.30	17	0.01	33	0.06	43	0.06	62	0.04	47	0.05
Smith 1975	27	0.29	6	0.04	7	0.17	11	0.50	29	0.14	13	0.26
Szpilman 1948	39	0.25	55	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	48	0.06	36	0.06
Uninsky 1971	18	0.32	33	0.00	26	0.14	25	0.34	38	0.07	21	0.15
Wasowski 1980	15	0.33	24	0.00	14	0.11	17	0.43	47	0.05	20	0.15
Weissenberg 1971	22	0.30	18	0.00	19	0.09	15	0.45	37	0.08	16	0.19
Average	1	0.46	1	0.44	1	0.44	1	0.83	57	0.05	15	0.20
Random 1	66	0.05	46	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	11	0.34	40	0.06
Random 2	60	0.17	42	0.00	61	0.03	62	0.03	1	0.78	22	0.15
Random 3	65	0.10	56	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	2	0.54	28	0.10

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).