Biret 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.34	40	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	31	0.10	55	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.44	11	0.01	37	0.07	34	0.07	21	0.34	33	0.15
Beliavsky 2004		48	0.37	9	0.01	50	0.05	53	0.05	19	0.34	39	0.13
BenOr 1989		2	0.56	2	0.06	2	0.43	2	0.80	7	0.68	1	0.74
Biret 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Blet 2003		47	0.37	57	0.00	43	0.05	51	0.05	34	0.08	52	0.06
Block 1995		21	0.43	30	0.00	34	0.06	46	0.06	19	0.32	35	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		20	0.43	6	0.01	20	0.07	14	0.37	30	0.20	22	0.27
Chiu 1999		34	0.40	49	0.00	44	0.05	54	0.05	22	0.33	37	0.13
Clidat 1994		9	0.46	33	0.00	16	0.09	16	0.34	21	0.32	19	0.33
Cohen 1997		62	0.25	56	0.00	62	0.06	42	0.06	32	0.11	48	0.08
Coop 1987		6	0.49	26	0.00	7	0.24	6	0.56	28	0.33	8	0.43
Cortot 1951		63	0.23	41	0.00	63	0.05	50	0.05	44	0.06	61	0.05
Czerny 1949		59	0.31	62	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	42	0.07	54	0.06
Czerny 1949b		58	0.31	63	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	40	0.06	58	0.05
Ezaki 2006		7	0.48	8	0.01	8	0.20	7	0.51	19	0.51	6	0.51
Falvay 1989		40	0.39	59	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	44	0.06	47	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		23	0.42	44	0.00	17	0.08	12	0.38	21	0.48	9	0.43
Fiorentino 1962		36	0.39	46	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.07	21	0.37	31	0.16
Fliere 1977		35	0.39	34	0.00	36	0.06	44	0.06	27	0.25	40	0.12
Fou 1978		39	0.39	14	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.06	27	0.37	32	0.15
Francois 1956		60	0.30	39	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	38	0.06	63	0.04
Hatto 1997		54	0.34	64	0.00	56	0.06	40	0.06	47	0.06	53	0.06
Horowitz 1971		11	0.45	28	0.00	11	0.09	10	0.41	15	0.46	10	0.43
Horowitz 1985		33	0.40	38	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.18	24	0.24	25	0.21
Indjic 2001		55	0.34	60	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	46	0.07	59	0.05
Kapell 1951		32	0.40	27	0.00	26	0.07	21	0.24	17	0.48	16	0.34
Kiepura 1999		30	0.41	50	0.00	33	0.05	47	0.05	28	0.16	45	0.09
Kilenyi 1937		12	0.45	15	0.00	6	0.21	5	0.57	15	0.60	3	0.58
Kissin 1993		28	0.41	19	0.00	47	0.07	37	0.07	34	0.11	46	0.09
Kitain 1937		61	0.26	54	0.00	61	0.05	52	0.05	34	0.09	51	0.07
Kushner 1990		18	0.43	3	0.02	13	0.08	23	0.22	30	0.20	26	0.21
Levy 1951		44	0.39	21	0.00	46	0.07	39	0.07	28	0.24	38	0.13
Luisada 1990		51	0.35	37	0.00	53	0.06	45	0.06	30	0.18	44	0.10
Lushtak 2004		10	0.45	18	0.00	15	0.07	17	0.33	19	0.32	21	0.32
Lympany 1968		19	0.43	31	0.00	23	0.07	26	0.20	13	0.51	20	0.32
Magaloff 1977		38	0.39	48	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	17	0.37	34	0.14
Magaloff 1977b		42	0.39	47	0.00	41	0.05	57	0.05	10	0.39	36	0.14
Magin 1975		27	0.41	32	0.00	12	0.08	13	0.37	26	0.34	15	0.35
Milkina 1970		5	0.50	4	0.02	5	0.24	9	0.45	24	0.30	13	0.37
Mohovich 1999		57	0.32	36	0.00	60	0.03	62	0.03	57	0.05	62	0.04
Nadelmann 1956		15	0.44	16	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.23	44	0.06	42	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		25	0.42	45	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.31	15	0.35	17	0.33
Olejniczac 1990		31	0.40	35	0.00	40	0.09	33	0.09	26	0.32	30	0.17
Olejniczak 1991		22	0.43	29	0.00	30	0.10	25	0.22	20	0.31	23	0.26
Osinska 1989		4	0.52	7	0.01	4	0.22	4	0.67	19	0.49	4	0.57
Paderewski 1912		41	0.39	13	0.00	10	0.09	30	0.16	10	0.40	24	0.25
Perahia 1994		16	0.44	22	0.00	19	0.07	24	0.22	30	0.16	28	0.19
Perlemuter 1986		26	0.41	42	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	33	0.08	50	0.07
Poblocka 1999		43	0.39	24	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.18	30	0.19	29	0.18
Rangell 2001		56	0.32	55	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	39	0.06	60	0.05
Risler 1920		45	0.38	20	0.00	25	0.07	19	0.27	3	0.59	12	0.40
Rosen 1989		37	0.39	10	0.01	27	0.08	20	0.24	23	0.56	14	0.37
Rubinstein 1939		24	0.42	25	0.00	14	0.07	27	0.19	34	0.08	41	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		8	0.48	12	0.01	9	0.17	8	0.49	23	0.41	7	0.45
Rubinstein 1966		3	0.54	5	0.01	3	0.38	3	0.73	12	0.52	2	0.62
Rummel 1943		50	0.35	61	0.00	48	0.07	35	0.07	28	0.17	43	0.11
Shebanova 2002		13	0.44	23	0.00	21	0.07	11	0.40	27	0.27	18	0.33
Smith 1975		52	0.35	51	0.00	42	0.05	55	0.05	36	0.06	57	0.05
Szpilman 1948		49	0.36	43	0.00	51	0.04	59	0.04	33	0.11	49	0.07
Uninsky 1971		17	0.43	17	0.00	22	0.07	15	0.35	17	0.49	11	0.41
Wasowski 1980		46	0.38	53	0.00	54	0.06	43	0.06	56	0.04	56	0.05
Weissenberg 1971		29	0.41	52	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.11	21	0.33	27	0.19
Average		1	0.67	1	0.76	1	0.75	1	0.89	17	0.35	5	0.56
Random 1		64	-0.02	58	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	42	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		66	-0.12	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	66	0.01	66	0.01
Random 3		65	-0.04	66	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	47	0.04	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).