Afanassiev 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.35	16	0.00	24	0.08	24	0.24	45	0.06	27	0.12
Beliavsky 2004		50	0.27	39	0.00	44	0.05	48	0.05	55	0.05	48	0.05
BenOr 1989		35	0.31	38	0.00	35	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.05	53	0.05
Biret 1990		23	0.34	53	0.00	31	0.05	31	0.10	58	0.04	45	0.06
Blet 2003		52	0.25	56	0.00	57	0.07	33	0.07	48	0.06	41	0.06
Block 1995		34	0.31	26	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	56	0.04	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.18	23	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.04	57	0.04
Chiu 1999		26	0.33	17	0.00	27	0.06	27	0.17	32	0.10	24	0.13
Clidat 1994		18	0.35	14	0.01	22	0.07	19	0.32	35	0.08	17	0.16
Cohen 1997		48	0.28	45	0.00	43	0.06	38	0.06	19	0.36	21	0.15
Coop 1987		6	0.42	5	0.03	5	0.24	5	0.65	37	0.08	12	0.23
Cortot 1951		41	0.30	57	0.00	39	0.05	52	0.05	15	0.51	18	0.16
Czerny 1949		29	0.32	42	0.00	19	0.09	21	0.27	43	0.06	26	0.13
Czerny 1949b		40	0.30	30	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.18	51	0.05	28	0.09
Ezaki 2006		44	0.29	12	0.01	29	0.05	30	0.11	53	0.06	31	0.08
Falvay 1989		14	0.37	7	0.02	20	0.08	23	0.25	38	0.07	25	0.13
Ferenczy 1958		47	0.28	62	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.05	62	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		38	0.31	60	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.06	47	0.08	37	0.07
Fliere 1977		49	0.27	66	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.04	56	0.04
Fou 1978		61	0.21	43	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	62	0.03	59	0.04
Francois 1956		21	0.35	34	0.00	18	0.07	17	0.34	23	0.31	8	0.32
Hatto 1997		7	0.40	29	0.00	9	0.16	7	0.59	22	0.40	4	0.49
Horowitz 1971		30	0.32	13	0.01	33	0.06	36	0.06	54	0.04	52	0.05
Horowitz 1985		20	0.35	46	0.00	14	0.10	15	0.38	43	0.08	15	0.17
Indjic 2001		8	0.40	9	0.01	8	0.13	6	0.59	23	0.42	3	0.50
Kapell 1951		60	0.22	65	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.04	60	0.04
Kiepura 1999		32	0.31	15	0.01	41	0.05	50	0.05	63	0.03	55	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		45	0.28	40	0.00	36	0.05	49	0.05	47	0.07	42	0.06
Kissin 1993		3	0.46	3	0.08	3	0.43	3	0.67	16	0.57	1	0.62
Kitain 1937		55	0.25	11	0.01	23	0.08	20	0.27	22	0.37	7	0.32
Kushner 1990		31	0.31	49	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.05	58	0.04	61	0.04
Levy 1951		33	0.31	18	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.06	47	0.05
Luisada 1990		58	0.23	51	0.00	60	0.05	46	0.05	62	0.03	63	0.04
Lushtak 2004		12	0.38	36	0.00	10	0.15	10	0.53	28	0.17	9	0.30
Lympany 1968		22	0.34	20	0.00	38	0.05	45	0.05	46	0.05	46	0.05
Magaloff 1977		36	0.31	44	0.00	46	0.06	37	0.06	35	0.06	43	0.06
Magaloff 1977b		39	0.31	59	0.00	47	0.06	39	0.06	32	0.11	33	0.08
Magin 1975		54	0.25	47	0.00	49	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.03	66	0.03
Milkina 1970		2	0.48	2	0.26	2	0.42	2	0.76	20	0.40	2	0.55
Mohovich 1999		59	0.23	8	0.01	25	0.07	29	0.12	40	0.06	34	0.08
Nadelmann 1956		16	0.36	41	0.00	16	0.09	13	0.46	52	0.04	23	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.34	10	0.01	17	0.10	18	0.33	28	0.16	13	0.23
Olejniczac 1990		43	0.29	55	0.00	45	0.06	35	0.06	47	0.07	44	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		53	0.25	64	0.00	56	0.05	44	0.05	35	0.10	36	0.07
Osinska 1989		9	0.40	50	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.47	57	0.04	22	0.14
Paderewski 1912		37	0.31	33	0.00	21	0.08	22	0.26	33	0.09	20	0.15
Perahia 1994		13	0.38	25	0.00	15	0.08	14	0.46	31	0.15	11	0.26
Perlemuter 1986		4	0.42	6	0.02	4	0.26	4	0.66	25	0.22	6	0.38
Poblocka 1999		46	0.28	28	0.00	54	0.05	47	0.05	60	0.04	58	0.04
Rangell 2001		57	0.23	35	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.05	54	0.05
Risler 1920		42	0.30	27	0.00	34	0.05	41	0.05	39	0.07	40	0.06
Rosen 1989		63	0.16	19	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.06	50	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		5	0.42	32	0.00	7	0.12	9	0.55	33	0.12	10	0.26
Rubinstein 1952		17	0.36	37	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.17	60	0.03	38	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.40	48	0.00	11	0.22	11	0.53	55	0.05	16	0.16
Rummel 1943		56	0.24	24	0.00	50	0.05	42	0.05	52	0.04	65	0.04
Shebanova 2002		15	0.36	31	0.00	12	0.13	16	0.38	49	0.06	19	0.15
Smith 1975		11	0.38	4	0.03	6	0.19	8	0.57	21	0.25	5	0.38
Szpilman 1948		25	0.33	22	0.00	37	0.05	57	0.05	35	0.10	35	0.07
Uninsky 1971		51	0.26	52	0.00	55	0.06	34	0.06	53	0.05	49	0.05
Wasowski 1980		27	0.32	54	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.12	63	0.03	39	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		28	0.32	21	0.00	32	0.05	32	0.09	35	0.09	29	0.09
Average		1	0.52	1	0.41	1	0.40	1	0.83	58	0.05	14	0.20
Random 1		64	0.03	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	9	0.37	30	0.09
Random 2		66	0.02	63	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	20	0.29	32	0.08
Random 3		65	0.03	58	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	14	0.28	51	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).