Wasowski 1980

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.32	61	0.00	58	0.03	62	0.03	28	0.12	51	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		48	0.34	40	0.00	44	0.05	45	0.05	35	0.07	53	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		58	0.30	31	0.00	55	0.03	61	0.03	28	0.17	45	0.07
BenOr 1989		6	0.51	53	0.00	6	0.18	6	0.56	17	0.58	8	0.57
Biret 1990		41	0.38	52	0.00	46	0.04	55	0.04	43	0.06	58	0.05
Blet 2003		55	0.31	39	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.06	42	0.06	50	0.06
Block 1995		24	0.43	13	0.01	19	0.09	19	0.35	25	0.21	21	0.27
Brailowsky 1960		34	0.40	45	0.00	37	0.11	33	0.11	34	0.10	41	0.10
Chiu 1999		18	0.44	4	0.05	17	0.09	14	0.42	7	0.53	14	0.47
Clidat 1994		43	0.36	44	0.00	51	0.04	50	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.04
Cohen 1997		62	0.28	62	0.00	52	0.04	53	0.04	23	0.30	40	0.11
Coop 1987		21	0.43	37	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.21	42	0.07	38	0.12
Cortot 1951		60	0.29	20	0.00	56	0.04	56	0.04	26	0.34	39	0.12
Czerny 1949		4	0.54	2	0.10	5	0.28	2	0.72	7	0.70	2	0.71
Czerny 1949b		10	0.47	32	0.00	21	0.09	18	0.35	13	0.56	15	0.44
Ezaki 2006		1	0.60	1	0.47	1	0.46	3	0.71	5	0.66	3	0.68
Falvay 1989		51	0.33	43	0.00	53	0.04	57	0.04	51	0.05	60	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.38	49	0.00	14	0.10	21	0.33	23	0.45	17	0.39
Fiorentino 1962		36	0.40	46	0.00	34	0.10	34	0.10	26	0.36	26	0.19
Fliere 1977		39	0.38	26	0.00	42	0.09	36	0.09	33	0.09	42	0.09
Fou 1978		2	0.58	3	0.07	2	0.42	1	0.72	1	0.74	1	0.73
Francois 1956		32	0.41	16	0.01	35	0.08	38	0.08	7	0.52	25	0.20
Hatto 1997		14	0.45	7	0.04	12	0.12	13	0.43	14	0.54	12	0.48
Horowitz 1971		7	0.50	10	0.02	10	0.13	11	0.46	11	0.52	11	0.49
Horowitz 1985		33	0.40	54	0.00	40	0.10	35	0.10	25	0.26	32	0.16
Indjic 2001		17	0.45	15	0.01	18	0.09	15	0.40	13	0.57	13	0.48
Kapell 1951		37	0.39	18	0.00	33	0.09	37	0.09	23	0.35	28	0.18
Kiepura 1999		28	0.42	59	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.06	35	0.06	48	0.06
Kilenyi 1937		13	0.46	29	0.00	9	0.22	10	0.48	20	0.53	10	0.50
Kissin 1993		47	0.35	33	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	37	0.10	46	0.07
Kitain 1937		52	0.33	28	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	16	0.45	37	0.15
Kushner 1990		5	0.52	5	0.04	3	0.34	5	0.63	7	0.70	5	0.66
Levy 1951		15	0.45	35	0.00	11	0.14	9	0.48	2	0.68	7	0.57
Luisada 1990		35	0.40	22	0.00	41	0.08	39	0.08	24	0.27	36	0.15
Lushtak 2004		30	0.41	11	0.02	25	0.08	30	0.20	24	0.21	24	0.20
Lympany 1968		61	0.28	56	0.00	62	0.06	44	0.06	48	0.05	54	0.05
Magaloff 1977		50	0.33	63	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	36	0.06	56	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		54	0.32	48	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	38	0.06	57	0.05
Magin 1975		12	0.46	6	0.04	22	0.11	25	0.26	35	0.12	27	0.18
Milkina 1970		23	0.43	24	0.00	24	0.09	23	0.27	37	0.08	35	0.15
Mohovich 1999		56	0.30	51	0.00	50	0.04	54	0.04	57	0.05	64	0.04
Nadelmann 1956		42	0.38	30	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.08	57	0.04	49	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.34	64	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	38	0.06	55	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		29	0.42	47	0.00	27	0.06	26	0.22	19	0.45	20	0.31
Olejniczak 1991		27	0.42	42	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.28	16	0.38	19	0.33
Osinska 1989		11	0.46	27	0.00	16	0.09	16	0.37	41	0.07	33	0.16
Paderewski 1912		44	0.36	19	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	36	0.07	52	0.06
Perahia 1994		16	0.45	21	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.26	31	0.13	29	0.18
Perlemuter 1986		25	0.42	34	0.00	28	0.06	28	0.21	30	0.14	31	0.17
Poblocka 1999		3	0.55	9	0.03	4	0.40	4	0.66	3	0.71	4	0.68
Rangell 2001		9	0.49	8	0.03	7	0.16	8	0.54	1	0.74	6	0.63
Risler 1920		59	0.30	57	0.00	59	0.03	60	0.03	48	0.05	59	0.04
Rosen 1989		31	0.41	36	0.00	15	0.11	20	0.33	20	0.57	16	0.43
Rubinstein 1939		19	0.44	12	0.01	20	0.09	17	0.37	18	0.35	18	0.36
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.38	17	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.13	43	0.05	43	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		20	0.44	38	0.00	13	0.12	12	0.45	33	0.11	23	0.22
Rummel 1943		45	0.35	50	0.00	54	0.04	51	0.04	47	0.05	63	0.04
Shebanova 2002		8	0.50	14	0.01	8	0.20	7	0.55	9	0.57	9	0.56
Smith 1975		22	0.43	25	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.20	31	0.12	34	0.15
Szpilman 1948		46	0.35	41	0.00	36	0.08	41	0.08	24	0.37	30	0.17
Uninsky 1971		26	0.42	23	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.18	26	0.26	22	0.22
Wasowski 1980		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Weissenberg 1971		57	0.30	55	0.00	61	0.04	52	0.04	53	0.05	61	0.04
Random 1		65	-0.01	65	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	17	0.28	44	0.07
Random 2		64	0.00	58	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	27	0.24	47	0.07
Random 3		63	0.01	60	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	41	0.06	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).