Uninsky 1971

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   59  0.2662  0.0059  0.0552  0.0534  0.0657  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   35  0.3656  0.0031  0.0731  0.1529  0.1528  0.15
Beliavsky 2004   28  0.385  0.0415  0.1222  0.386  0.6015  0.48
BenOr 1989   34  0.3628  0.0034  0.0644  0.0643  0.0752  0.06
Biret 1990   16  0.4323  0.0019  0.1016  0.4914  0.3618  0.42
Blet 2003   52  0.3145  0.0017  0.1023  0.3128  0.2224  0.26
Block 1995   13  0.4416  0.018  0.1210  0.5711  0.4612  0.51
Brailowsky 1960   47  0.3349  0.0047  0.0548  0.0541  0.0843  0.06
Chiu 1999   22  0.4021  0.0016  0.1120  0.418  0.5216  0.46
Clidat 1994   6  0.476  0.0410  0.139  0.576  0.5110  0.54
Cohen 1997   56  0.2732  0.0056  0.0641  0.0620  0.3230  0.14
Coop 1987   4  0.4810  0.0212  0.165  0.5931  0.2720  0.40
Cortot 1951   5  0.474  0.0611  0.136  0.593  0.801  0.69
Czerny 1949   18  0.4213  0.0118  0.0919  0.4620  0.3421  0.40
Czerny 1949b   36  0.3648  0.0035  0.0645  0.0642  0.0645  0.06
Ezaki 2006   38  0.3624  0.0042  0.0458  0.0442  0.0942  0.06
Falvay 1989   12  0.443  0.0613  0.178  0.5716  0.528  0.54
Ferenczy 1958   54  0.2963  0.0055  0.0551  0.0548  0.0749  0.06
Fiorentino 1962   45  0.3334  0.0040  0.0547  0.0536  0.0941  0.07
Fliere 1977   23  0.4012  0.0227  0.0829  0.1736  0.0733  0.11
Fou 1978   42  0.3447  0.0049  0.0733  0.0733  0.1238  0.09
Francois 1956   57  0.2753  0.0061  0.0549  0.0553  0.0462  0.04
Hatto 1997   9  0.469  0.034  0.1812  0.5411  0.605  0.57
Horowitz 1971   8  0.4611  0.029  0.117  0.589  0.546  0.56
Horowitz 1985   21  0.408  0.0314  0.1213  0.548  0.567  0.55
Indjic 2001   11  0.4520  0.005  0.1515  0.5015  0.5611  0.53
Kapell 1951   27  0.3822  0.0043  0.0546  0.0532  0.2036  0.10
Kiepura 1999   10  0.4527  0.0020  0.1014  0.5119  0.3119  0.40
Kilenyi 1937   55  0.2861  0.0054  0.0461  0.0435  0.0950  0.06
Kissin 1993   7  0.4629  0.007  0.124  0.6212  0.604  0.61
Kitain 1937   49  0.3231  0.0050  0.0737  0.0724  0.3429  0.15
Kushner 1990   33  0.3642  0.0044  0.0738  0.0746  0.0546  0.06
Levy 1951   51  0.3144  0.0053  0.0457  0.0446  0.0655  0.05
Luisada 1990   60  0.2446  0.0058  0.0462  0.0447  0.0658  0.05
Lushtak 2004   2  0.512  0.192  0.252  0.695  0.672  0.68
Lympany 1968   19  0.4219  0.0122  0.1317  0.4611  0.5413  0.50
Magaloff 1977   44  0.3440  0.0039  0.0640  0.0627  0.2532  0.12
Magaloff 1977b   46  0.3341  0.0038  0.0459  0.0419  0.2737  0.10
Magin 1975   37  0.3633  0.0036  0.0639  0.0642  0.0644  0.06
Milkina 1970   3  0.507  0.033  0.223  0.6720  0.439  0.54
Mohovich 1999   50  0.3237  0.0052  0.0554  0.0555  0.0560  0.05
Nadelmann 1956   39  0.3535  0.0025  0.0924  0.2945  0.0631  0.13
Ohlsson 1999   53  0.2957  0.0051  0.0734  0.0761  0.0456  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   48  0.3265  0.0048  0.0642  0.0636  0.0940  0.07
Olejniczak 1991   41  0.3554  0.0032  0.0732  0.1347  0.0835  0.10
Osinska 1989   15  0.4459  0.0023  0.1121  0.3943  0.0627  0.15
Paderewski 1912   32  0.3751  0.0028  0.0827  0.2521  0.3023  0.27
Perahia 1994   1  0.521  0.321  0.321  0.717  0.633  0.67
Perlemuter 1986   25  0.3943  0.0033  0.0735  0.0753  0.0547  0.06
Poblocka 1999   31  0.3717  0.0130  0.0930  0.1728  0.2126  0.19
Rangell 2001   29  0.3815  0.0141  0.0460  0.0428  0.1939  0.09
Risler 1920   58  0.2626  0.0057  0.0555  0.0543  0.0654  0.05
Rosen 1989   61  0.2338  0.0060  0.0556  0.0555  0.0659  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   24  0.4030  0.0029  0.1028  0.2246  0.0634  0.11
Rubinstein 1952   30  0.3825  0.0037  0.0736  0.0754  0.0461  0.05
Rubinstein 1966   43  0.3450  0.0046  0.0553  0.0537  0.0748  0.06
Rummel 1943   26  0.3939  0.0026  0.0925  0.2611  0.3522  0.30
Shebanova 2002   40  0.3552  0.0045  0.0643  0.0645  0.0651  0.06
Smith 1975   20  0.4118  0.016  0.1511  0.543  0.4614  0.50
Szpilman 1948   62  0.2055  0.0062  0.0550  0.0552  0.0553  0.05
Uninsky 1971   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Wasowski 1980   17  0.4214  0.0124  0.0926  0.2631  0.1825  0.22
Weissenberg 1971   14  0.4436  0.0021  0.1318  0.466  0.4717  0.46
Random 1    63  -0.0160  0.0063  0.0363  0.0349  0.0363  0.03
Random 2   65  -0.0958  0.0064  0.0264  0.0253  0.0464  0.03
Random 3   64  -0.0464  0.0065  0.0265  0.0260  0.0265  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).