Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		45	0.36	51	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	15	0.38	38	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.34	52	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	46	0.06	61	0.05
Beliavsky 2004		58	0.31	63	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	50	0.06	57	0.05
BenOr 1989		4	0.54	3	0.06	3	0.28	4	0.71	11	0.64	4	0.67
Biret 1990		26	0.44	28	0.00	29	0.10	25	0.35	10	0.41	25	0.38
Blet 2003		41	0.38	42	0.00	44	0.08	37	0.08	31	0.16	43	0.11
Block 1995		23	0.45	38	0.00	24	0.08	23	0.43	9	0.51	21	0.47
Brailowsky 1960		30	0.43	19	0.00	28	0.09	24	0.36	27	0.34	26	0.35
Chiu 1999		31	0.43	47	0.00	31	0.10	32	0.23	5	0.54	27	0.35
Clidat 1994		24	0.45	41	0.00	26	0.11	29	0.27	17	0.36	30	0.31
Cohen 1997		55	0.33	37	0.00	54	0.04	55	0.04	13	0.50	39	0.14
Coop 1987		9	0.50	24	0.00	14	0.15	15	0.52	23	0.42	19	0.47
Cortot 1951		61	0.26	26	0.00	62	0.05	52	0.05	38	0.08	54	0.06
Czerny 1949		14	0.47	18	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.55	12	0.58	10	0.56
Czerny 1949b		17	0.47	12	0.01	22	0.13	21	0.46	7	0.64	12	0.54
Ezaki 2006		1	0.61	1	0.51	1	0.50	1	0.83	1	0.80	1	0.81
Falvay 1989		22	0.45	30	0.00	20	0.12	18	0.48	15	0.56	15	0.52
Ferenczy 1958		3	0.56	5	0.03	5	0.39	3	0.73	2	0.78	3	0.75
Fiorentino 1962		38	0.39	61	0.00	38	0.07	40	0.07	28	0.30	40	0.14
Fliere 1977		35	0.41	15	0.01	27	0.07	30	0.25	5	0.57	24	0.38
Fou 1978		13	0.48	23	0.00	8	0.12	13	0.55	15	0.60	8	0.57
Francois 1956		54	0.33	29	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	39	0.06	62	0.05
Hatto 1997		33	0.42	34	0.00	40	0.08	36	0.08	25	0.31	37	0.16
Horowitz 1971		16	0.47	8	0.02	19	0.11	20	0.46	7	0.56	17	0.51
Horowitz 1985		53	0.34	43	0.00	46	0.07	39	0.07	42	0.08	47	0.07
Indjic 2001		36	0.40	35	0.00	41	0.06	44	0.06	28	0.26	42	0.12
Kapell 1951		56	0.32	64	0.00	56	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.06	56	0.05
Kiepura 1999		19	0.46	20	0.00	16	0.12	14	0.54	12	0.53	13	0.53
Kilenyi 1937		27	0.44	13	0.01	9	0.12	17	0.48	18	0.57	16	0.52
Kissin 1993		18	0.47	4	0.04	23	0.11	26	0.30	23	0.42	28	0.35
Kitain 1937		59	0.30	27	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	32	0.12	50	0.07
Kushner 1990		11	0.49	2	0.17	2	0.20	7	0.59	11	0.60	7	0.59
Levy 1951		37	0.40	45	0.00	30	0.12	27	0.29	12	0.53	23	0.39
Luisada 1990		48	0.35	58	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	26	0.22	45	0.10
Lushtak 2004		10	0.49	16	0.01	12	0.10	22	0.44	14	0.47	22	0.45
Lympany 1968		29	0.43	50	0.00	33	0.07	38	0.07	16	0.49	33	0.19
Magaloff 1977		51	0.35	62	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	34	0.06	58	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		57	0.32	57	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	45	0.05	60	0.05
Magin 1975		28	0.44	40	0.00	32	0.13	31	0.25	28	0.32	31	0.28
Milkina 1970		6	0.52	31	0.00	11	0.10	11	0.56	17	0.50	14	0.53
Mohovich 1999		39	0.38	17	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.09	23	0.35	34	0.18
Nadelmann 1956		21	0.46	9	0.01	18	0.12	16	0.50	21	0.23	29	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.46	32	0.00	21	0.13	19	0.47	8	0.51	18	0.49
Olejniczac 1990		40	0.38	53	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.07	33	0.12	46	0.09
Olejniczak 1991		44	0.37	46	0.00	37	0.07	42	0.07	28	0.20	41	0.12
Osinska 1989		7	0.51	25	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.58	15	0.52	11	0.55
Paderewski 1912		60	0.26	65	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	53	0.04	59	0.05
Perahia 1994		5	0.53	6	0.03	6	0.13	5	0.66	6	0.64	5	0.65
Perlemuter 1986		32	0.43	21	0.00	35	0.08	35	0.08	39	0.06	48	0.07
Poblocka 1999		2	0.56	7	0.02	4	0.25	2	0.77	2	0.73	2	0.75
Rangell 2001		42	0.37	55	0.00	51	0.04	58	0.04	24	0.28	44	0.11
Risler 1920		46	0.36	56	0.00	43	0.06	46	0.06	13	0.41	36	0.16
Rosen 1989		15	0.47	11	0.01	17	0.12	6	0.62	10	0.63	6	0.62
Rubinstein 1939		25	0.44	22	0.00	25	0.08	28	0.27	25	0.26	32	0.26
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.42	33	0.00	36	0.09	34	0.09	33	0.06	51	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.48	36	0.00	15	0.13	10	0.57	19	0.39	20	0.47
Rummel 1943		62	0.23	48	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	55	0.04	64	0.04
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		43	0.37	60	0.00	39	0.06	47	0.06	39	0.06	52	0.06
Szpilman 1948		49	0.35	14	0.01	45	0.07	43	0.07	25	0.35	35	0.16
Uninsky 1971		47	0.35	49	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	43	0.06	53	0.06
Wasowski 1980		8	0.50	10	0.01	10	0.14	9	0.57	7	0.55	9	0.56
Weissenberg 1971		50	0.35	44	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	46	0.06	55	0.05
Random 1		65	-0.02	59	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	43	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		64	-0.01	54	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	33	0.08	63	0.04
Random 3		63	0.04	39	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	22	0.22	49	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).