Paderewski 1912

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.31	28	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.09	20	0.29	27	0.16
Ashkenazy 1981		23	0.37	29	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.25	25	0.18	22	0.21
Beliavsky 2004		36	0.32	25	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.14	17	0.40	20	0.24
BenOr 1989		45	0.30	60	0.00	48	0.04	55	0.04	53	0.06	53	0.05
Biret 1990		14	0.39	13	0.01	12	0.08	9	0.41	29	0.17	19	0.26
Blet 2003		54	0.26	47	0.00	51	0.03	63	0.03	61	0.04	63	0.03
Block 1995		50	0.29	21	0.01	41	0.07	39	0.07	59	0.03	52	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		35	0.32	56	0.00	45	0.04	47	0.04	50	0.07	49	0.05
Chiu 1999		19	0.38	11	0.03	9	0.15	8	0.42	11	0.50	3	0.46
Clidat 1994		31	0.34	10	0.03	27	0.07	28	0.24	36	0.07	31	0.13
Cohen 1997		61	0.23	37	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.06	22	0.31	30	0.14
Coop 1987		46	0.30	63	0.00	49	0.03	58	0.03	61	0.04	62	0.03
Cortot 1951		33	0.33	5	0.05	6	0.16	24	0.28	9	0.60	6	0.41
Czerny 1949		9	0.40	38	0.00	15	0.09	14	0.36	31	0.15	21	0.23
Czerny 1949b		20	0.38	20	0.01	14	0.07	16	0.34	20	0.33	13	0.33
Ezaki 2006		62	0.23	53	0.00	62	0.04	46	0.04	60	0.05	54	0.04
Falvay 1989		30	0.35	27	0.00	36	0.07	40	0.07	34	0.07	37	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.25	64	0.00	52	0.03	62	0.03	59	0.04	64	0.03
Fiorentino 1962		39	0.31	42	0.00	55	0.04	52	0.04	39	0.09	47	0.06
Fliere 1977		52	0.28	57	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.06	50	0.05	48	0.05
Fou 1978		34	0.32	30	0.00	47	0.04	54	0.04	47	0.06	50	0.05
Francois 1956		25	0.36	14	0.01	30	0.07	30	0.17	13	0.45	17	0.28
Hatto 1997		24	0.37	43	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.28	40	0.07	29	0.14
Horowitz 1971		28	0.35	17	0.01	18	0.06	27	0.25	42	0.05	35	0.11
Horowitz 1985		44	0.31	52	0.00	35	0.07	41	0.07	54	0.06	40	0.06
Indjic 2001		21	0.37	51	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.30	27	0.28	16	0.29
Kapell 1951		55	0.26	36	0.00	50	0.03	57	0.03	55	0.04	61	0.03
Kiepura 1999		10	0.39	24	0.00	13	0.10	11	0.38	34	0.08	24	0.17
Kilenyi 1937		47	0.30	19	0.01	44	0.04	49	0.04	37	0.09	42	0.06
Kissin 1993		2	0.45	7	0.04	3	0.20	2	0.55	14	0.59	1	0.57
Kitain 1937		40	0.31	31	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.08	19	0.40	23	0.18
Kushner 1990		41	0.31	32	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.07	48	0.05	41	0.06
Levy 1951		26	0.36	35	0.00	26	0.11	20	0.31	20	0.35	12	0.33
Luisada 1990		37	0.32	48	0.00	39	0.08	34	0.08	50	0.05	44	0.06
Lushtak 2004		32	0.34	39	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.21	46	0.06	33	0.11
Lympany 1968		13	0.39	44	0.00	19	0.08	23	0.30	23	0.34	14	0.32
Magaloff 1977		8	0.40	12	0.02	20	0.07	13	0.36	11	0.42	9	0.39
Magaloff 1977b		12	0.39	22	0.00	22	0.07	15	0.35	7	0.41	11	0.38
Magin 1975		53	0.27	41	0.00	58	0.04	48	0.04	62	0.03	59	0.03
Milkina 1970		3	0.44	1	0.27	1	0.27	3	0.50	22	0.34	5	0.41
Mohovich 1999		49	0.29	23	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.07	45	0.06	46	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		1	0.46	2	0.20	2	0.26	1	0.57	19	0.26	10	0.38
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.39	18	0.01	10	0.13	10	0.39	24	0.25	15	0.31
Olejniczac 1990		43	0.31	9	0.03	56	0.03	60	0.03	52	0.06	57	0.04
Olejniczak 1991		38	0.31	45	0.00	54	0.04	45	0.04	34	0.11	38	0.07
Osinska 1989		29	0.35	59	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.14	51	0.05	36	0.08
Paderewski 1912		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perahia 1994		17	0.38	40	0.00	17	0.09	18	0.32	34	0.09	25	0.17
Perlemuter 1986		6	0.43	33	0.00	11	0.12	12	0.38	48	0.05	28	0.14
Poblocka 1999		48	0.30	46	0.00	57	0.03	56	0.03	60	0.04	58	0.03
Rangell 2001		18	0.38	49	0.00	16	0.07	19	0.32	12	0.57	4	0.43
Risler 1920		59	0.24	58	0.00	60	0.04	51	0.04	58	0.04	56	0.04
Rosen 1989		60	0.24	26	0.00	61	0.05	44	0.05	44	0.08	45	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		15	0.39	16	0.01	7	0.16	6	0.45	16	0.36	8	0.40
Rubinstein 1952		11	0.39	8	0.03	21	0.08	17	0.34	49	0.04	32	0.12
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.41	4	0.05	8	0.16	7	0.44	38	0.06	26	0.16
Rummel 1943		4	0.43	3	0.07	4	0.15	5	0.47	1	0.59	2	0.53
Shebanova 2002		56	0.26	65	0.00	46	0.04	53	0.04	49	0.06	51	0.05
Smith 1975		5	0.43	6	0.04	5	0.18	4	0.49	10	0.33	7	0.40
Szpilman 1948		51	0.28	34	0.00	59	0.04	50	0.04	51	0.05	55	0.04
Uninsky 1971		22	0.37	54	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.30	27	0.25	18	0.27
Wasowski 1980		27	0.36	15	0.01	38	0.07	36	0.07	48	0.05	39	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		58	0.24	62	0.00	53	0.03	59	0.03	59	0.04	60	0.03
Random 1		65	-0.06	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	59	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		64	0.00	50	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	30	0.18	43	0.06
Random 3		63	0.08	55	0.00	63	0.03	61	0.03	7	0.41	34	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).