Olejniczak 1991

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		54	0.25	58	0.00	54	0.10	35	0.10	43	0.05	46	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.28	13	0.00	51	0.09	37	0.09	39	0.07	41	0.08
Beliavsky 2004		62	0.04	64	0.00	61	0.03	61	0.03	60	0.03	63	0.03
BenOr 1989		7	0.50	6	0.00	9	0.20	9	0.63	22	0.54	9	0.58
Biret 1990		16	0.43	10	0.00	17	0.09	19	0.31	23	0.23	22	0.27
Blet 2003		4	0.54	7	0.00	4	0.40	3	0.79	6	0.71	3	0.75
Block 1995		29	0.38	17	0.00	20	0.09	21	0.28	26	0.18	26	0.22
Brailowsky 1960		14	0.45	39	0.00	16	0.18	15	0.41	29	0.32	15	0.36
Chiu 1999		50	0.29	28	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	35	0.07	49	0.06
Clidat 1994		41	0.34	59	0.00	43	0.06	54	0.06	40	0.07	51	0.06
Cohen 1997		60	0.16	52	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	48	0.06	57	0.05
Coop 1987		6	0.52	11	0.00	6	0.27	5	0.73	9	0.58	5	0.65
Cortot 1951		61	0.09	63	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	63	0.02	65	0.02
Czerny 1949		42	0.34	55	0.00	34	0.08	45	0.08	35	0.11	38	0.09
Czerny 1949b		47	0.31	60	0.00	46	0.08	41	0.08	37	0.07	45	0.07
Ezaki 2006		28	0.39	27	0.00	22	0.07	22	0.27	26	0.44	16	0.34
Falvay 1989		15	0.44	25	0.00	13	0.28	13	0.53	12	0.57	11	0.55
Ferenczy 1958		13	0.46	31	0.00	5	0.28	8	0.64	11	0.64	6	0.64
Fiorentino 1962		2	0.80	2	0.18	2	0.90	2	0.96	2	0.95	2	0.95
Fliere 1977		22	0.40	23	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.19	16	0.44	20	0.29
Fou 1978		24	0.40	14	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.24	30	0.33	21	0.28
Francois 1956		53	0.27	61	0.00	53	0.09	38	0.09	52	0.04	54	0.06
Hatto 1997		40	0.34	16	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.08	36	0.10	37	0.09
Horowitz 1971		34	0.36	53	0.00	35	0.09	39	0.09	39	0.07	42	0.08
Horowitz 1985		37	0.35	57	0.00	36	0.12	33	0.12	44	0.08	34	0.10
Indjic 2001		43	0.34	45	0.00	42	0.08	44	0.08	43	0.08	40	0.08
Kapell 1951		35	0.36	65	0.00	40	0.10	36	0.10	36	0.08	36	0.09
Kiepura 1999		27	0.39	50	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	36	0.06	39	0.08
Kilenyi 1937		12	0.47	43	0.00	8	0.20	10	0.62	11	0.61	7	0.61
Kissin 1993		55	0.22	12	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.04	58	0.04
Kitain 1937		59	0.16	48	0.00	60	0.06	53	0.06	58	0.03	60	0.04
Kushner 1990		18	0.41	18	0.00	18	0.10	18	0.36	33	0.14	25	0.22
Levy 1951		36	0.35	56	0.00	44	0.06	55	0.06	35	0.08	44	0.07
Luisada 1990		19	0.41	34	0.00	24	0.08	26	0.22	15	0.51	18	0.33
Lushtak 2004		51	0.28	54	0.00	50	0.09	40	0.09	57	0.04	52	0.06
Lympany 1968		48	0.31	62	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	49	0.05	55	0.05
Magaloff 1977		56	0.22	30	0.00	56	0.06	56	0.06	43	0.05	56	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		58	0.20	32	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	50	0.04	59	0.04
Magin 1975		3	0.55	3	0.01	3	0.29	6	0.71	8	0.66	4	0.68
Milkina 1970		33	0.37	19	0.00	14	0.13	17	0.36	43	0.06	29	0.15
Mohovich 1999		20	0.41	40	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.15	20	0.42	24	0.25
Nadelmann 1956		11	0.47	26	0.00	15	0.13	14	0.47	34	0.08	27	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.40	8	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.22	36	0.06	32	0.11
Olejniczac 1990		1	0.82	1	0.77	1	0.76	1	0.97	2	0.96	1	0.96
Olejniczak 1991		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		5	0.53	5	0.00	7	0.16	4	0.76	21	0.44	8	0.58
Paderewski 1912		46	0.31	37	0.00	52	0.11	34	0.11	45	0.04	47	0.07
Perahia 1994		49	0.30	44	0.00	49	0.08	48	0.08	52	0.05	53	0.06
Perlemuter 1986		9	0.48	4	0.00	12	0.20	12	0.59	17	0.38	13	0.47
Poblocka 1999		38	0.35	15	0.00	37	0.08	42	0.08	42	0.06	43	0.07
Rangell 2001		57	0.21	46	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04
Risler 1920		44	0.34	20	0.00	39	0.07	50	0.07	15	0.34	28	0.15
Rosen 1989		25	0.40	41	0.00	23	0.08	23	0.27	21	0.57	14	0.39
Rubinstein 1939		45	0.33	42	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	53	0.04	50	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		10	0.48	33	0.00	10	0.27	11	0.60	12	0.56	10	0.58
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.49	35	0.00	11	0.29	7	0.65	21	0.39	12	0.50
Rummel 1943		31	0.38	29	0.00	38	0.07	49	0.07	33	0.07	48	0.07
Shebanova 2002		32	0.37	22	0.00	25	0.07	28	0.20	42	0.07	31	0.12
Smith 1975		30	0.38	49	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.21	34	0.07	30	0.12
Szpilman 1948		21	0.40	24	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.17	23	0.40	23	0.26
Uninsky 1971		39	0.35	47	0.00	33	0.08	47	0.08	32	0.13	35	0.10
Wasowski 1980		17	0.42	51	0.00	19	0.13	16	0.38	22	0.28	17	0.33
Weissenberg 1971		26	0.39	9	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.31	21	0.30	19	0.30
Random 1		65	0.01	38	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	39	0.05	62	0.03
Random 2		63	0.03	36	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	14	0.39	33	0.11
Random 3		64	0.03	21	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	40	0.06	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).