Nadelmann 1956

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		54	0.36	32	0.00	48	0.04	51	0.04	11	0.49	49	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.37	65	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	27	0.18	60	0.08
Beliavsky 2004		62	0.21	42	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	40	0.08	63	0.05
BenOr 1989		25	0.45	16	0.01	20	0.07	15	0.31	24	0.51	17	0.40
Biret 1990		36	0.44	19	0.01	42	0.06	43	0.06	21	0.24	55	0.12
Blet 2003		10	0.48	28	0.00	13	0.11	13	0.38	13	0.60	10	0.48
Block 1995		38	0.43	57	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	15	0.36	41	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		1	0.62	1	0.53	1	0.52	1	0.70	1	0.80	1	0.75
Chiu 1999		58	0.34	24	0.00	59	0.05	49	0.05	37	0.07	62	0.06
Clidat 1994		28	0.45	9	0.02	19	0.08	25	0.21	5	0.52	24	0.33
Cohen 1997		61	0.28	64	0.00	61	0.05	48	0.05	16	0.46	44	0.15
Coop 1987		31	0.44	46	0.00	33	0.07	40	0.07	29	0.34	43	0.15
Cortot 1951		60	0.30	47	0.00	62	0.05	47	0.05	18	0.46	46	0.15
Czerny 1949		33	0.44	38	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.18	25	0.28	33	0.22
Czerny 1949b		26	0.45	43	0.00	27	0.08	22	0.22	6	0.65	19	0.38
Ezaki 2006		50	0.38	54	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	33	0.17	59	0.09
Falvay 1989		16	0.47	15	0.01	14	0.09	12	0.39	8	0.61	9	0.49
Ferenczy 1958		11	0.48	26	0.00	11	0.11	10	0.42	14	0.62	8	0.51
Fiorentino 1962		34	0.44	48	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.06	22	0.41	42	0.16
Fliere 1977		40	0.42	49	0.00	43	0.08	36	0.08	6	0.54	34	0.21
Fou 1978		44	0.41	55	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	31	0.25	57	0.10
Francois 1956		57	0.35	62	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	27	0.23	58	0.10
Hatto 1997		45	0.40	56	0.00	44	0.04	52	0.04	15	0.49	48	0.14
Horowitz 1971		14	0.48	22	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.30	4	0.63	15	0.43
Horowitz 1985		42	0.41	7	0.03	15	0.09	20	0.24	6	0.58	21	0.37
Indjic 2001		43	0.41	59	0.00	45	0.07	42	0.07	18	0.50	36	0.19
Kapell 1951		39	0.43	11	0.02	22	0.08	30	0.15	12	0.52	27	0.28
Kiepura 1999		8	0.50	10	0.02	5	0.17	6	0.52	1	0.69	6	0.60
Kilenyi 1937		12	0.48	53	0.00	26	0.06	23	0.22	19	0.57	22	0.35
Kissin 1993		21	0.46	35	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.07	19	0.47	39	0.18
Kitain 1937		55	0.36	6	0.03	35	0.09	33	0.09	4	0.68	32	0.25
Kushner 1990		27	0.45	34	0.00	34	0.07	41	0.07	18	0.46	38	0.18
Levy 1951		37	0.43	37	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.07	17	0.43	40	0.17
Luisada 1990		22	0.46	4	0.04	18	0.08	27	0.17	18	0.46	28	0.28
Lushtak 2004		30	0.44	52	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.13	13	0.54	31	0.26
Lympany 1968		20	0.46	23	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.14	5	0.63	25	0.30
Magaloff 1977		49	0.38	39	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	15	0.39	53	0.12
Magaloff 1977b		53	0.37	44	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	10	0.38	54	0.12
Magin 1975		4	0.54	12	0.01	6	0.14	5	0.57	4	0.70	4	0.63
Milkina 1970		32	0.44	20	0.00	9	0.09	14	0.34	18	0.44	18	0.39
Mohovich 1999		29	0.45	5	0.03	8	0.12	8	0.44	2	0.68	7	0.55
Nadelmann 1956		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.54	3	0.04	4	0.17	4	0.63	2	0.72	3	0.67
Olejniczac 1990		15	0.48	25	0.00	25	0.07	17	0.28	12	0.64	16	0.42
Olejniczak 1991		18	0.47	50	0.00	37	0.08	34	0.08	14	0.47	35	0.19
Osinska 1989		3	0.54	8	0.02	3	0.15	3	0.65	12	0.58	5	0.61
Paderewski 1912		24	0.46	40	0.00	24	0.08	19	0.26	1	0.57	20	0.38
Perahia 1994		7	0.50	21	0.00	10	0.11	11	0.40	10	0.56	12	0.47
Perlemuter 1986		2	0.55	2	0.11	2	0.21	2	0.65	4	0.74	2	0.69
Poblocka 1999		35	0.44	27	0.00	17	0.10	24	0.21	18	0.39	26	0.29
Rangell 2001		48	0.39	30	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	13	0.55	45	0.15
Risler 1920		47	0.40	58	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	9	0.48	47	0.14
Rosen 1989		59	0.34	33	0.00	57	0.04	55	0.04	30	0.41	52	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		19	0.47	41	0.00	30	0.07	28	0.15	14	0.49	30	0.27
Rubinstein 1952		9	0.49	18	0.01	12	0.16	9	0.43	19	0.49	14	0.46
Rubinstein 1966		6	0.52	14	0.01	7	0.14	7	0.47	16	0.47	11	0.47
Rummel 1943		17	0.47	17	0.01	29	0.07	29	0.15	4	0.54	29	0.28
Shebanova 2002		23	0.46	13	0.01	21	0.07	21	0.23	16	0.50	23	0.34
Smith 1975		46	0.40	61	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	26	0.16	56	0.10
Szpilman 1948		13	0.48	31	0.00	23	0.08	18	0.28	2	0.75	13	0.46
Uninsky 1971		56	0.35	29	0.00	47	0.06	45	0.06	24	0.29	50	0.13
Wasowski 1980		51	0.38	36	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	40	0.08	61	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		41	0.42	51	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.07	8	0.45	37	0.18
Random 1		65	-0.02	60	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	36	0.05	64	0.03
Random 2		63	0.09	45	0.00	63	0.03	62	0.03	5	0.56	51	0.13
Random 3		64	0.00	63	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	57	0.03	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).