Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		60	0.25	51	0.00	53	0.03	61	0.03	58	0.05	58	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		49	0.33	50	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.05	60	0.04
Beliavsky 2004		62	0.22	39	0.00	59	0.03	58	0.03	43	0.07	52	0.05
BenOr 1989		18	0.49	14	0.01	20	0.15	17	0.54	21	0.55	17	0.54
Biret 1990		32	0.41	48	0.00	27	0.09	26	0.35	11	0.38	28	0.36
Blet 2003		7	0.54	6	0.05	10	0.15	5	0.68	3	0.75	3	0.71
Block 1995		26	0.44	37	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.41	7	0.55	21	0.47
Brailowsky 1960		2	0.59	4	0.13	2	0.24	3	0.70	4	0.72	2	0.71
Chiu 1999		39	0.38	33	0.00	42	0.14	33	0.14	25	0.23	36	0.18
Clidat 1994		34	0.41	61	0.00	41	0.10	37	0.10	35	0.07	44	0.08
Cohen 1997		61	0.22	18	0.00	62	0.04	55	0.04	43	0.06	55	0.05
Coop 1987		37	0.40	13	0.01	38	0.11	36	0.11	53	0.05	45	0.07
Cortot 1951		56	0.29	47	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	32	0.15	42	0.09
Czerny 1949		10	0.53	5	0.07	5	0.20	9	0.65	3	0.73	6	0.69
Czerny 1949b		12	0.51	9	0.01	12	0.15	10	0.62	4	0.75	8	0.68
Ezaki 2006		13	0.51	42	0.00	15	0.16	11	0.62	6	0.66	10	0.64
Falvay 1989		15	0.50	26	0.00	11	0.19	14	0.60	3	0.66	11	0.63
Ferenczy 1958		40	0.37	59	0.00	24	0.10	24	0.37	22	0.47	24	0.42
Fiorentino 1962		5	0.57	3	0.17	3	0.29	6	0.67	4	0.73	5	0.70
Fliere 1977		29	0.43	53	0.00	35	0.10	38	0.10	15	0.44	33	0.21
Fou 1978		11	0.53	27	0.00	13	0.19	12	0.62	9	0.65	12	0.63
Francois 1956		41	0.37	64	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	29	0.20	40	0.10
Hatto 1997		52	0.31	36	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.06	53	0.05
Horowitz 1971		28	0.43	31	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.18	28	0.25	34	0.21
Horowitz 1985		35	0.41	23	0.00	17	0.14	21	0.45	7	0.56	20	0.50
Indjic 2001		54	0.29	43	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	52	0.04	59	0.04
Kapell 1951		22	0.47	16	0.01	22	0.12	22	0.43	5	0.60	19	0.51
Kiepura 1999		8	0.54	21	0.00	9	0.16	13	0.61	5	0.64	15	0.62
Kilenyi 1937		14	0.51	28	0.00	18	0.19	15	0.57	8	0.69	14	0.63
Kissin 1993		38	0.38	25	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	40	0.09	47	0.07
Kitain 1937		57	0.28	60	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	38	0.08	49	0.06
Kushner 1990		21	0.48	12	0.01	25	0.10	25	0.37	20	0.41	26	0.39
Levy 1951		44	0.35	40	0.00	34	0.09	40	0.09	27	0.31	37	0.17
Luisada 1990		1	0.63	1	0.24	1	0.24	2	0.71	1	0.81	1	0.76
Lushtak 2004		31	0.42	34	0.00	28	0.09	30	0.29	18	0.34	30	0.31
Lympany 1968		58	0.28	54	0.00	57	0.03	60	0.03	56	0.04	61	0.03
Magaloff 1977		43	0.36	35	0.00	43	0.05	45	0.05	18	0.33	38	0.13
Magaloff 1977b		51	0.32	11	0.01	44	0.06	44	0.06	24	0.21	39	0.11
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Milkina 1970		50	0.33	38	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	50	0.05	51	0.05
Mohovich 1999		48	0.34	24	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	35	0.06	54	0.05
Nadelmann 1956		9	0.54	8	0.01	14	0.19	4	0.70	5	0.57	13	0.63
Ohlsson 1999		19	0.48	22	0.00	26	0.14	27	0.34	9	0.46	25	0.40
Olejniczac 1990		4	0.57	10	0.01	4	0.24	7	0.67	7	0.73	4	0.70
Olejniczak 1991		6	0.55	30	0.00	7	0.15	8	0.66	6	0.71	7	0.68
Osinska 1989		3	0.58	7	0.02	8	0.14	1	0.71	10	0.62	9	0.66
Paderewski 1912		59	0.27	44	0.00	56	0.03	62	0.03	48	0.04	63	0.03
Perahia 1994		53	0.30	65	0.00	55	0.03	59	0.03	62	0.03	64	0.03
Perlemuter 1986		30	0.42	56	0.00	37	0.08	41	0.08	36	0.07	46	0.07
Poblocka 1999		23	0.47	20	0.00	19	0.14	20	0.47	15	0.46	22	0.46
Rangell 2001		55	0.29	15	0.01	60	0.04	54	0.04	40	0.06	56	0.05
Risler 1920		33	0.41	19	0.00	29	0.12	29	0.30	4	0.58	23	0.42
Rosen 1989		24	0.46	32	0.00	16	0.13	16	0.55	9	0.64	16	0.59
Rubinstein 1939		45	0.34	45	0.00	50	0.06	43	0.06	59	0.03	57	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		16	0.50	2	0.18	6	0.16	18	0.52	14	0.54	18	0.53
Rubinstein 1966		17	0.49	41	0.00	21	0.14	19	0.50	28	0.30	27	0.39
Rummel 1943		20	0.48	17	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.18	3	0.56	29	0.32
Shebanova 2002		27	0.44	62	0.00	30	0.14	28	0.32	31	0.25	31	0.28
Smith 1975		47	0.34	46	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	53	0.05	50	0.05
Szpilman 1948		36	0.41	55	0.00	36	0.13	34	0.13	19	0.49	32	0.25
Uninsky 1971		42	0.36	52	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.06	39	0.06	48	0.06
Wasowski 1980		25	0.46	49	0.00	33	0.12	35	0.12	25	0.26	35	0.18
Weissenberg 1971		46	0.34	29	0.00	40	0.09	39	0.09	42	0.07	43	0.08
Random 1		64	0.00	63	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	41	0.04	62	0.03
Random 2		63	0.03	57	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	18	0.30	41	0.09
Random 3		65	-0.04	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	59	0.03	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).