Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.35	51	0.00	33	0.06	44	0.06	22	0.26	32	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Beliavsky 2004		19	0.40	16	0.01	17	0.09	19	0.36	11	0.52	13	0.43
BenOr 1989		16	0.43	39	0.00	19	0.14	16	0.40	33	0.15	20	0.24
Biret 1990		13	0.44	31	0.00	18	0.09	18	0.37	34	0.07	26	0.16
Blet 2003		18	0.42	4	0.11	7	0.15	15	0.47	24	0.36	14	0.41
Block 1995		47	0.28	50	0.00	53	0.06	51	0.06	60	0.03	61	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.33	53	0.00	44	0.05	52	0.05	56	0.05	48	0.05
Chiu 1999		32	0.36	29	0.00	38	0.06	43	0.06	50	0.05	50	0.05
Clidat 1994		20	0.39	17	0.01	20	0.10	20	0.35	27	0.19	19	0.26
Cohen 1997		35	0.35	20	0.00	23	0.08	24	0.23	10	0.60	15	0.37
Coop 1987		6	0.49	14	0.01	4	0.16	8	0.67	12	0.51	8	0.58
Cortot 1951		59	0.20	56	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	48	0.06	55	0.05
Czerny 1949		56	0.24	57	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	56	0.05	53	0.05
Czerny 1949b		60	0.20	59	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	51	0.05	60	0.04
Ezaki 2006		27	0.38	40	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.07	39	0.10	37	0.08
Falvay 1989		21	0.39	32	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.07	49	0.05	45	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		52	0.27	36	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	46	0.07	46	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		55	0.25	43	0.00	51	0.06	40	0.06	45	0.08	42	0.07
Fliere 1977		12	0.45	8	0.03	13	0.21	12	0.55	2	0.62	7	0.58
Fou 1978		23	0.39	6	0.04	28	0.07	31	0.14	35	0.10	31	0.12
Francois 1956		14	0.43	22	0.00	14	0.13	14	0.49	4	0.64	11	0.56
Hatto 1997		7	0.48	47	0.00	8	0.15	6	0.68	7	0.64	4	0.66
Horowitz 1971		57	0.22	46	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04
Horowitz 1985		62	0.16	55	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.04	56	0.04
Indjic 2001		4	0.50	12	0.01	5	0.16	2	0.73	4	0.68	2	0.70
Kapell 1951		34	0.36	52	0.00	26	0.07	28	0.16	31	0.21	23	0.18
Kiepura 1999		40	0.34	61	0.00	42	0.08	33	0.08	61	0.04	43	0.06
Kilenyi 1937		45	0.33	48	0.00	46	0.08	34	0.08	54	0.06	41	0.07
Kissin 1993		11	0.45	13	0.01	16	0.09	17	0.39	26	0.31	16	0.35
Kitain 1937		58	0.20	62	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	51	0.05	62	0.04
Kushner 1990		15	0.43	33	0.00	15	0.14	13	0.51	31	0.20	17	0.32
Levy 1951		61	0.18	63	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.05	58	0.04
Luisada 1990		37	0.35	28	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	33	0.10	40	0.08
Lushtak 2004		26	0.38	41	0.00	25	0.10	21	0.31	42	0.07	28	0.15
Lympany 1968		41	0.34	27	0.00	24	0.08	23	0.24	26	0.29	18	0.26
Magaloff 1977		24	0.39	35	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.06	20	0.32	29	0.14
Magaloff 1977b		25	0.38	18	0.01	36	0.07	36	0.07	11	0.38	25	0.16
Magin 1975		44	0.33	34	0.00	50	0.05	54	0.05	56	0.04	59	0.04
Milkina 1970		1	0.55	2	0.19	2	0.26	1	0.78	8	0.62	1	0.70
Mohovich 1999		46	0.32	7	0.03	21	0.08	26	0.18	29	0.19	24	0.18
Nadelmann 1956		28	0.37	65	0.00	30	0.07	27	0.18	53	0.04	39	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.51	23	0.00	6	0.25	4	0.70	6	0.62	3	0.66
Olejniczac 1990		49	0.28	24	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	60	0.05	54	0.05
Olejniczak 1991		50	0.28	30	0.00	49	0.07	39	0.07	37	0.09	38	0.08
Osinska 1989		9	0.46	15	0.01	12	0.20	9	0.58	35	0.08	21	0.22
Paderewski 1912		29	0.37	49	0.00	29	0.06	25	0.18	26	0.25	22	0.21
Perahia 1994		31	0.37	19	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.25	44	0.07	30	0.13
Perlemuter 1986		17	0.43	10	0.02	11	0.19	11	0.55	18	0.38	12	0.46
Poblocka 1999		54	0.25	44	0.00	54	0.06	41	0.06	58	0.04	49	0.05
Rangell 2001		10	0.46	11	0.02	10	0.19	10	0.57	10	0.61	6	0.59
Risler 1920		51	0.27	54	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	46	0.05	57	0.04
Rosen 1989		48	0.28	9	0.02	27	0.07	32	0.12	37	0.10	34	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		8	0.48	1	0.22	1	0.21	7	0.67	6	0.61	5	0.64
Rubinstein 1952		5	0.50	5	0.05	9	0.19	5	0.69	20	0.48	10	0.58
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.52	3	0.15	3	0.25	3	0.72	17	0.46	9	0.58
Rummel 1943		42	0.33	60	0.00	34	0.06	48	0.06	34	0.07	47	0.06
Shebanova 2002		39	0.34	25	0.00	43	0.06	46	0.06	56	0.04	52	0.05
Smith 1975		30	0.37	38	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.15	45	0.05	36	0.09
Szpilman 1948		22	0.39	26	0.00	37	0.06	50	0.06	30	0.19	33	0.11
Uninsky 1971		33	0.36	42	0.00	32	0.08	29	0.15	31	0.15	27	0.15
Wasowski 1980		38	0.34	37	0.00	41	0.07	35	0.07	45	0.05	44	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		53	0.26	21	0.00	52	0.06	49	0.06	49	0.05	51	0.05
Random 1		65	-0.07	58	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	64	0.02	64	0.02
Random 2		64	-0.07	45	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	57	0.03	65	0.02
Random 3		63	0.05	64	0.00	63	0.03	62	0.03	9	0.35	35	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).