Smith 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		28	0.69	4	0.07	5	0.16	8	0.50	4	0.63	1	0.56
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.71	23	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.25	32	0.14	24	0.19
Beliavsky 2004		57	0.60	59	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	42	0.07	55	0.06
BenOr 1989		4	0.73	19	0.01	11	0.12	12	0.43	32	0.13	21	0.24
Biret 1990		53	0.63	45	0.00	51	0.09	33	0.09	24	0.23	36	0.14
Blet 2003		48	0.64	30	0.00	50	0.06	40	0.06	54	0.04	62	0.05
Block 1995		58	0.60	61	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.04	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.62	28	0.00	60	0.05	41	0.05	39	0.09	51	0.07
Chiu 1999		47	0.65	49	0.00	42	0.05	48	0.05	37	0.07	53	0.06
Clidat 1994		9	0.72	38	0.00	13	0.14	7	0.50	9	0.42	7	0.46
Cohen 1997		62	0.42	35	0.00	62	0.06	39	0.06	37	0.07	56	0.06
Coop 1987		6	0.73	2	0.21	3	0.33	3	0.60	32	0.23	13	0.37
Cortot 1951		59	0.57	46	0.00	61	0.06	37	0.06	10	0.52	27	0.18
Czerny 1949		8	0.73	6	0.02	9	0.15	11	0.45	27	0.29	15	0.36
Czerny 1949b		16	0.70	40	0.00	17	0.11	19	0.30	33	0.11	26	0.18
Ezaki 2006		24	0.69	47	0.00	40	0.05	45	0.05	54	0.06	58	0.05
Falvay 1989		29	0.69	14	0.01	34	0.07	35	0.07	39	0.09	49	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.55	60	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	29	0.23	47	0.10
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.70	39	0.00	20	0.11	16	0.33	24	0.40	16	0.36
Fliere 1977		7	0.73	24	0.00	7	0.14	5	0.53	24	0.36	8	0.44
Fou 1978		30	0.69	55	0.00	43	0.04	56	0.04	50	0.06	60	0.05
Francois 1956		22	0.69	11	0.01	45	0.05	42	0.05	10	0.50	30	0.16
Hatto 1997		50	0.64	51	0.00	36	0.05	46	0.05	15	0.40	32	0.14
Horowitz 1971		43	0.66	41	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	20	0.41	35	0.14
Horowitz 1985		56	0.60	29	0.00	56	0.03	61	0.03	10	0.52	40	0.12
Indjic 2001		51	0.64	50	0.00	37	0.05	54	0.05	15	0.40	33	0.14
Kapell 1951		33	0.68	62	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.14	32	0.20	28	0.17
Kiepura 1999		44	0.66	18	0.01	52	0.04	55	0.04	45	0.06	59	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		5	0.73	15	0.01	8	0.12	4	0.58	24	0.46	4	0.52
Kissin 1993		2	0.74	3	0.21	2	0.29	2	0.70	21	0.41	2	0.54
Kitain 1937		61	0.46	12	0.01	55	0.03	62	0.03	3	0.66	34	0.14
Kushner 1990		37	0.67	63	0.00	29	0.05	27	0.18	35	0.08	43	0.12
Levy 1951		49	0.64	16	0.01	35	0.05	44	0.05	10	0.52	29	0.16
Luisada 1990		23	0.69	32	0.00	28	0.06	32	0.10	40	0.07	50	0.08
Lushtak 2004		20	0.70	27	0.00	21	0.10	17	0.32	28	0.26	19	0.29
Lympany 1968		25	0.69	21	0.01	44	0.05	47	0.05	25	0.28	39	0.12
Magaloff 1977		32	0.68	34	0.00	38	0.04	57	0.04	23	0.30	45	0.11
Magaloff 1977b		38	0.67	25	0.00	39	0.05	53	0.05	26	0.27	44	0.12
Magin 1975		34	0.68	52	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	44	0.07	54	0.06
Milkina 1970		10	0.71	20	0.01	12	0.10	6	0.50	17	0.53	5	0.51
Mohovich 1999		27	0.69	31	0.00	26	0.06	22	0.22	19	0.42	18	0.30
Nadelmann 1956		35	0.68	53	0.00	27	0.06	26	0.19	19	0.26	23	0.22
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.65	26	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.13	31	0.14	37	0.13
Olejniczac 1990		21	0.69	56	0.00	23	0.08	20	0.26	28	0.28	20	0.27
Olejniczak 1991		12	0.71	57	0.00	15	0.11	13	0.40	23	0.28	17	0.33
Osinska 1989		1	0.78	1	0.27	1	0.26	1	0.72	23	0.37	3	0.52
Paderewski 1912		13	0.71	13	0.01	10	0.14	15	0.34	4	0.53	10	0.42
Perahia 1994		41	0.66	8	0.02	18	0.09	25	0.20	4	0.71	12	0.38
Perlemuter 1986		3	0.74	5	0.02	6	0.15	9	0.49	11	0.44	6	0.46
Poblocka 1999		11	0.71	10	0.01	24	0.06	24	0.21	40	0.07	41	0.12
Rangell 2001		40	0.67	42	0.00	48	0.07	36	0.07	45	0.06	57	0.06
Risler 1920		31	0.68	43	0.00	41	0.04	58	0.04	24	0.39	42	0.12
Rosen 1989		54	0.62	64	0.00	59	0.05	50	0.05	54	0.05	63	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.64	36	0.00	30	0.05	31	0.12	14	0.40	22	0.22
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.70	17	0.01	14	0.15	14	0.39	19	0.42	11	0.40
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.67	44	0.00	19	0.11	18	0.31	12	0.45	14	0.37
Rummel 1943		42	0.66	7	0.02	49	0.05	43	0.05	7	0.43	31	0.15
Shebanova 2002		26	0.69	33	0.00	33	0.08	34	0.08	45	0.06	52	0.07
Smith 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Szpilman 1948		19	0.70	58	0.00	25	0.06	28	0.16	32	0.20	25	0.18
Uninsky 1971		36	0.68	37	0.00	16	0.10	23	0.21	37	0.08	38	0.13
Wasowski 1980		46	0.65	22	0.00	53	0.06	38	0.06	28	0.17	46	0.10
Weissenberg 1971		15	0.70	9	0.02	4	0.21	10	0.46	18	0.43	9	0.44
Random 1		65	-0.05	54	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	30	0.12	61	0.05
Random 2		63	0.01	65	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	52	0.04	65	0.03
Random 3		64	-0.02	48	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	11	0.41	48	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).