Rubinstein 1939

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.63	45	0.00	16	0.11	12	0.44	30	0.16	8	0.27
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.63	15	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.37	50	0.06	25	0.15
Beliavsky 2004		32	0.58	11	0.00	15	0.09	17	0.39	32	0.11	13	0.21
BenOr 1989		26	0.60	57	0.00	33	0.07	39	0.07	46	0.06	46	0.06
Biret 1990		8	0.64	30	0.00	9	0.14	15	0.40	22	0.29	6	0.34
Blet 2003		46	0.54	34	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	38	0.06	35	0.08
Block 1995		55	0.50	42	0.00	53	0.04	57	0.04	54	0.04	61	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		42	0.56	51	0.00	50	0.05	47	0.05	53	0.06	48	0.05
Chiu 1999		58	0.48	33	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	58	0.04	58	0.04
Clidat 1994		16	0.62	18	0.00	17	0.13	10	0.46	54	0.05	24	0.15
Cohen 1997		56	0.50	27	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.07	14	0.50	16	0.19
Coop 1987		47	0.54	21	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.08	58	0.04	40	0.06
Cortot 1951		51	0.51	48	0.00	49	0.06	42	0.06	31	0.21	32	0.11
Czerny 1949		23	0.61	12	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.25	47	0.06	30	0.12
Czerny 1949b		24	0.61	7	0.01	28	0.09	27	0.20	32	0.13	19	0.16
Ezaki 2006		50	0.51	16	0.00	56	0.07	40	0.07	61	0.04	47	0.05
Falvay 1989		60	0.45	36	0.00	60	0.03	62	0.03	61	0.04	62	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		62	0.45	61	0.00	62	0.05	49	0.05	57	0.05	53	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		40	0.57	49	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	56	0.06	45	0.06
Fliere 1977		20	0.62	35	0.00	25	0.06	24	0.27	38	0.08	21	0.15
Fou 1978		41	0.56	17	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.06	61	0.05	51	0.05
Francois 1956		30	0.59	26	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.13	54	0.04	38	0.07
Hatto 1997		21	0.62	43	0.00	13	0.10	16	0.40	48	0.06	23	0.15
Horowitz 1971		15	0.63	37	0.00	20	0.10	22	0.33	38	0.06	29	0.14
Horowitz 1985		22	0.61	65	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.22	14	0.46	7	0.32
Indjic 2001		19	0.62	10	0.00	12	0.13	13	0.42	35	0.08	18	0.18
Kapell 1951		52	0.51	38	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.04	59	0.04
Kiepura 1999		36	0.57	23	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	61	0.04	55	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		54	0.50	64	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.05	60	0.04
Kissin 1993		10	0.63	5	0.02	8	0.19	5	0.63	43	0.06	15	0.19
Kitain 1937		57	0.50	20	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.07	11	0.52	17	0.19
Kushner 1990		5	0.68	46	0.00	5	0.22	7	0.59	33	0.10	9	0.24
Levy 1951		44	0.55	52	0.00	42	0.05	51	0.05	36	0.06	49	0.05
Luisada 1990		35	0.58	31	0.00	43	0.05	53	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05
Lushtak 2004		28	0.59	55	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.32	46	0.06	28	0.14
Lympany 1968		27	0.59	6	0.01	21	0.09	21	0.35	51	0.06	26	0.14
Magaloff 1977		29	0.59	58	0.00	41	0.06	45	0.06	41	0.07	42	0.06
Magaloff 1977b		38	0.57	53	0.00	48	0.07	36	0.07	48	0.06	44	0.06
Magin 1975		48	0.54	13	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	51	0.06	50	0.05
Milkina 1970		3	0.73	2	0.09	2	0.37	3	0.77	12	0.58	3	0.67
Mohovich 1999		14	0.63	25	0.00	10	0.15	8	0.51	36	0.08	14	0.20
Nadelmann 1956		6	0.67	19	0.00	7	0.19	11	0.46	31	0.12	11	0.23
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.52	24	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.08	60	0.04	41	0.06
Olejniczac 1990		37	0.57	40	0.00	45	0.07	38	0.07	54	0.05	43	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		33	0.58	32	0.00	40	0.05	48	0.05	41	0.08	39	0.06
Osinska 1989		4	0.69	14	0.00	6	0.26	4	0.64	40	0.08	10	0.23
Paderewski 1912		31	0.58	39	0.00	30	0.09	28	0.19	49	0.05	33	0.10
Perahia 1994		7	0.66	9	0.01	4	0.21	6	0.59	5	0.69	4	0.64
Perlemuter 1986		11	0.63	4	0.02	14	0.10	9	0.48	53	0.05	22	0.15
Poblocka 1999		45	0.54	62	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	60	0.04	56	0.04
Rangell 2001		43	0.55	22	0.00	24	0.07	30	0.15	56	0.05	34	0.09
Risler 1920		53	0.50	28	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	56	0.05	57	0.04
Rosen 1989		59	0.47	41	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.03	65	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1952		2	0.75	3	0.02	3	0.56	2	0.82	8	0.59	2	0.70
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.80	1	0.76	1	0.75	1	0.90	3	0.81	1	0.85
Rummel 1943		34	0.58	44	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.17	25	0.15	20	0.16
Shebanova 2002		17	0.62	8	0.01	19	0.09	18	0.37	52	0.05	27	0.14
Smith 1975		9	0.64	50	0.00	11	0.18	14	0.40	31	0.12	12	0.22
Szpilman 1948		25	0.60	56	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.06	38	0.08	36	0.07
Uninsky 1971		39	0.57	47	0.00	36	0.06	44	0.06	60	0.04	52	0.05
Wasowski 1980		18	0.62	29	0.00	18	0.10	19	0.37	20	0.31	5	0.34
Weissenberg 1971		61	0.45	54	0.00	59	0.03	61	0.03	59	0.04	63	0.03
Random 1		65	-0.03	63	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	21	0.23	37	0.07
Random 2		64	0.02	60	0.00	63	0.02	64	0.02	50	0.05	64	0.03
Random 3		63	0.03	59	0.00	64	0.02	63	0.02	2	0.67	31	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).