Perlemuter 1986

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		34	0.68	28	0.00	27	0.08	18	0.31	6	0.60	12	0.43
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.73	46	0.00	17	0.10	12	0.44	15	0.37	17	0.40
Beliavsky 2004		36	0.68	61	0.00	37	0.06	48	0.06	6	0.52	33	0.18
BenOr 1989		2	0.75	4	0.07	3	0.18	3	0.59	17	0.39	9	0.48
Biret 1990		54	0.62	27	0.00	49	0.07	42	0.07	45	0.06	60	0.06
Blet 2003		45	0.65	16	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.07	20	0.30	41	0.14
Block 1995		52	0.62	37	0.00	46	0.05	59	0.05	35	0.12	52	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.62	15	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	32	0.18	49	0.08
Chiu 1999		50	0.63	21	0.00	38	0.06	45	0.06	35	0.08	53	0.07
Clidat 1994		14	0.72	38	0.00	14	0.14	15	0.38	11	0.41	18	0.39
Cohen 1997		61	0.48	34	0.00	59	0.05	52	0.05	6	0.65	34	0.18
Coop 1987		17	0.71	2	0.18	2	0.23	4	0.56	23	0.38	11	0.46
Cortot 1951		60	0.52	52	0.00	62	0.06	49	0.06	38	0.07	61	0.06
Czerny 1949		13	0.73	50	0.00	22	0.06	28	0.20	30	0.19	31	0.19
Czerny 1949b		27	0.69	63	0.00	41	0.06	47	0.06	42	0.06	58	0.06
Ezaki 2006		19	0.70	60	0.00	26	0.08	22	0.26	32	0.16	28	0.20
Falvay 1989		23	0.70	7	0.02	8	0.16	10	0.44	25	0.33	19	0.38
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.52	45	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	32	0.20	47	0.09
Fiorentino 1962		15	0.71	51	0.00	19	0.10	17	0.34	17	0.50	15	0.41
Fliere 1977		3	0.75	6	0.03	5	0.21	6	0.55	18	0.49	5	0.52
Fou 1978		28	0.69	47	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.15	29	0.22	32	0.18
Francois 1956		8	0.74	19	0.00	23	0.09	24	0.25	2	0.67	16	0.41
Hatto 1997		40	0.67	25	0.00	29	0.11	25	0.23	6	0.62	20	0.38
Horowitz 1971		55	0.61	57	0.00	54	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.04	64	0.04
Horowitz 1985		59	0.52	59	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	37	0.07	56	0.06
Indjic 2001		38	0.67	22	0.00	28	0.07	21	0.26	4	0.64	14	0.41
Kapell 1951		33	0.69	9	0.02	21	0.08	26	0.22	30	0.24	26	0.23
Kiepura 1999		29	0.69	54	0.00	43	0.08	35	0.08	26	0.38	35	0.17
Kilenyi 1937		20	0.70	40	0.00	25	0.08	19	0.29	31	0.21	25	0.25
Kissin 1993		26	0.70	53	0.00	9	0.12	16	0.36	34	0.11	30	0.20
Kitain 1937		62	0.48	36	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	10	0.52	38	0.16
Kushner 1990		9	0.73	8	0.02	7	0.20	8	0.50	13	0.51	7	0.50
Levy 1951		57	0.58	24	0.00	58	0.06	46	0.06	51	0.05	62	0.05
Luisada 1990		35	0.68	39	0.00	45	0.07	37	0.07	33	0.12	48	0.09
Lushtak 2004		21	0.70	33	0.00	16	0.10	13	0.42	16	0.43	13	0.42
Lympany 1968		31	0.69	43	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.08	12	0.49	29	0.20
Magaloff 1977		44	0.65	55	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	31	0.14	51	0.08
Magaloff 1977b		46	0.65	31	0.00	48	0.07	40	0.07	38	0.08	55	0.07
Magin 1975		37	0.67	56	0.00	44	0.08	36	0.08	37	0.09	50	0.08
Milkina 1970		4	0.74	5	0.06	4	0.18	2	0.74	3	0.74	1	0.74
Mohovich 1999		7	0.74	3	0.13	6	0.17	14	0.42	6	0.67	4	0.53
Nadelmann 1956		25	0.70	11	0.01	15	0.11	20	0.28	9	0.41	21	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.62	58	0.00	40	0.07	43	0.07	42	0.07	54	0.07
Olejniczac 1990		11	0.73	26	0.00	12	0.13	9	0.47	14	0.53	8	0.50
Olejniczak 1991		10	0.73	17	0.00	10	0.15	5	0.55	14	0.49	6	0.52
Osinska 1989		1	0.78	1	0.36	1	0.35	1	0.81	19	0.49	2	0.63
Paderewski 1912		16	0.71	42	0.00	24	0.09	27	0.21	6	0.47	22	0.31
Perahia 1994		56	0.59	12	0.01	56	0.04	60	0.04	17	0.47	43	0.14
Perlemuter 1986		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Poblocka 1999		22	0.70	14	0.00	39	0.07	41	0.07	46	0.06	57	0.06
Rangell 2001		30	0.69	29	0.00	33	0.07	39	0.07	21	0.43	37	0.17
Risler 1920		39	0.67	41	0.00	42	0.06	44	0.06	28	0.35	40	0.14
Rosen 1989		47	0.64	32	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	30	0.30	45	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.63	18	0.00	50	0.05	53	0.05	9	0.48	39	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.70	20	0.00	18	0.09	23	0.25	23	0.35	24	0.30
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.67	10	0.01	20	0.08	29	0.20	11	0.45	23	0.30
Rummel 1943		42	0.66	30	0.00	52	0.06	50	0.06	12	0.34	42	0.14
Shebanova 2002		32	0.69	48	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.13	29	0.14	44	0.13
Smith 1975		5	0.74	49	0.00	13	0.12	11	0.44	9	0.49	10	0.46
Szpilman 1948		6	0.74	13	0.01	11	0.13	7	0.53	9	0.61	3	0.57
Uninsky 1971		18	0.70	23	0.00	30	0.09	30	0.17	16	0.31	27	0.23
Wasowski 1980		48	0.63	35	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	22	0.25	46	0.11
Weissenberg 1971		43	0.65	44	0.00	34	0.10	33	0.10	28	0.29	36	0.17
Random 1		64	-0.05	65	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	27	0.18	59	0.06
Random 2		63	0.00	64	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	34	0.06	63	0.04
Random 3		65	-0.07	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	53	0.03	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).