Tanyel, Seta performance comparisons

Mazurka, Op. 24, No. 2

full tempo curve  Tanyel 1992 78.9%   Average   2.5%   Milkina 1970   2.5%   Falvay 1989   2.2%   Vardi 1988   1.8%   Brailowsky 1960   1.4%   Fliere 1977 0.76 Average 0.71 Lushtak 2004 0.70 Brailowsky 1960 0.69 Uninsky 1959 0.67 Biret 1990 0.64 Milkina 1970 0.63 Falvay 1989 0.62 Mohovich 1999 0.59 Osinska 1989 0.59 Magin 1975 0.59 Malcuzynski 1951 0.58 Malcuzynski 1961 0.58 Olejniczak 1990 0.58 Kushner 1990 0.56 Tsujii 2005 0.55 Ezaki 2006 0.55 Nezu 2005

smoothed tempo curve (0.5)  Tanyel 1992 24.0%   Average 14.4%   Osinska 1989   8.7%   Magin 1975   8.1%   Kushner 1990   6.0%   Malcuzynski 1951   5.5%   Malcuzynski 1961   5.2%   Brailowsky 1960   4.1%   BenOr 1989   2.4%   Falvay 1989   1.9%   Groot 1988   1.7%   Fliere 1977   1.6%   Nezu 2005   1.5%   Olejniczak 1990   1.3%   Milkina 1970   1.3%   Uninsky 1959   1.2%   Csalog 1996   1.1%   Francois 1956   1.0%   Clidat 1994   1.0%   Rubinstein 1939 0.55 Kushner 1990

desmoothed tempo curve (0.5)  Tanyel 1992 77.8%   Average   2.6%   Biret 1990   2.1%   Vardi 1988   1.7%   Magin 1975   1.5%   Lushtak 2004   1.4%   Fliere 1977   1.3%   Sztompka 1959   1.1%   Milkina 1970 0.77 Uninsky 1959 0.75 Average 0.75 Lushtak 2004 0.71 Milkina 1970 0.68 Brailowsky 1960 0.68 Biret 1990 0.66 Falvay 1989 0.60 Mohovich 1999 0.59 Tsujii 2005 0.58 Vardi 1988 0.55 Malcuzynski 1951 0.55 Fliere 1977 0.55 Groot 1988

global beat dynamics  Tanyel 1992 37.3%   Tsujii 2005 26.5%   Meguri 1997   7.5%   Lilamand 2001   6.6%   Rosen 1989   4.9%   Richter 1960   3.1%   Average   2.8%   Nezu 2005   1.9%   Biret 1990   1.0%   Falvay 1989 0.68 Tsujii 2005 0.67 Lilamand 2001 0.67 Meguri 1997 0.67 Rangell 2001 0.65 Rosen 1989 0.55 Lushtak 2004

smoothed beat dynamics  Tanyel 1992 32.6%   Meguri 1997 21.1%   Tsujii 2005   8.0%   Lushtak 2004   7.6%   Olejniczak 1990   6.0%   Average   2.5%   Rangell 2001   2.0%   Richter 1960   1.6%   Luisada 1990   1.4%   Hatto 1997   1.2%   Rudanovskaya 2007 0.64 Lushtak 2004 0.63 Meguri 1997 0.55 Olejniczak 1990

desmoothed beat dynamics  Tanyel 1992 20.6%   Rosen 1989 14.7%   Zimerman 1975 12.8%   Lilamand 2001 11.9%   Tsujii 2005 10.7%   Richter 1960   6.5%   Ashkenazy 1981   5.0%   Rangell 2001   3.4%   Biret 1990   2.8%   Wasowski 1980   2.5%   Nezu 2005   2.3%   Osinska 1989   1.2%   Mohovich 1999 0.78 Rosen 1989 0.75 Zimerman 1975 0.73 Lilamand 2001 0.72 Richter 1960 0.70 Rangell 2001 0.66 Tsujii 2005 0.63 Osinska 1989 0.63 Meguri 1997 0.58 Ashkenazy 1981

joint tempo / global dynamics  Tanyel 1992 75.5%   Average   8.0%   Tsujii 2005   2.8%   Rosen 1989   2.6%   Lushtak 2004   2.0%   Falvay 1989   1.5%   Osinska 1989 0.75 Lushtak 2004 0.70 Tsujii 2005 0.67 Biret 1990 0.64 Rosen 1989 0.63 Rangell 2001 0.61 Olejniczak 1990 0.55 Fiorentino 1962 0.55 BenOr 1989

smoothed joint features  Tanyel 1992 30.6%   Average 19.2%   Osinska 1989   9.9%   Meguri 1997   6.5%   Lushtak 2004   4.7%   Tsujii 2005   4.6%   Olejniczak 1990   4.5%   Lilamand 2001   3.0%   Falvay 1989   1.8%   Mohovich 1999   1.7%   Cohen 1997   1.4%   Nezu 2005   1.2%   Magin 1975   1.1%   Magaloff 1977   1.0%   BenOr 1989 0.68 Lushtak 2004 0.57 Rangell 2001

desmoothed joint features  Tanyel 1992 73.2%   Average   7.2%   Rosen 1989   4.5%   Biret 1990   2.6%   Tsujii 2005   1.5%   Richter 1960   1.5%   Fiorentino 1962   1.2%   Lushtak 2004   1.0%   Falvay 1989 0.75 Rosen 1989 0.74 Tsujii 2005 0.73 Zimerman 1975 0.71 Uninsky 1959 0.71 Biret 1990 0.67 Osinska 1989 0.66 Richter 1960 0.61 Falvay 1989 0.60 Ashkenazy 1981 0.58 Rangell 2001 0.56 Fiorentino 1962 0.55 Lushtak 2004