Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	16	0.59	76	0.00	11	0.08	25	0.39	27	0.38	29	0.38
Anderszewski 2003	70	0.45	50	0.00	52	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.04	82	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981	24	0.57	77	0.00	20	0.10	20	0.45	21	0.42	25	0.43
Bacha 2000	69	0.46	60	0.00	70	0.09	46	0.09	22	0.39	46	0.19
Badura 1965	59	0.49	39	0.00	49	0.07	50	0.07	14	0.43	50	0.17
Barbosa 1983	29	0.56	20	0.00	35	0.07	31	0.28	8	0.57	27	0.40
Biret 1990	23	0.57	61	0.00	17	0.09	11	0.49	5	0.60	9	0.54
Blet 2003	46	0.52	62	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	28	0.27	59	0.12
Block 1995	64	0.47	23	0.00	68	0.05	59	0.05	36	0.19	66	0.10
Blumental 1952	60	0.48	6	0.00	64	0.04	76	0.04	37	0.14	70	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969	13	0.60	31	0.00	9	0.09	6	0.58	7	0.67	6	0.62
Brailowsky 1960	61	0.48	12	0.00	67	0.05	62	0.05	28	0.37	53	0.14
Bunin 1987	45	0.52	51	0.00	56	0.04	67	0.04	21	0.39	60	0.12
Bunin 1987b	47	0.51	40	0.00	57	0.07	48	0.07	20	0.41	49	0.17
Chiu 1999	21	0.58	15	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.42	6	0.65	10	0.52
Cohen 1997	87	0.31	41	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	62	0.04	87	0.03
Cortot 1951	76	0.39	63	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	78	0.03	88	0.03
Csalog 1996	49	0.51	7	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	6	0.64	41	0.21
Czerny 1949	42	0.52	52	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.14	32	0.28	43	0.20
Czerny 1990	27	0.56	64	0.00	30	0.08	39	0.22	37	0.19	44	0.20
Duchoud 2007	62	0.47	42	0.00	69	0.06	54	0.06	35	0.20	61	0.11
Ezaki 2006	7	0.61	8	0.00	14	0.09	18	0.45	15	0.47	22	0.46
Falvay 1989	9	0.61	24	0.00	27	0.13	22	0.42	10	0.58	15	0.49
Farrell 1958	57	0.49	78	0.00	60	0.06	53	0.06	27	0.28	56	0.13
Ferenczy 1958	74	0.42	25	0.00	75	0.04	77	0.04	54	0.04	83	0.04
Fliere 1977	5	0.62	65	0.00	8	0.10	7	0.56	26	0.44	13	0.50
Fou 1978	10	0.61	53	0.00	16	0.09	10	0.52	13	0.47	16	0.49
Francois 1956	40	0.53	79	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.20	14	0.52	33	0.32
Friedman 1923	79	0.37	80	0.00	79	0.05	60	0.05	39	0.15	68	0.09
Friedman 1923b	77	0.38	26	0.00	74	0.04	78	0.04	34	0.21	67	0.09
Friedman 1930	72	0.43	43	0.00	63	0.04	81	0.04	32	0.25	65	0.10
Garcia 2007	75	0.39	66	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	23	0.29	62	0.11
Garcia 2007b	84	0.35	16	0.00	77	0.04	79	0.04	39	0.11	72	0.07
Gierzod 1998	14	0.60	10	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.46	26	0.42	24	0.44
Gornostaeva 1994	55	0.49	17	0.00	53	0.06	55	0.06	37	0.19	63	0.11
Groot 1988	31	0.55	81	0.00	28	0.12	26	0.37	14	0.46	26	0.41
Harasiewicz 1955	8	0.61	54	0.00	3	0.31	3	0.67	3	0.60	5	0.63
Hatto 1993	58	0.49	67	0.00	40	0.05	43	0.19	25	0.21	45	0.20
Hatto 1997	53	0.50	82	0.00	33	0.06	36	0.23	34	0.18	42	0.20
Horowitz 1949	30	0.56	27	0.00	6	0.09	28	0.36	8	0.63	21	0.48
Indjic 1988	51	0.50	32	0.00	31	0.07	33	0.27	20	0.33	35	0.30
Kapell 1951	28	0.56	44	0.00	34	0.06	32	0.28	37	0.21	38	0.24
Kissin 1993	3	0.64	55	0.00	4	0.17	4	0.65	6	0.67	3	0.66
Kushner 1989	17	0.59	68	0.00	29	0.09	27	0.37	30	0.31	30	0.34
Luisada 1991	22	0.58	56	0.00	7	0.09	21	0.43	15	0.53	19	0.48
Lushtak 2004	6	0.61	45	0.00	5	0.17	5	0.60	2	0.67	4	0.63
Malcuzynski 1961	38	0.54	4	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.30	18	0.35	32	0.32
Magaloff 1978	44	0.52	21	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	26	0.28	54	0.14
Magin 1975	41	0.53	33	0.00	21	0.12	29	0.34	17	0.44	28	0.39
Michalowski 1933	86	0.34	28	0.00	76	0.04	80	0.04	49	0.07	76	0.05
Milkina 1970	26	0.57	22	0.00	12	0.08	14	0.48	13	0.51	17	0.49
Mohovich 1999	4	0.62	34	0.00	10	0.08	9	0.53	10	0.64	7	0.58
Moravec 1969	66	0.47	83	0.00	72	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.04	79	0.04
Morozova 2008	37	0.54	13	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.21	28	0.27	39	0.24
Neighaus 1950	15	0.59	46	0.00	13	0.08	8	0.54	13	0.50	11	0.52
Niedzielski 1931	68	0.47	69	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	12	0.49	51	0.16
Ohlsson 1999	25	0.57	47	0.00	18	0.08	13	0.48	16	0.44	23	0.46
Osinska 1989	18	0.58	14	0.00	23	0.09	16	0.46	14	0.50	20	0.48
Pachmann 1927	52	0.50	35	0.00	51	0.05	65	0.05	5	0.64	48	0.18
Paderewski 1930	80	0.37	84	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Perlemuter 1992	33	0.55	48	0.00	39	0.05	40	0.22	12	0.47	31	0.32
Pierdomenico 2008	65	0.47	85	0.00	66	0.06	51	0.06	20	0.36	52	0.15
Poblocka 1999	34	0.55	70	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.16	39	0.21	47	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932	73	0.42	36	0.00	73	0.05	64	0.05	50	0.06	75	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923	43	0.52	57	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.22	23	0.35	36	0.28
Rangell 2001	67	0.47	9	0.00	62	0.05	66	0.05	23	0.32	57	0.13
Richter 1976	50	0.51	71	0.00	50	0.05	61	0.05	24	0.39	55	0.14
Rosen 1989	36	0.54	29	0.00	42	0.09	35	0.23	32	0.23	40	0.23
Rosenthal 1930	81	0.36	86	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	66	0.05	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931	85	0.34	87	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	50	0.05	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b	82	0.36	72	0.00	84	0.04	69	0.04	43	0.13	71	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c	78	0.37	3	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	51	0.04	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d	83	0.36	73	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	47	0.07	78	0.05
Rossi 2007	88	0.30	88	0.00	88	0.04	73	0.04	54	0.05	80	0.04
Rubinstein 1939	71	0.45	74	0.00	71	0.04	68	0.04	19	0.39	58	0.12
Rubinstein 1952	20	0.58	89	0.00	26	0.10	24	0.40	11	0.59	18	0.49
Rubinstein 1966	11	0.61	58	0.00	24	0.09	15	0.47	11	0.62	8	0.54
Schilhawsky 1960	19	0.58	37	0.00	15	0.09	19	0.45	9	0.57	12	0.51
Shebanova 2002	12	0.60	30	0.00	22	0.11	12	0.49	15	0.51	14	0.50
Smith 1975	48	0.51	90	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.07	73	0.06
Sokolov 2002	35	0.54	18	0.00	41	0.07	34	0.23	28	0.32	37	0.27
Sztompka 1959	63	0.47	59	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.08	74	0.06
Tomsic 1995	32	0.55	91	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.23	16	0.41	34	0.31
Uninsky 1932	54	0.49	11	0.00	61	0.04	71	0.04	55	0.06	77	0.05
Uninsky 1971	39	0.53	5	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	39	0.16	64	0.10
Wasowski 1980	56	0.49	19	0.00	55	0.04	75	0.04	42	0.14	69	0.07
Zak 1937	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Zak 1951	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Average	2	0.75	2	0.00	2	0.76	2	0.88	9	0.53	2	0.68
Random 1	89	-0.05	38	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	40	0.11	86	0.03
Random 2	91	-0.07	49	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	73	0.02	91	0.01
Random 3	90	-0.06	75	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	73	0.03	90	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).