Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	6	0.66	2	0.03	7	0.21	4	0.56	6	0.58	5	0.57
Anderszewski 2003	44	0.52	68	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.13	23	0.39	38	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981	8	0.65	9	0.01	10	0.15	5	0.56	12	0.54	9	0.55
Bacha 2000	78	0.39	86	0.00	79	0.05	67	0.05	83	0.03	76	0.04
Badura 1965	48	0.51	43	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	19	0.40	47	0.15
Barbosa 1983	74	0.45	28	0.00	61	0.06	57	0.06	60	0.05	74	0.05
Biret 1990	47	0.51	65	0.00	60	0.07	49	0.07	60	0.05	67	0.06
Blet 2003	35	0.56	11	0.01	41	0.06	36	0.16	9	0.49	34	0.28
Block 1995	62	0.49	18	0.00	30	0.07	34	0.17	20	0.37	35	0.25
Blumental 1952	51	0.51	5	0.03	12	0.11	31	0.26	7	0.44	26	0.34
Boshniakovich 1969	31	0.56	88	0.00	46	0.04	75	0.04	41	0.17	60	0.08
Brailowsky 1960	81	0.37	64	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	73	0.04	82	0.03
Bunin 1987	55	0.50	40	0.00	58	0.07	48	0.07	24	0.34	48	0.15
Bunin 1987b	59	0.50	69	0.00	59	0.07	50	0.07	27	0.32	46	0.15
Chiu 1999	77	0.44	54	0.00	74	0.04	80	0.04	60	0.04	77	0.04
Cohen 1997	87	0.29	46	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.03
Cortot 1951	17	0.60	48	0.00	11	0.12	14	0.45	3	0.73	6	0.57
Csalog 1996	84	0.33	74	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	87	0.03	86	0.03
Czerny 1949	7	0.66	53	0.00	6	0.16	6	0.55	11	0.60	4	0.57
Czerny 1990	2	0.72	6	0.02	2	0.33	2	0.74	4	0.74	1	0.74
Duchoud 2007	50	0.51	70	0.00	52	0.05	63	0.05	22	0.40	50	0.14
Ezaki 2006	25	0.58	55	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.11	55	0.06	57	0.08
Falvay 1989	75	0.45	27	0.00	78	0.05	70	0.05	66	0.05	69	0.05
Farrell 1958	36	0.56	50	0.00	43	0.05	37	0.15	6	0.51	32	0.28
Ferenczy 1958	46	0.52	56	0.00	36	0.05	43	0.10	10	0.46	41	0.21
Fliere 1977	4	0.67	19	0.00	13	0.12	12	0.49	32	0.39	16	0.44
Fou 1978	41	0.53	35	0.00	51	0.05	71	0.05	61	0.05	70	0.05
Francois 1956	37	0.55	51	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.13	16	0.50	36	0.25
Friedman 1923	60	0.50	89	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.14	7	0.59	31	0.29
Friedman 1923b	58	0.50	31	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.19	7	0.61	27	0.34
Friedman 1930	40	0.53	26	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.26	9	0.53	24	0.37
Garcia 2007	73	0.46	76	0.00	54	0.06	54	0.06	7	0.61	42	0.19
Garcia 2007b	72	0.46	90	0.00	42	0.05	45	0.09	7	0.56	39	0.22
Gierzod 1998	15	0.61	60	0.00	14	0.10	13	0.47	19	0.48	15	0.47
Gornostaeva 1994	32	0.56	39	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.13	38	0.18	49	0.15
Groot 1988	43	0.52	7	0.02	34	0.06	35	0.17	49	0.06	54	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955	26	0.58	52	0.00	18	0.08	17	0.40	30	0.28	29	0.33
Hatto 1993	71	0.46	61	0.00	57	0.09	46	0.09	59	0.05	63	0.07
Hatto 1997	65	0.48	82	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	37	0.16	56	0.09
Horowitz 1949	69	0.47	36	0.00	75	0.05	69	0.05	47	0.06	72	0.05
Indjic 1988	67	0.47	83	0.00	56	0.06	56	0.06	68	0.05	73	0.05
Kapell 1951	10	0.64	3	0.03	4	0.21	9	0.53	5	0.54	11	0.53
Kissin 1993	20	0.60	21	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.28	35	0.20	37	0.24
Kushner 1989	11	0.63	12	0.01	22	0.09	21	0.37	19	0.44	21	0.40
Luisada 1991	45	0.52	78	0.00	62	0.05	68	0.05	58	0.05	68	0.05
Lushtak 2004	39	0.54	66	0.00	47	0.05	64	0.05	46	0.07	65	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961	22	0.59	13	0.01	28	0.09	27	0.28	24	0.32	30	0.30
Magaloff 1978	53	0.51	30	0.00	67	0.04	76	0.04	72	0.04	78	0.04
Magin 1975	56	0.50	45	0.00	66	0.04	79	0.04	63	0.04	79	0.04
Michalowski 1933	28	0.57	62	0.00	15	0.13	15	0.45	3	0.63	12	0.53
Milkina 1970	52	0.51	49	0.00	64	0.05	72	0.05	56	0.06	71	0.05
Mohovich 1999	42	0.53	14	0.01	53	0.06	59	0.06	49	0.07	66	0.06
Moravec 1969	61	0.49	44	0.00	63	0.05	65	0.05	33	0.21	53	0.10
Morozova 2008	16	0.61	8	0.01	17	0.09	16	0.43	12	0.44	17	0.43
Neighaus 1950	5	0.67	24	0.00	9	0.18	7	0.54	4	0.59	7	0.56
Niedzielski 1931	57	0.50	10	0.01	50	0.05	66	0.05	13	0.49	44	0.16
Ohlsson 1999	18	0.60	22	0.00	27	0.08	28	0.27	31	0.30	33	0.28
Osinska 1989	27	0.58	84	0.00	38	0.05	32	0.20	37	0.22	40	0.21
Pachmann 1927	82	0.36	29	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	66	0.04	84	0.03
Paderewski 1930	30	0.57	20	0.00	20	0.07	25	0.31	3	0.57	18	0.42
Perlemuter 1992	21	0.60	47	0.00	24	0.08	19	0.38	6	0.58	14	0.47
Pierdomenico 2008	70	0.46	63	0.00	73	0.04	78	0.04	39	0.17	58	0.08
Poblocka 1999	3	0.67	71	0.00	5	0.14	8	0.53	5	0.53	10	0.53
Rabcewiczowa 1932	14	0.61	15	0.01	16	0.16	10	0.53	4	0.58	8	0.55
Rachmaninoff 1923	38	0.54	34	0.00	29	0.09	22	0.31	18	0.44	23	0.37
Rangell 2001	68	0.47	38	0.00	72	0.04	77	0.04	40	0.14	62	0.07
Richter 1976	34	0.56	32	0.00	49	0.06	55	0.06	20	0.41	45	0.16
Rosen 1989	29	0.57	73	0.00	45	0.05	44	0.09	42	0.13	52	0.11
Rosenthal 1930	64	0.48	57	0.00	70	0.06	53	0.06	20	0.47	43	0.17
Rosenthal 1931	85	0.31	85	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	64	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b	86	0.29	81	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	82	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c	76	0.44	75	0.00	76	0.06	51	0.06	41	0.18	55	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d	88	0.28	79	0.00	88	0.04	81	0.04	79	0.03	88	0.03
Rossi 2007	80	0.38	58	0.00	77	0.06	60	0.06	26	0.27	51	0.13
Rubinstein 1939	83	0.34	25	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.04	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1952	79	0.39	33	0.00	80	0.06	58	0.06	77	0.04	75	0.05
Rubinstein 1966	49	0.51	67	0.00	69	0.06	61	0.06	52	0.08	61	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960	33	0.56	59	0.00	32	0.07	29	0.26	28	0.41	28	0.33
Shebanova 2002	13	0.62	37	0.00	19	0.06	18	0.39	29	0.38	22	0.38
Smith 1975	23	0.59	80	0.00	23	0.10	20	0.37	14	0.46	19	0.41
Sokolov 2002	19	0.60	16	0.00	25	0.09	23	0.31	18	0.42	25	0.36
Sztompka 1959	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tomsic 1995	54	0.50	17	0.00	68	0.05	73	0.05	42	0.12	59	0.08
Uninsky 1932	9	0.65	4	0.03	3	0.19	3	0.58	3	0.69	3	0.63
Uninsky 1971	12	0.62	42	0.00	8	0.22	11	0.51	8	0.53	13	0.52
Wasowski 1980	24	0.59	23	0.00	21	0.08	24	0.31	6	0.52	20	0.40
Zak 1937	63	0.48	41	0.00	65	0.04	74	0.04	74	0.04	80	0.04
Zak 1951	66	0.47	72	0.00	71	0.08	47	0.08	70	0.04	64	0.06
Average	1	0.77	1	0.68	1	0.68	1	0.87	21	0.45	2	0.63
Random 1	91	-0.06	77	0.00	89	0.01	90	0.01	34	0.17	81	0.04
Random 2	90	-0.04	91	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	70	0.02	91	0.01
Random 3	89	-0.02	87	0.00	90	0.01	89	0.01	53	0.04	89	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).