Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	14	0.62	78	0.00	24	0.13	19	0.48	16	0.50	19	0.49
Anderszewski 2003	70	0.45	82	0.00	70	0.03	84	0.03	65	0.04	86	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981	6	0.66	4	0.03	6	0.24	6	0.69	2	0.70	5	0.69
Bacha 2000	47	0.53	83	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	7	0.54	48	0.16
Badura 1965	65	0.49	75	0.00	52	0.06	53	0.06	18	0.40	50	0.15
Barbosa 1983	60	0.50	46	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.10	25	0.37	42	0.19
Biret 1990	34	0.55	59	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.17	36	0.18	46	0.17
Blet 2003	51	0.52	57	0.00	68	0.07	48	0.07	41	0.12	60	0.09
Block 1995	44	0.54	21	0.00	48	0.05	69	0.05	17	0.42	53	0.14
Blumental 1952	59	0.50	66	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.10	15	0.34	43	0.18
Boshniakovich 1969	15	0.62	58	0.00	27	0.09	28	0.39	16	0.47	28	0.43
Brailowsky 1960	64	0.49	55	0.00	71	0.04	81	0.04	40	0.22	59	0.09
Bunin 1987	75	0.42	15	0.01	76	0.04	72	0.04	62	0.05	79	0.04
Bunin 1987b	76	0.41	50	0.00	77	0.04	73	0.04	59	0.05	74	0.04
Chiu 1999	16	0.61	7	0.01	12	0.15	7	0.60	2	0.77	6	0.68
Cohen 1997	80	0.40	81	0.00	79	0.05	64	0.05	31	0.25	58	0.11
Cortot 1951	68	0.46	37	0.00	78	0.04	78	0.04	38	0.16	63	0.08
Csalog 1996	45	0.54	35	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.27	7	0.63	29	0.41
Czerny 1949	67	0.47	70	0.00	62	0.04	80	0.04	58	0.05	77	0.04
Czerny 1990	10	0.64	11	0.01	16	0.08	13	0.53	20	0.40	24	0.46
Duchoud 2007	41	0.54	31	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.29	4	0.63	27	0.43
Ezaki 2006	37	0.55	39	0.00	56	0.07	47	0.07	65	0.04	67	0.05
Falvay 1989	23	0.59	60	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.19	30	0.34	38	0.25
Farrell 1958	63	0.49	76	0.00	72	0.04	82	0.04	54	0.06	68	0.05
Ferenczy 1958	77	0.41	87	0.00	82	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.04	76	0.04
Fliere 1977	4	0.70	5	0.02	4	0.29	4	0.72	2	0.70	2	0.71
Fou 1978	22	0.60	43	0.00	22	0.08	17	0.48	15	0.45	22	0.46
Francois 1956	61	0.49	63	0.00	64	0.03	86	0.03	49	0.05	83	0.04
Friedman 1923	84	0.35	22	0.00	81	0.05	68	0.05	73	0.04	84	0.04
Friedman 1923b	83	0.35	42	0.00	80	0.05	60	0.05	46	0.09	64	0.07
Friedman 1930	74	0.42	40	0.00	74	0.06	50	0.06	72	0.04	70	0.05
Garcia 2007	73	0.44	67	0.00	69	0.06	52	0.06	12	0.49	45	0.17
Garcia 2007b	72	0.44	56	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	6	0.56	47	0.17
Gierzod 1998	7	0.65	20	0.00	7	0.17	8	0.59	2	0.60	8	0.59
Gornostaeva 1994	48	0.53	68	0.00	65	0.04	76	0.04	56	0.04	80	0.04
Groot 1988	26	0.58	61	0.00	31	0.11	30	0.34	27	0.37	32	0.35
Harasiewicz 1955	54	0.51	41	0.00	46	0.04	77	0.04	65	0.04	81	0.04
Hatto 1993	42	0.54	12	0.01	9	0.15	12	0.55	8	0.58	10	0.56
Hatto 1997	58	0.50	65	0.00	20	0.07	31	0.32	26	0.28	35	0.30
Horowitz 1949	57	0.50	29	0.00	59	0.05	59	0.05	15	0.55	44	0.17
Indjic 1988	39	0.54	6	0.01	10	0.21	14	0.53	8	0.58	11	0.55
Kapell 1951	38	0.55	38	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	46	0.06	69	0.05
Kissin 1993	2	0.74	2	0.27	2	0.50	2	0.82	2	0.83	1	0.82
Kushner 1989	3	0.71	19	0.00	5	0.15	3	0.72	2	0.71	3	0.71
Luisada 1991	21	0.60	28	0.00	11	0.20	16	0.50	13	0.53	15	0.51
Lushtak 2004	19	0.60	33	0.00	26	0.09	24	0.46	13	0.51	20	0.48
Malcuzynski 1961	30	0.57	16	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.12	48	0.06	61	0.08
Magaloff 1978	27	0.58	10	0.01	34	0.08	34	0.24	27	0.27	37	0.25
Magin 1975	31	0.57	53	0.00	21	0.08	20	0.48	11	0.51	18	0.49
Michalowski 1933	71	0.45	72	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	21	0.37	52	0.14
Milkina 1970	17	0.61	52	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.47	18	0.44	25	0.45
Mohovich 1999	32	0.57	34	0.00	47	0.04	74	0.04	41	0.16	62	0.08
Moravec 1969	55	0.51	45	0.00	60	0.05	71	0.05	20	0.36	54	0.13
Morozova 2008	28	0.58	8	0.01	14	0.09	23	0.46	11	0.45	26	0.45
Neighaus 1950	9	0.64	36	0.00	17	0.07	10	0.56	8	0.54	12	0.55
Niedzielski 1931	56	0.50	18	0.00	35	0.08	35	0.20	8	0.55	33	0.33
Ohlsson 1999	5	0.68	3	0.07	3	0.23	5	0.71	2	0.71	4	0.71
Osinska 1989	20	0.60	44	0.00	29	0.10	26	0.42	29	0.39	30	0.40
Pachmann 1927	62	0.49	24	0.00	75	0.05	61	0.05	18	0.46	49	0.15
Paderewski 1930	66	0.47	79	0.00	55	0.07	49	0.07	24	0.28	51	0.14
Perlemuter 1992	35	0.55	48	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.12	14	0.46	39	0.23
Pierdomenico 2008	43	0.54	62	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.16	3	0.63	34	0.32
Poblocka 1999	8	0.65	26	0.00	8	0.16	9	0.56	6	0.53	13	0.54
Rabcewiczowa 1932	69	0.46	88	0.00	73	0.05	65	0.05	62	0.04	73	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923	79	0.41	84	0.00	63	0.05	58	0.05	82	0.03	71	0.04
Rangell 2001	36	0.55	13	0.01	36	0.07	37	0.18	15	0.43	36	0.28
Richter 1976	40	0.54	25	0.00	37	0.06	43	0.12	17	0.43	40	0.23
Rosen 1989	11	0.63	47	0.00	18	0.11	18	0.48	11	0.55	16	0.51
Rosenthal 1930	82	0.36	85	0.00	84	0.04	79	0.04	72	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931	87	0.30	89	0.00	88	0.04	83	0.04	60	0.04	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b	86	0.31	80	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	77	0.03	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c	81	0.38	71	0.00	83	0.05	70	0.05	79	0.03	82	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d	85	0.31	91	0.00	87	0.03	88	0.03	76	0.03	88	0.03
Rossi 2007	88	0.29	54	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1939	78	0.41	77	0.00	61	0.04	75	0.04	21	0.34	56	0.12
Rubinstein 1952	25	0.59	27	0.00	30	0.14	22	0.47	9	0.60	14	0.53
Rubinstein 1966	24	0.59	23	0.00	25	0.09	25	0.42	19	0.50	23	0.46
Schilhawsky 1960	50	0.52	14	0.01	42	0.04	40	0.15	31	0.33	41	0.22
Shebanova 2002	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975	53	0.51	86	0.00	66	0.05	57	0.05	76	0.03	72	0.04
Sokolov 2002	52	0.52	51	0.00	67	0.07	46	0.07	54	0.05	65	0.06
Sztompka 1959	13	0.62	30	0.00	15	0.06	29	0.38	18	0.39	31	0.38
Tomsic 1995	33	0.56	17	0.00	49	0.05	66	0.05	21	0.33	55	0.13
Uninsky 1932	49	0.53	73	0.00	50	0.05	67	0.05	29	0.29	57	0.12
Uninsky 1971	46	0.54	32	0.00	54	0.06	51	0.06	53	0.06	66	0.06
Wasowski 1980	29	0.58	9	0.01	28	0.11	27	0.40	9	0.52	21	0.46
Zak 1937	12	0.63	49	0.00	13	0.14	11	0.55	7	0.62	9	0.58
Zak 1951	18	0.60	64	0.00	19	0.08	15	0.51	12	0.49	17	0.50
Average	1	0.77	1	0.45	1	0.45	1	0.85	20	0.46	7	0.63
Random 1	90	-0.04	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	35	0.16	78	0.04
Random 2	91	-0.05	69	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	69	0.02	91	0.01
Random 3	89	-0.02	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	62	0.03	90	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).