Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	12	0.58	67	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.44	37	0.28	28	0.35
Anderszewski 2003	36	0.52	27	0.00	25	0.07	36	0.28	28	0.29	33	0.28
Ashkenazy 1981	27	0.53	25	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.48	28	0.38	21	0.43
Bacha 2000	75	0.37	42	0.00	71	0.04	79	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.04
Badura 1965	47	0.49	37	0.00	41	0.07	44	0.15	24	0.37	35	0.24
Barbosa 1983	53	0.47	34	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	40	0.19	54	0.10
Biret 1990	52	0.48	20	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.15	46	0.09	49	0.12
Blet 2003	39	0.52	40	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	27	0.28	44	0.13
Block 1995	71	0.42	72	0.00	39	0.08	45	0.14	46	0.06	58	0.09
Blumental 1952	63	0.44	23	0.00	48	0.04	64	0.04	40	0.11	62	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969	19	0.56	15	0.01	32	0.12	24	0.46	23	0.36	24	0.41
Brailowsky 1960	73	0.39	50	0.00	78	0.04	78	0.04	63	0.05	73	0.04
Bunin 1987	10	0.58	5	0.04	6	0.15	10	0.54	4	0.59	6	0.56
Bunin 1987b	13	0.58	17	0.01	7	0.16	11	0.54	4	0.58	4	0.56
Chiu 1999	67	0.43	62	0.00	57	0.06	47	0.06	56	0.05	64	0.05
Cohen 1997	88	0.23	55	0.00	88	0.04	72	0.04	80	0.03	88	0.03
Cortot 1951	31	0.53	85	0.00	42	0.08	33	0.30	6	0.62	22	0.43
Csalog 1996	76	0.37	64	0.00	75	0.04	77	0.04	59	0.05	79	0.04
Czerny 1949	8	0.61	74	0.00	14	0.08	16	0.51	21	0.45	16	0.48
Czerny 1990	21	0.56	65	0.00	34	0.10	32	0.33	49	0.07	42	0.15
Duchoud 2007	65	0.44	71	0.00	55	0.07	46	0.07	32	0.26	45	0.13
Ezaki 2006	23	0.55	79	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.23	50	0.06	46	0.12
Falvay 1989	82	0.35	51	0.00	85	0.02	89	0.02	70	0.04	84	0.03
Farrell 1958	69	0.42	46	0.00	66	0.05	60	0.05	51	0.06	66	0.05
Ferenczy 1958	51	0.48	47	0.00	50	0.06	53	0.06	19	0.40	40	0.15
Fliere 1977	2	0.64	36	0.00	8	0.14	3	0.60	30	0.40	12	0.49
Fou 1978	68	0.43	38	0.00	70	0.04	75	0.04	71	0.04	77	0.04
Francois 1956	46	0.49	54	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	50	0.05	70	0.05
Friedman 1923	62	0.44	82	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	17	0.39	43	0.15
Friedman 1923b	58	0.45	87	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	16	0.46	41	0.15
Friedman 1930	41	0.52	28	0.00	37	0.08	35	0.28	14	0.47	27	0.36
Garcia 2007	74	0.38	81	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	27	0.27	47	0.12
Garcia 2007b	77	0.37	29	0.00	62	0.04	70	0.04	32	0.17	61	0.08
Gierzod 1998	6	0.62	41	0.00	16	0.12	5	0.58	27	0.42	13	0.49
Gornostaeva 1994	57	0.46	53	0.00	73	0.04	76	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.04
Groot 1988	50	0.49	69	0.00	56	0.06	49	0.06	55	0.05	69	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955	4	0.62	10	0.01	13	0.11	8	0.58	26	0.40	17	0.48
Hatto 1993	44	0.50	48	0.00	12	0.11	23	0.46	19	0.33	26	0.39
Hatto 1997	38	0.52	18	0.01	9	0.11	15	0.52	14	0.42	19	0.47
Horowitz 1949	14	0.57	6	0.03	21	0.10	13	0.52	3	0.69	1	0.60
Indjic 1988	43	0.51	49	0.00	10	0.11	19	0.50	14	0.41	20	0.45
Kapell 1951	7	0.61	26	0.00	5	0.14	6	0.58	10	0.47	8	0.52
Kissin 1993	26	0.54	9	0.01	28	0.08	34	0.30	36	0.18	37	0.23
Kushner 1989	35	0.52	31	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.06	67	0.05
Luisada 1991	48	0.49	75	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.05	72	0.04
Lushtak 2004	17	0.56	4	0.05	11	0.11	25	0.45	29	0.37	23	0.41
Malcuzynski 1961	15	0.57	76	0.00	27	0.10	29	0.36	35	0.24	32	0.29
Magaloff 1978	49	0.49	24	0.00	35	0.08	41	0.19	57	0.05	51	0.10
Magin 1975	45	0.50	56	0.00	26	0.08	39	0.24	38	0.15	39	0.19
Michalowski 1933	34	0.52	19	0.00	19	0.10	14	0.52	4	0.57	7	0.54
Milkina 1970	59	0.45	16	0.01	68	0.04	73	0.04	64	0.05	78	0.04
Mohovich 1999	55	0.46	83	0.00	64	0.04	65	0.04	72	0.03	87	0.03
Moravec 1969	66	0.43	66	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	64	0.04	82	0.03
Morozova 2008	29	0.53	57	0.00	45	0.09	42	0.17	56	0.05	56	0.09
Neighaus 1950	25	0.54	32	0.00	31	0.10	20	0.48	45	0.12	36	0.24
Niedzielski 1931	42	0.52	14	0.01	24	0.07	27	0.43	6	0.60	9	0.51
Ohlsson 1999	20	0.56	44	0.00	22	0.07	18	0.50	30	0.31	25	0.39
Osinska 1989	40	0.52	86	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	57	0.05	63	0.05
Pachmann 1927	72	0.41	30	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	32	0.24	53	0.10
Paderewski 1930	56	0.46	45	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	34	0.19	52	0.10
Perlemuter 1992	33	0.52	68	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.27	27	0.35	31	0.31
Pierdomenico 2008	84	0.34	70	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	62	0.05	74	0.04
Poblocka 1999	3	0.63	3	0.06	2	0.20	2	0.62	8	0.51	3	0.56
Rabcewiczowa 1932	60	0.45	59	0.00	65	0.05	56	0.05	63	0.04	76	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923	24	0.55	8	0.01	17	0.12	21	0.48	15	0.46	18	0.47
Rangell 2001	85	0.32	80	0.00	77	0.04	80	0.04	80	0.03	89	0.03
Richter 1976	9	0.60	2	0.07	4	0.14	7	0.58	5	0.62	2	0.60
Rosen 1989	61	0.44	60	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	82	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1930	54	0.46	52	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	23	0.35	48	0.12
Rosenthal 1931	78	0.36	91	0.00	83	0.04	68	0.04	42	0.16	60	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b	79	0.36	84	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	34	0.28	59	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c	64	0.44	21	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	34	0.32	50	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d	81	0.35	11	0.01	81	0.04	71	0.04	30	0.24	55	0.10
Rossi 2007	87	0.29	89	0.00	87	0.03	87	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1939	86	0.30	61	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	64	0.05	75	0.04
Rubinstein 1952	80	0.36	58	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.04	90	0.03
Rubinstein 1966	70	0.42	33	0.00	76	0.05	62	0.05	64	0.05	68	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002	37	0.52	12	0.01	36	0.07	31	0.33	40	0.15	38	0.22
Smith 1975	32	0.52	13	0.01	53	0.06	51	0.06	59	0.04	65	0.05
Sokolov 2002	30	0.53	43	0.00	33	0.08	30	0.36	29	0.31	29	0.33
Sztompka 1959	18	0.56	73	0.00	30	0.10	28	0.41	29	0.26	30	0.33
Tomsic 1995	83	0.35	78	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	88	0.03	85	0.03
Uninsky 1932	22	0.55	35	0.00	18	0.11	17	0.51	9	0.52	11	0.51
Uninsky 1971	5	0.62	7	0.02	3	0.25	4	0.59	7	0.54	5	0.56
Wasowski 1980	28	0.53	22	0.00	40	0.07	38	0.24	28	0.27	34	0.25
Zak 1937	16	0.56	63	0.00	20	0.10	12	0.53	21	0.44	14	0.48
Zak 1951	11	0.58	39	0.00	15	0.10	9	0.57	19	0.45	10	0.51
Average	1	0.72	1	0.56	1	0.56	1	0.82	41	0.28	15	0.48
Random 1	90	-0.03	77	0.00	90	0.02	90	0.02	43	0.10	80	0.04
Random 2	89	-0.01	90	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	15	0.39	57	0.09
Random 3	91	-0.07	88	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	87	0.02	91	0.01

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).