Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	42	0.45	33	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.04	59	0.05
Anderszewski 2003	43	0.44	65	0.00	31	0.06	34	0.22	49	0.05	40	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981	41	0.45	52	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	57	0.04	61	0.05
Bacha 2000	36	0.46	63	0.00	47	0.05	58	0.05	37	0.23	37	0.11
Badura 1965	67	0.37	72	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	67	0.04	76	0.04
Barbosa 1983	65	0.38	4	0.06	9	0.13	28	0.30	66	0.05	34	0.12
Biret 1990	18	0.52	43	0.00	27	0.06	20	0.34	48	0.08	25	0.16
Blet 2003	58	0.39	26	0.00	38	0.05	45	0.10	73	0.04	54	0.06
Block 1995	27	0.49	16	0.01	13	0.08	18	0.37	18	0.41	4	0.39
Blumental 1952	84	0.27	69	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969	7	0.55	2	0.08	3	0.18	2	0.60	13	0.51	1	0.55
Brailowsky 1960	52	0.42	78	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	43	0.13	47	0.07
Bunin 1987	68	0.37	25	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	79	0.03	86	0.03
Bunin 1987b	70	0.36	61	0.00	76	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.03
Chiu 1999	63	0.38	10	0.01	24	0.09	25	0.30	42	0.16	19	0.22
Cohen 1997	74	0.33	62	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	25	0.29	35	0.12
Cortot 1951	53	0.42	29	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.11	42	0.14	36	0.12
Csalog 1996	50	0.42	81	0.00	57	0.04	66	0.04	44	0.14	52	0.07
Czerny 1949	55	0.40	19	0.01	54	0.05	52	0.05	71	0.04	73	0.04
Czerny 1990	26	0.49	37	0.00	41	0.06	37	0.19	68	0.04	44	0.09
Duchoud 2007	22	0.50	14	0.01	23	0.07	29	0.29	37	0.18	18	0.23
Ezaki 2006	16	0.52	3	0.07	8	0.13	5	0.56	45	0.12	15	0.26
Falvay 1989	31	0.48	49	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.20	38	0.17	23	0.18
Farrell 1958	32	0.47	31	0.00	36	0.06	31	0.25	37	0.16	20	0.20
Ferenczy 1958	75	0.33	79	0.00	87	0.03	86	0.03	84	0.02	91	0.02
Fliere 1977	17	0.52	15	0.01	10	0.10	10	0.47	70	0.04	28	0.14
Fou 1978	24	0.50	20	0.01	5	0.15	6	0.54	34	0.24	6	0.36
Francois 1956	49	0.42	57	0.00	58	0.05	65	0.05	76	0.03	77	0.04
Friedman 1923	88	0.21	89	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	81	0.04	89	0.03
Friedman 1923b	87	0.21	47	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	69	0.04	87	0.03
Friedman 1930	86	0.25	12	0.01	71	0.03	73	0.03	75	0.04	83	0.03
Garcia 2007	66	0.37	74	0.00	65	0.06	46	0.06	44	0.11	46	0.08
Garcia 2007b	80	0.30	45	0.00	85	0.03	79	0.03	43	0.10	65	0.05
Gierzod 1998	23	0.50	35	0.00	40	0.06	36	0.20	66	0.04	43	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994	5	0.55	75	0.00	16	0.10	19	0.37	30	0.31	8	0.34
Groot 1988	39	0.45	67	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	47	0.06	62	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955	38	0.45	9	0.02	4	0.13	7	0.49	51	0.06	24	0.17
Hatto 1993	83	0.29	28	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	62	0.05	63	0.05
Hatto 1997	79	0.30	44	0.00	30	0.06	42	0.13	85	0.03	55	0.06
Horowitz 1949	57	0.39	88	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	62	0.04	81	0.03
Indjic 1988	82	0.29	70	0.00	53	0.06	47	0.06	73	0.04	58	0.05
Kapell 1951	14	0.53	7	0.02	39	0.05	38	0.19	52	0.05	39	0.10
Kissin 1993	9	0.54	58	0.00	14	0.08	9	0.47	61	0.05	26	0.15
Kushner 1989	4	0.57	6	0.02	7	0.16	3	0.59	32	0.26	3	0.39
Luisada 1991	47	0.43	64	0.00	56	0.05	62	0.05	57	0.05	57	0.05
Lushtak 2004	46	0.43	23	0.01	29	0.06	30	0.27	66	0.04	41	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961	3	0.59	22	0.01	6	0.13	17	0.41	25	0.31	7	0.36
Magaloff 1978	12	0.53	18	0.01	19	0.09	21	0.33	33	0.21	16	0.26
Magin 1975	37	0.46	53	0.00	45	0.07	41	0.13	69	0.04	50	0.07
Michalowski 1933	81	0.29	84	0.00	79	0.03	87	0.03	69	0.05	69	0.04
Milkina 1970	2	0.59	5	0.04	2	0.20	4	0.57	21	0.43	2	0.50
Mohovich 1999	15	0.53	36	0.00	22	0.07	16	0.42	46	0.09	22	0.19
Moravec 1969	48	0.42	42	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	77	0.03	78	0.03
Morozova 2008	59	0.39	17	0.01	50	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.04	71	0.04
Neighaus 1950	11	0.53	11	0.01	18	0.10	14	0.45	51	0.05	27	0.15
Niedzielski 1931	76	0.32	85	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	72	0.03	79	0.03
Ohlsson 1999	10	0.54	27	0.00	21	0.08	13	0.45	71	0.04	32	0.13
Osinska 1989	19	0.52	13	0.01	15	0.09	11	0.47	42	0.19	10	0.30
Pachmann 1927	56	0.40	56	0.00	63	0.06	50	0.06	27	0.34	29	0.14
Paderewski 1930	28	0.49	41	0.00	20	0.09	26	0.30	22	0.30	11	0.30
Perlemuter 1992	64	0.38	59	0.00	64	0.06	51	0.06	81	0.03	66	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008	25	0.49	76	0.00	35	0.06	32	0.24	22	0.34	12	0.29
Poblocka 1999	13	0.53	39	0.00	28	0.07	24	0.32	65	0.05	30	0.13
Rabcewiczowa 1932	45	0.43	54	0.00	59	0.05	63	0.05	42	0.12	45	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923	78	0.31	86	0.00	74	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.02	90	0.02
Rangell 2001	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1976	60	0.39	73	0.00	66	0.04	68	0.04	69	0.04	68	0.04
Rosen 1989	6	0.55	38	0.00	17	0.15	12	0.47	34	0.21	9	0.31
Rosenthal 1930	71	0.36	46	0.00	88	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931	73	0.36	82	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	45	0.11	53	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b	69	0.37	91	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	45	0.10	64	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c	54	0.40	83	0.00	80	0.02	88	0.02	53	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d	61	0.39	90	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	42	0.14	56	0.06
Rossi 2007	85	0.26	60	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	42	0.13	48	0.07
Rubinstein 1939	72	0.36	50	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	32	0.27	33	0.12
Rubinstein 1952	29	0.49	21	0.01	33	0.06	33	0.23	31	0.28	17	0.25
Rubinstein 1966	21	0.50	24	0.01	11	0.09	8	0.47	32	0.30	5	0.38
Schilhawsky 1960	77	0.32	55	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.04	82	0.03
Shebanova 2002	8	0.55	8	0.02	12	0.08	15	0.43	37	0.18	13	0.28
Smith 1975	44	0.44	48	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.11	69	0.04	49	0.07
Sokolov 2002	34	0.47	51	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	70	0.04	67	0.04
Sztompka 1959	33	0.47	40	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.14	77	0.04	51	0.07
Tomsic 1995	20	0.51	68	0.00	32	0.06	27	0.30	34	0.24	14	0.27
Uninsky 1932	62	0.38	66	0.00	69	0.05	64	0.05	70	0.04	72	0.04
Uninsky 1971	51	0.42	34	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	71	0.04	70	0.04
Wasowski 1980	40	0.45	32	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.15	58	0.05	42	0.09
Zak 1937	30	0.48	71	0.00	26	0.07	22	0.32	69	0.04	38	0.11
Zak 1951	35	0.47	30	0.00	25	0.08	23	0.32	66	0.05	31	0.13
Average	1	0.63	1	0.46	1	0.45	1	0.79	60	0.05	21	0.20
Random 1	91	-0.06	87	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	44	0.10	85	0.03
Random 2	90	0.00	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	36	0.19	74	0.04
Random 3	89	0.00	80	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	25	0.27	60	0.05

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).