Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	77	-0.06	53	0.00	59	0.03	67	0.03	90	0.02	68	0.02
Anderszewski 2003	7	0.02	7	0.05	4	0.13	5	0.49	89	0.02	7	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981	3	0.03	22	0.01	10	0.11	4	0.50	88	0.03	3	0.12
Bacha 2000	10	0.01	31	0.00	23	0.06	23	0.27	90	0.02	19	0.07
Badura 1965	57	-0.04	4	0.07	22	0.09	26	0.26	90	0.01	30	0.05
Barbosa 1983	54	-0.04	41	0.00	19	0.07	17	0.36	90	0.01	27	0.06
Biret 1990	33	-0.02	40	0.00	63	0.04	49	0.04	90	0.01	74	0.02
Blet 2003	39	-0.02	36	0.00	67	0.04	48	0.04	90	0.01	62	0.02
Block 1995	23	-0.01	21	0.01	31	0.05	32	0.15	90	0.02	31	0.05
Blumental 1952	60	-0.04	74	0.00	43	0.03	45	0.07	90	0.02	36	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969	43	-0.03	28	0.00	66	0.04	56	0.04	90	0.01	71	0.02
Brailowsky 1960	56	-0.04	48	0.00	65	0.04	50	0.04	89	0.02	38	0.03
Bunin 1987	47	-0.03	60	0.00	69	0.04	52	0.04	91	0.01	72	0.02
Bunin 1987b	41	-0.03	44	0.00	68	0.05	46	0.05	91	0.01	55	0.02
Chiu 1999	25	-0.01	26	0.00	30	0.07	27	0.25	89	0.02	21	0.07
Cohen 1997	4	0.03	10	0.03	6	0.11	9	0.43	89	0.02	14	0.09
Cortot 1951	9	0.02	5	0.06	5	0.12	1	0.58	89	0.02	6	0.11
Csalog 1996	52	-0.03	49	0.00	70	0.03	72	0.03	90	0.01	61	0.02
Czerny 1949	29	-0.02	12	0.03	11	0.09	6	0.46	90	0.02	8	0.10
Czerny 1990	53	-0.04	82	0.00	60	0.03	69	0.03	90	0.02	73	0.02
Duchoud 2007	1	0.06	13	0.03	7	0.12	3	0.55	89	0.02	9	0.10
Ezaki 2006	32	-0.02	34	0.00	20	0.09	16	0.36	89	0.02	16	0.08
Falvay 1989	81	-0.07	18	0.01	37	0.04	38	0.10	90	0.01	40	0.03
Farrell 1958	59	-0.04	51	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	91	0.01	52	0.02
Ferenczy 1958	76	-0.06	37	0.00	47	0.03	61	0.03	89	0.02	66	0.02
Fliere 1977	69	-0.05	72	0.00	81	0.02	81	0.02	91	0.01	80	0.01
Fou 1978	20	0.00	23	0.01	25	0.06	29	0.23	89	0.02	22	0.07
Francois 1956	27	-0.02	6	0.05	12	0.10	11	0.42	90	0.02	15	0.09
Friedman 1923	73	-0.05	57	0.00	86	0.02	82	0.02	91	0.01	91	0.01
Friedman 1923b	71	-0.05	76	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	91	0.01	88	0.01
Friedman 1930	36	-0.02	52	0.00	58	0.03	66	0.03	90	0.02	65	0.02
Garcia 2007	83	-0.07	63	0.00	57	0.03	65	0.03	91	0.01	69	0.02
Garcia 2007b	24	-0.01	30	0.00	36	0.05	37	0.11	90	0.01	49	0.03
Gierzod 1998	12	0.00	54	0.00	18	0.09	15	0.37	89	0.02	13	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994	21	-0.01	77	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.22	89	0.02	24	0.07
Groot 1988	44	-0.03	25	0.01	41	0.04	42	0.07	89	0.01	47	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955	84	-0.07	78	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	89	0.01	77	0.02
Hatto 1993	34	-0.02	79	0.00	54	0.03	59	0.03	90	0.01	76	0.02
Hatto 1997	28	-0.02	88	0.00	55	0.04	51	0.04	90	0.02	45	0.03
Horowitz 1949	79	-0.06	47	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	91	0.01	84	0.01
Indjic 1988	31	-0.02	71	0.00	56	0.03	60	0.03	90	0.01	60	0.02
Kapell 1951	30	-0.02	9	0.03	13	0.10	13	0.41	89	0.02	12	0.09
Kissin 1993	75	-0.06	83	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	91	0.01	58	0.02
Kushner 1989	22	-0.01	35	0.00	34	0.04	34	0.13	89	0.01	34	0.04
Luisada 1991	50	-0.03	32	0.00	53	0.04	55	0.04	90	0.02	37	0.03
Lushtak 2004	46	-0.03	81	0.00	52	0.03	58	0.03	90	0.02	70	0.02
Malcuzynski 1961	15	0.00	80	0.00	28	0.07	20	0.31	89	0.01	26	0.06
Magaloff 1978	42	-0.03	65	0.00	40	0.04	39	0.09	90	0.01	39	0.03
Magin 1975	5	0.02	15	0.02	8	0.11	7	0.45	89	0.02	11	0.09
Michalowski 1933	18	0.00	58	0.00	17	0.09	24	0.27	91	0.01	29	0.05
Milkina 1970	45	-0.03	67	0.00	64	0.05	47	0.05	91	0.01	54	0.02
Mohovich 1999	49	-0.03	39	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.16	90	0.02	28	0.06
Moravec 1969	72	-0.05	89	0.00	75	0.02	80	0.02	91	0.01	79	0.01
Morozova 2008	63	-0.04	42	0.00	50	0.04	54	0.04	90	0.02	44	0.03
Neighaus 1950	48	-0.03	86	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	90	0.02	75	0.02
Niedzielski 1931	90	-0.07	66	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	91	0.01	83	0.01
Ohlsson 1999	2	0.04	1	0.14	1	0.14	2	0.58	89	0.02	5	0.11
Osinska 1989	68	-0.05	69	0.00	46	0.03	63	0.03	90	0.02	50	0.02
Pachmann 1927	88	-0.07	17	0.01	76	0.02	79	0.02	91	0.01	85	0.01
Paderewski 1930	40	-0.03	87	0.00	35	0.04	36	0.11	90	0.01	43	0.03
Perlemuter 1992	58	-0.04	11	0.03	21	0.08	22	0.28	89	0.02	20	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008	17	0.00	8	0.04	15	0.09	14	0.39	88	0.02	10	0.09
Poblocka 1999	70	-0.05	45	0.00	61	0.03	68	0.03	90	0.02	51	0.02
Rabcewiczowa 1932	51	-0.03	27	0.00	45	0.03	44	0.07	90	0.02	33	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923	78	-0.06	46	0.00	80	0.02	83	0.02	91	0.01	81	0.01
Rangell 2001	14	0.00	70	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.27	89	0.01	32	0.05
Richter 1976	55	-0.04	19	0.01	44	0.03	43	0.07	90	0.01	42	0.03
Rosen 1989	16	0.00	50	0.00	26	0.06	28	0.24	89	0.02	23	0.07
Rosenthal 1930	38	-0.02	16	0.01	33	0.05	33	0.14	90	0.01	35	0.04
Rosenthal 1931	91	-0.09	59	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	91	0.01	86	0.01
Rosenthal 1931b	85	-0.07	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	91	0.01	90	0.01
Rosenthal 1931c	66	-0.04	20	0.01	39	0.04	40	0.09	91	0.01	48	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d	86	-0.07	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	91	0.01	89	0.01
Rossi 2007	61	-0.04	14	0.02	14	0.11	19	0.32	89	0.02	18	0.08
Rubinstein 1939	82	-0.07	90	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	91	0.01	82	0.01
Rubinstein 1952	62	-0.04	55	0.00	72	0.03	70	0.03	90	0.01	78	0.02
Rubinstein 1966	74	-0.05	64	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	90	0.02	63	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960	89	-0.07	62	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	91	0.01	87	0.01
Shebanova 2002	26	-0.02	38	0.00	51	0.03	62	0.03	90	0.01	67	0.02
Smith 1975	13	0.00	24	0.01	9	0.09	12	0.42	86	0.03	4	0.11
Sokolov 2002	19	0.00	29	0.00	16	0.09	18	0.32	91	0.01	25	0.06
Sztompka 1959	35	-0.02	75	0.00	49	0.04	53	0.04	89	0.01	57	0.02
Tomsic 1995	37	-0.02	33	0.00	38	0.04	35	0.12	90	0.01	41	0.03
Uninsky 1932	65	-0.04	43	0.00	42	0.03	41	0.08	90	0.01	46	0.03
Uninsky 1971	67	-0.04	68	0.00	48	0.03	57	0.03	91	0.01	59	0.02
Wasowski 1980	11	0.00	61	0.00	27	0.06	21	0.30	89	0.02	17	0.08
Zak 1937	87	-0.07	85	0.00	82	0.03	75	0.03	91	0.01	53	0.02
Zak 1951	80	-0.06	56	0.00	78	0.03	73	0.03	90	0.01	56	0.02
Average	64	-0.04	91	0.00	79	0.03	71	0.03	90	0.01	64	0.02
Random 1	8	0.02	3	0.13	3	0.17	10	0.43	2	0.50	1	0.46
Random 2	6	0.02	2	0.14	2	0.14	8	0.45	9	0.44	2	0.44
Random 3	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).