Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	7	0.64	31	0.00	17	0.09	13	0.47	15	0.50	15	0.48
Anderszewski 2003	31	0.56	37	0.00	15	0.10	11	0.48	7	0.55	11	0.51
Ashkenazy 1981	35	0.55	75	0.00	20	0.09	17	0.41	20	0.42	20	0.41
Bacha 2000	75	0.42	54	0.00	72	0.04	81	0.04	35	0.26	59	0.10
Badura 1965	63	0.49	53	0.00	48	0.05	54	0.05	27	0.35	53	0.13
Barbosa 1983	66	0.48	39	0.00	47	0.05	56	0.05	23	0.37	49	0.14
Biret 1990	32	0.56	77	0.00	37	0.04	36	0.24	24	0.32	37	0.28
Blet 2003	28	0.56	52	0.00	44	0.08	41	0.18	14	0.44	36	0.28
Block 1995	34	0.55	12	0.01	45	0.06	44	0.12	12	0.46	38	0.23
Blumental 1952	71	0.45	36	0.00	22	0.09	31	0.27	19	0.31	33	0.29
Boshniakovich 1969	19	0.59	32	0.00	34	0.08	33	0.25	24	0.35	32	0.30
Brailowsky 1960	48	0.53	26	0.00	61	0.04	71	0.04	21	0.44	50	0.13
Bunin 1987	53	0.51	40	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	23	0.38	48	0.15
Bunin 1987b	55	0.51	78	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	21	0.39	45	0.15
Chiu 1999	76	0.42	43	0.00	70	0.05	59	0.05	44	0.14	63	0.08
Cohen 1997	86	0.33	55	0.00	84	0.06	47	0.06	42	0.17	60	0.10
Cortot 1951	47	0.53	48	0.00	33	0.09	37	0.22	13	0.49	30	0.33
Csalog 1996	23	0.57	2	0.07	10	0.09	24	0.37	2	0.73	9	0.52
Czerny 1949	26	0.56	89	0.00	40	0.05	32	0.27	28	0.35	31	0.31
Czerny 1990	9	0.64	33	0.00	18	0.09	15	0.45	17	0.45	17	0.45
Duchoud 2007	56	0.51	82	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	20	0.43	44	0.16
Ezaki 2006	13	0.63	9	0.01	24	0.08	23	0.37	24	0.41	22	0.39
Falvay 1989	41	0.54	23	0.00	55	0.04	79	0.04	40	0.15	64	0.08
Farrell 1958	61	0.49	35	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	39	0.16	65	0.08
Ferenczy 1958	17	0.61	61	0.00	21	0.09	14	0.46	4	0.59	10	0.52
Fliere 1977	3	0.69	4	0.02	3	0.28	2	0.71	7	0.63	1	0.67
Fou 1978	37	0.55	18	0.00	39	0.05	42	0.18	40	0.15	43	0.16
Francois 1956	67	0.48	64	0.00	76	0.03	86	0.03	53	0.04	89	0.03
Friedman 1923	85	0.33	22	0.00	80	0.04	69	0.04	46	0.07	77	0.05
Friedman 1923b	84	0.34	41	0.00	79	0.05	60	0.05	58	0.05	75	0.05
Friedman 1930	78	0.39	28	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	55	0.05	83	0.04
Garcia 2007	77	0.41	56	0.00	73	0.05	66	0.05	20	0.33	52	0.13
Garcia 2007b	81	0.37	49	0.00	78	0.05	53	0.05	38	0.12	67	0.08
Gierzod 1998	8	0.64	20	0.00	14	0.12	4	0.56	14	0.51	8	0.53
Gornostaeva 1994	33	0.55	65	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.05	76	0.05
Groot 1988	43	0.54	16	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	36	0.25	58	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955	52	0.52	66	0.00	25	0.09	20	0.41	38	0.21	34	0.29
Hatto 1993	69	0.47	13	0.01	12	0.11	25	0.36	14	0.41	24	0.38
Hatto 1997	54	0.51	7	0.02	8	0.12	19	0.41	11	0.46	18	0.43
Horowitz 1949	62	0.49	87	0.00	71	0.06	46	0.06	30	0.40	46	0.15
Indjic 1988	64	0.48	15	0.01	11	0.09	26	0.35	16	0.39	26	0.37
Kapell 1951	2	0.71	3	0.04	2	0.34	3	0.66	3	0.59	3	0.62
Kissin 1993	10	0.63	10	0.01	16	0.09	18	0.41	27	0.37	23	0.39
Kushner 1989	15	0.61	8	0.02	35	0.06	35	0.24	42	0.15	41	0.19
Luisada 1991	22	0.58	34	0.00	27	0.08	30	0.28	27	0.38	29	0.33
Lushtak 2004	20	0.59	47	0.00	19	0.12	12	0.48	7	0.55	12	0.51
Malcuzynski 1961	27	0.56	27	0.00	53	0.05	62	0.05	54	0.05	74	0.05
Magaloff 1978	40	0.55	62	0.00	59	0.05	63	0.05	68	0.04	79	0.04
Magin 1975	45	0.53	11	0.01	46	0.06	52	0.06	52	0.05	72	0.05
Michalowski 1933	65	0.48	83	0.00	31	0.06	27	0.33	10	0.48	21	0.40
Milkina 1970	29	0.56	72	0.00	58	0.04	73	0.04	50	0.07	73	0.05
Mohovich 1999	18	0.61	44	0.00	26	0.08	22	0.38	20	0.49	19	0.43
Moravec 1969	57	0.51	57	0.00	74	0.05	64	0.05	37	0.18	61	0.09
Morozova 2008	39	0.55	29	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.17	40	0.13	47	0.15
Neighaus 1950	24	0.57	17	0.00	28	0.07	21	0.39	27	0.30	28	0.34
Niedzielski 1931	68	0.48	70	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	22	0.39	55	0.12
Ohlsson 1999	16	0.61	50	0.00	13	0.09	7	0.52	14	0.48	13	0.50
Osinska 1989	14	0.62	45	0.00	23	0.09	16	0.43	19	0.48	16	0.45
Pachmann 1927	74	0.43	80	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	38	0.20	62	0.09
Paderewski 1930	70	0.47	68	0.00	68	0.04	85	0.04	23	0.30	56	0.11
Perlemuter 1992	60	0.50	71	0.00	65	0.04	78	0.04	43	0.13	68	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008	80	0.37	86	0.00	83	0.04	75	0.04	72	0.04	81	0.04
Poblocka 1999	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rabcewiczowa 1932	51	0.52	58	0.00	63	0.06	50	0.06	25	0.27	51	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923	72	0.45	73	0.00	66	0.05	57	0.05	66	0.04	80	0.04
Rangell 2001	46	0.53	42	0.00	60	0.05	65	0.05	24	0.32	54	0.13
Richter 1976	12	0.63	5	0.02	9	0.11	9	0.50	3	0.65	4	0.57
Rosen 1989	21	0.58	59	0.00	38	0.05	38	0.21	30	0.26	39	0.23
Rosenthal 1930	59	0.50	67	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	32	0.29	57	0.11
Rosenthal 1931	83	0.34	90	0.00	86	0.04	80	0.04	80	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b	87	0.32	91	0.00	87	0.04	83	0.04	75	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c	73	0.45	79	0.00	81	0.03	87	0.03	56	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d	82	0.36	88	0.00	85	0.03	88	0.03	69	0.03	86	0.03
Rossi 2007	88	0.24	85	0.00	88	0.04	82	0.04	63	0.04	78	0.04
Rubinstein 1939	79	0.37	25	0.00	57	0.04	84	0.04	49	0.05	82	0.04
Rubinstein 1952	58	0.50	24	0.00	29	0.06	45	0.10	48	0.07	66	0.08
Rubinstein 1966	49	0.52	14	0.01	56	0.05	61	0.05	53	0.08	70	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960	11	0.63	6	0.02	4	0.14	8	0.51	2	0.62	5	0.56
Shebanova 2002	6	0.65	21	0.00	7	0.14	6	0.53	9	0.56	6	0.54
Smith 1975	25	0.56	69	0.00	42	0.08	40	0.20	33	0.24	40	0.22
Sokolov 2002	44	0.54	84	0.00	54	0.04	77	0.04	49	0.06	71	0.05
Sztompka 1959	4	0.67	63	0.00	5	0.19	5	0.53	8	0.53	7	0.53
Tomsic 1995	50	0.52	38	0.00	64	0.05	67	0.05	45	0.10	69	0.07
Uninsky 1932	42	0.54	46	0.00	32	0.08	28	0.30	21	0.44	27	0.36
Uninsky 1971	5	0.65	30	0.00	6	0.13	10	0.48	10	0.49	14	0.48
Wasowski 1980	36	0.55	19	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.29	11	0.48	25	0.37
Zak 1937	30	0.56	76	0.00	36	0.06	34	0.25	30	0.32	35	0.28
Zak 1951	38	0.55	51	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.21	44	0.16	42	0.18
Average	1	0.76	1	0.64	1	0.63	1	0.84	16	0.49	2	0.64
Random 1	91	-0.07	74	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	77	0.02	91	0.01
Random 2	89	-0.04	81	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	52	0.05	85	0.03
Random 3	90	-0.05	60	0.00	90	0.02	90	0.02	68	0.03	90	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).