Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	27	0.49	36	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.41	59	0.04	38	0.13
Anderszewski 2003	53	0.42	60	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.15	77	0.03	46	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981	12	0.55	6	0.05	9	0.16	7	0.63	33	0.28	11	0.42
Bacha 2000	74	0.37	85	0.00	74	0.02	88	0.02	74	0.04	67	0.03
Badura 1965	61	0.41	30	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.05	56	0.05
Barbosa 1983	78	0.35	49	0.00	71	0.03	86	0.03	75	0.04	75	0.03
Biret 1990	43	0.46	32	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.13	70	0.04	47	0.07
Blet 2003	50	0.42	46	0.00	68	0.03	66	0.03	81	0.03	77	0.03
Block 1995	40	0.47	34	0.00	36	0.10	37	0.34	37	0.17	17	0.24
Blumental 1952	65	0.40	48	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	75	0.04	65	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969	10	0.55	18	0.01	13	0.13	9	0.61	32	0.28	13	0.41
Brailowsky 1960	20	0.51	39	0.00	25	0.10	17	0.53	13	0.57	3	0.55
Bunin 1987	14	0.54	20	0.01	17	0.09	19	0.51	15	0.45	8	0.48
Bunin 1987b	16	0.53	40	0.00	24	0.11	23	0.49	19	0.41	10	0.45
Chiu 1999	47	0.45	21	0.00	34	0.09	31	0.39	57	0.05	34	0.14
Cohen 1997	88	0.18	75	0.00	87	0.03	69	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.03
Cortot 1951	69	0.38	91	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	65	0.04	83	0.03
Csalog 1996	84	0.33	67	0.00	84	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03
Czerny 1949	34	0.47	87	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	78	0.03	62	0.04
Czerny 1990	26	0.50	62	0.00	47	0.08	46	0.08	78	0.03	57	0.05
Duchoud 2007	71	0.38	52	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04
Ezaki 2006	46	0.45	38	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	76	0.04	59	0.04
Falvay 1989	52	0.42	78	0.00	77	0.03	85	0.03	78	0.04	70	0.03
Farrell 1958	60	0.41	66	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Ferenczy 1958	82	0.34	64	0.00	75	0.02	89	0.02	73	0.03	89	0.02
Fliere 1977	7	0.56	61	0.00	11	0.10	10	0.61	61	0.04	27	0.16
Fou 1978	29	0.49	22	0.00	22	0.08	27	0.43	56	0.05	32	0.15
Francois 1956	58	0.41	69	0.00	67	0.03	72	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03
Friedman 1923	83	0.34	90	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.06	58	0.05
Friedman 1923b	81	0.34	35	0.00	58	0.05	54	0.05	41	0.12	44	0.08
Friedman 1930	54	0.42	33	0.00	38	0.08	39	0.27	45	0.10	30	0.16
Garcia 2007	77	0.35	72	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	65	0.04	79	0.03
Garcia 2007b	80	0.35	79	0.00	65	0.03	67	0.03	85	0.03	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998	35	0.47	88	0.00	37	0.11	36	0.35	84	0.02	43	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994	45	0.45	80	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	80	0.02	81	0.03
Groot 1988	2	0.58	14	0.01	8	0.22	4	0.66	22	0.42	5	0.53
Harasiewicz 1955	15	0.53	25	0.00	7	0.16	6	0.63	53	0.06	22	0.19
Hatto 1993	59	0.41	37	0.00	20	0.10	33	0.37	44	0.12	18	0.21
Hatto 1997	56	0.42	9	0.03	19	0.08	35	0.35	53	0.05	37	0.13
Horowitz 1949	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Indjic 1988	55	0.42	55	0.00	21	0.12	34	0.36	45	0.11	20	0.20
Kapell 1951	38	0.47	10	0.03	48	0.06	48	0.06	64	0.04	52	0.05
Kissin 1993	18	0.52	19	0.01	16	0.09	16	0.54	53	0.06	23	0.18
Kushner 1989	41	0.47	81	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	87	0.02	72	0.03
Luisada 1991	25	0.50	24	0.00	32	0.08	20	0.51	59	0.05	26	0.16
Lushtak 2004	57	0.41	71	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	73	0.04	64	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961	4	0.57	16	0.01	10	0.10	11	0.59	37	0.21	14	0.35
Magaloff 1978	19	0.51	50	0.00	33	0.10	24	0.46	60	0.04	35	0.14
Magin 1975	24	0.50	47	0.00	18	0.09	22	0.49	46	0.08	19	0.20
Michalowski 1933	76	0.36	53	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.05	61	0.04
Milkina 1970	17	0.53	42	0.00	23	0.08	18	0.51	53	0.07	21	0.19
Mohovich 1999	22	0.50	82	0.00	27	0.07	32	0.38	58	0.05	36	0.14
Moravec 1969	32	0.47	23	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.13	50	0.05	42	0.08
Morozova 2008	30	0.49	15	0.01	30	0.09	21	0.50	55	0.05	29	0.16
Neighaus 1950	11	0.55	28	0.00	12	0.12	13	0.57	64	0.05	25	0.17
Niedzielski 1931	39	0.47	4	0.06	14	0.10	25	0.45	17	0.47	9	0.46
Ohlsson 1999	36	0.47	73	0.00	39	0.10	38	0.27	72	0.04	40	0.10
Osinska 1989	42	0.46	26	0.00	55	0.05	49	0.05	86	0.03	60	0.04
Pachmann 1927	73	0.37	31	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	46	0.08	53	0.05
Paderewski 1930	68	0.38	58	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.03
Perlemuter 1992	33	0.47	45	0.00	40	0.08	40	0.25	63	0.04	39	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008	64	0.40	54	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	50	0.07	48	0.06
Poblocka 1999	28	0.49	74	0.00	28	0.08	30	0.40	46	0.06	31	0.15
Rabcewiczowa 1932	75	0.36	59	0.00	85	0.03	71	0.03	76	0.03	71	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923	3	0.58	2	0.19	2	0.31	2	0.71	7	0.53	1	0.61
Rangell 2001	66	0.39	68	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	75	0.03	82	0.03
Richter 1976	13	0.55	8	0.04	6	0.13	12	0.58	11	0.50	4	0.54
Rosen 1989	48	0.43	44	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.10	71	0.04	49	0.06
Rosenthal 1930	44	0.45	56	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.18	25	0.34	16	0.25
Rosenthal 1931	85	0.33	70	0.00	82	0.04	64	0.04	47	0.06	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b	79	0.35	76	0.00	73	0.03	68	0.03	42	0.14	50	0.06
Rosenthal 1931c	70	0.38	57	0.00	81	0.03	70	0.03	67	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d	72	0.38	83	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	38	0.19	45	0.08
Rossi 2007	87	0.19	63	0.00	88	0.03	74	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03
Rubinstein 1939	86	0.33	43	0.00	86	0.05	57	0.05	62	0.05	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1952	67	0.39	29	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	62	0.05	66	0.04
Rubinstein 1966	63	0.40	84	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.04	78	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960	5	0.57	7	0.05	5	0.17	3	0.69	13	0.52	2	0.60
Shebanova 2002	23	0.50	13	0.01	26	0.07	15	0.55	59	0.05	24	0.17
Smith 1975	62	0.40	77	0.00	69	0.03	83	0.03	89	0.02	87	0.02
Sokolov 2002	49	0.43	86	0.00	53	0.04	59	0.04	85	0.03	68	0.03
Sztompka 1959	37	0.47	17	0.01	50	0.06	47	0.06	69	0.05	54	0.05
Tomsic 1995	51	0.42	41	0.00	66	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.04	73	0.03
Uninsky 1932	21	0.51	12	0.02	31	0.07	26	0.45	42	0.16	15	0.27
Uninsky 1971	31	0.48	27	0.00	35	0.12	28	0.42	55	0.06	28	0.16
Wasowski 1980	8	0.56	11	0.03	15	0.09	14	0.56	26	0.30	12	0.41
Zak 1937	6	0.56	5	0.06	4	0.22	5	0.64	26	0.38	6	0.49
Zak 1951	9	0.56	3	0.08	3	0.14	8	0.63	28	0.36	7	0.48
Average	1	0.66	1	0.25	1	0.25	1	0.79	78	0.03	33	0.15
Random 1	91	-0.10	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	71	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2	89	0.01	51	0.00	89	0.03	87	0.03	17	0.35	41	0.10
Random 3	90	-0.06	65	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	85	0.02	91	0.01

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).